Sonik22 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 God, anything but Jackson, that move would infuriate me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (daa84 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:55 AM) something big? wonder what that could be...berkman? greinke? ichiro? i can dream ichiro... oh I love that. not gonna happen though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 10:56 AM) I have to imagine, if the Sox did give up Hudson, we would be getting some decent amounts of cash back. With the D-backs supposedly in "Salary cutting mode"...I doubt this'll be an Oswalt like payout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:56 AM) I have to imagine, if the Sox did give up Hudson, we would be getting some decent amounts of cash back. Can't see how since Arizona is in financial trouble themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Ozzie Ball @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:57 AM) Crossing my fingers for it being Prince Fielder. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 10:57 AM) Can't see how since Arizona is in financial trouble themselves. I think a good comparison is the Vazquez trade...the Sox had to supposedly work like crazy just to get Arizona to chip in a million or so on that one out of his >$10 million salary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 07:57 AM) Not so much: BNightengale #mlb # If deal gets done, the White Sox would send Daniel Hudson and prospect for Jackson,and take on Jackson's entire $8.75 million salary 1 minute ago via web The D-Backs are in no position to include cash. What the heck. This really just doesn't make sense, unless the Sox somehow think very lowly of Dan Hudson. And if they do, I think that is a mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 03:57 PM) Not so much: BNightengale #mlb # If deal gets done, the White Sox would send Daniel Hudson and prospect for Jackson,and take on Jackson's entire $8.75 million salary 1 minute ago via web The D-Backs are in no position to include cash. That would be just an awful deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:57 AM) This. I'll take the artist formerly known as Prince at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Well whatever it is. I hope he gets it done soon. I am sick of f***ing waiting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitoMB345 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Dude, Kenny really is a master of the media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 10:52 AM) What could the something big be? Knowing Kenny it's a name no one has talked about. Well if it means the Jackson deal would be off, does that mean it would be another pitcher? Marcum? Nolasco? Santana? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:55 AM) can someone tell me what Cowley said? cst_sox Clear up an earlier tweet - I talked to J. Dye, the Sox haven't. Dye said he's ready, but Sox have somehow lost his number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 It won't be Prince, as Milwaukee isn't in sell mode now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 We might as well have went after Oswalt or Haren. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:59 AM) We might as well have went after Oswalt or Haren. Agreed should have went after Haren for this price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Rosenthal Dunn still in play for Sox, 3 way trade, Jackson to Nats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Dunn's not out of the picture just yet: Ken_Rosenthal Source: Dunn still in play for #WhiteSox, poss 3-way with #D-backs, Jackson would go to #Nationals - or if deal fails, end up with #WhiteSox. Deal in #Nationals' hands. #WhiteSox's Hudson ends up with #Diamondbacks either way. Highly unlikely to start tonight. I expect Harrell is in Chicago or on his way now. Can't imagine Pena getting a spot start but who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:00 AM) Agreed should have went after Haren for this price. Hell, as much as the Astros are chipping in for Oswalt, Roy Oswalt would be cheaper next season for the Phils than Jackson would be for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 @Ken_Rosenthal - Source: Dunn still in play for #WhiteSox, poss 3-way with #D-backs, Jackson would go to #Nationals - or if deal fails, end up (more) #MLB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Here we go again with the barrage....what did Rosenthal say again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 (edited) Cowley If I had names I would report them. All I've been told is it's big. Also been told that the chance of Hudson starting tonight is almost zero Jackson-Hudson deal is not off, it's just being delayed while KW tries to shock the world. Hudson for Jackson might still happen either way. Edited July 30, 2010 by justBLAZE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Cowley - If I had names I would report them. All I've been told is it's big. Also been told that the chance of Hudson starting tonight is almost zero. Jackson-Hudson deal is not off, it's just being delayed while KW tries to shock the world. Hudson for Jackson might still happen either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Sounds like Huddy is gone. I wonder what we get. We have to get a pitcher if we move Hudson (even if he is moved for a bat). There is absolutely no one in our organization that could fill that rotation spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 We're basically giving the game away tonight if we don't throw Hudson. Ugh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.