BigSqwert Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Great. A disaster of a deadline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyons Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:25 PM) masnBen #Nationals GM Mike Rizzo said the price won't come down on Adam Dunn before the deadline. #mlb less than a minute ago via Twitter for BlackBerry® Yeah, but what's the guy supposed to say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:26 PM) Great. A disaster of a deadline. it's 3pm tomorrow, and what's Rizzo suppose to say "Hey, GMs, we're cutting Dunn's price right now!" He's probably at the stadium and getting asked by reporters, much like I expect KWs press conference to go....... "We are thrilled to have Jackson on our team, we've had him on our radar for a long time. Nothing is done right now but I'll leave my options open until the deadline and I'm always trying to improve the team." Edited July 30, 2010 by SoxFan562004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knackattack Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Nothing else will probably happen today, or until the hours before the deadline tomorrow. Rizzo wouldn't be doing his job if he didn't use all of his allotted time to try and get the best possible deal for Dunn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 I think that Jackson could be exponentially better than Hudson. There is a reason why the Sox made the deal, and its not because they are in the business of overpaying for players who arent as good. My guess is that Coop soured on Hudson, while at the same time he likes Jackson. Could be a case of the grass is always greener, but I just dont have a lot of faith in Hudson. He may prove me wrong, but it wouldnt surprise me if the guy never is a major league starter either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWhiteSoxinNJ Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:26 PM) Great. A disaster of a deadline. Yeah, because the White Sox deadline is a day earlier then the rest of the league..... Get a grip people. Rotation is upgraded, I am happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 I've read a s***load of this thread. I will probably be hammered tonight (friend's birthday) but i'll be quietly getting the popcorn to read all this tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 03:14 PM) No one knows... but what we do know for a fact is that Hudson would do at 1/15th of the cost. Just one small distinction here...Jackson will only be making $1.5 million here for the remainder of THIS season. I don't think it's quite fair to be counting his salary for next season just yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:28 PM) I think that Jackson could be exponentially better than Hudson. There is a reason why the Sox made the deal, and its not because they are in the business of overpaying for players who arent as good. My guess is that Coop soured on Hudson, while at the same time he likes Jackson. Could be a case of the grass is always greener, but I just dont have a lot of faith in Hudson. He may prove me wrong, but it wouldnt surprise me if the guy never is a major league starter either. And that would just be a dumbass way of approaching things. If you want to take on Jackson as a project, you wait until the offseason, when you have time to work with him. Not in the middle of a playoff run where he offers just as many question marks as the guy you traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:30 PM) Just one small distinction here...Jackson will only be making $1.5 million here for the remainder of THIS season. I don't think it's quite fair to be counting his salary for next season just yet... Until we are off the hook for it, it still counts. Just like Linebrink's salary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:30 PM) And that would just be a dumbass way of approaching things. If you want to take on Jackson as a project, you wait until the offseason, when you have time to work with him. Not in the middle of a playoff run where he offers just as many question marks as the guy you traded. unless you obtained him with the chance he could get moved in a Dunn trade. That way if he stays you have the project aspect of it if not you got the bat you wanted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 05:30 PM) Just one small distinction here...Jackson will only be making $1.5 million here for the remainder of THIS season. I don't think it's quite fair to be counting his salary for next season just yet... Then we've got a choice if somehow we dump Jackson's contract. Either we go and find Bartolo Colon and see if he'll sign for another $500k next offseason, or we take Jackson's $8 million and spend it on another overpaid FA pitcher somewhere. Unless we've got a method to catch Freddy Garcia-like lightning in a bottle next year, or we're totally insane and we're going to dump Sale into the fryer immediately next year, we're going to need another starting pitcher if we somehow became the 4th team to give up on Jackson in 2 years, and we're absolutely not going to get an MLB-ready minor league arm for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 02:31 PM) Until we are off the hook for it, it still counts. Just like Linebrink's salary. I hate to lump Jackson in the same category as Linebrink, but he's not that far away performance-wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Ugh, hearing that Yanks won't give up any premium prospects to get Berkman really frustrates me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 03:31 PM) Until we are off the hook for it, it still counts. Just like Linebrink's salary. You aren't paying him that now though. You're paying him roughly $1.3 million more this season than you would have paid Hudson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:35 PM) Ugh, hearing that Yanks won't give up any premium prospects to get Berkman really frustrates me. And this is when the reputation of our farm system screws us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 03:40 PM) Somebody needs to pull up some old Javy threads. I can't believe people are supporting this abomination of a trade. I think there are some similarites to Daniel Cabrera here too. All stuff, little control and people will be screaming upside till he's out of baseball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:35 PM) Ugh, hearing that Yanks won't give up any premium prospects to get Berkman really frustrates me. The only problem is that I have a feeling Berkman would have rejected a trade to us, especially if it were between us and the Yankees. But then again, I have a feeling KW never was planning on going after Berkman anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 What's going on with the KW press conference? Anyone listening? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macsandz Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:28 PM) I think that Jackson could be exponentially better than Hudson. There is a reason why the Sox made the deal, and its not because they are in the business of overpaying for players who arent as good. My guess is that Coop soured on Hudson, while at the same time he likes Jackson. Could be a case of the grass is always greener, but I just dont have a lot of faith in Hudson. He may prove me wrong, but it wouldnt surprise me if the guy never is a major league starter either. The bottom line is Jackson is a lot better than Hudson for this year's pennant race. The guy was an ALL STAR a year ago. In our Division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:36 PM) You aren't paying him that now though. You're paying him roughly $1.3 million more this season than you would have paid Hudson. Balta pretty much summed it up. Even if you do trade him, then you still need to sign a 5th starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:38 PM) What's going on with the KW press conference? Anyone listening? Only thing B&B said was KW said something to the effect that he doesn't have to win every trade just get a guy who fits into what he is trying to do or something like that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:38 PM) What's going on with the KW press conference? Anyone listening? Well KW said that they want to change just one thing with Jackson's mechanics. Sounds like he's staying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macsandz Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (AWhiteSoxinNJ @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:29 PM) Yeah, because the White Sox deadline is a day earlier then the rest of the league..... Get a grip people. Rotation is upgraded, I am happy. The level of deadline drama queens is up this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyons Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 04:38 PM) What's going on with the KW press conference? Anyone listening? Score not broadcasting it live. B&B said they'll talk to their reporter when its done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.