HuskyCaucasian Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Based on Kenny's history, I have NO problem with him trading prospect. Few, if any, have ever grown to be much of a MLB player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:24 AM) Based on Kenny's history, I have NO problem with him trading prospect. Few, if any, have ever grown to be much of a MLB player. Exactly my thought as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetkincaid Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Good God this is killing me!!! Refresh refresh refresh mlbtraderumors.com soxtalk.com refresh refresh refresh COME ON!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
103 mph screwball Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 (edited) KW always gets the players he wants eventually. Being a fan of KW for a decade, I will make my best estimation of what will go down. The biggest names KW has wanted include Griffey, Clemens, ARod,Ichiro, and Manny. Arod is still with a contender. Griffey has been accomplished. Tonight, I predict the Sox will acquire Ichiro and bring Clemens out of retirement. Edited July 30, 2010 by 103 mph screwball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:24 AM) Based on Kenny's history, I have NO problem with him trading prospect. Few, if any, have ever grown to be much of a MLB player. I haven't liked a rookie pitcher as much as I like Hudson since Brandon McCarthy. I have no idea what that means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:15 AM) Man this is killing me. It seems pretty obvious that Hudson has been dealt, but to where and for whom? I hope it's not the Hudson and prospect for Jackson. That would be giving away too much. Cowley or someone else suggests that 2 deals will be made. 1 is Hudson for Jackson, and the other is probably Jackson and others for someone big. Someone on MLBtraderumors suggests Fister and Kotchman or Myers and Berkman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:27 AM) Cowley or someone else suggests that 2 deals will be made. 1 is Hudson for Jackson, and the other is probably Jackson and others for someone big. Someone on MLBtraderumors suggests Fister and Kotchman or Myers and Berkman. Fister and Kotchman would be laughable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Neither would be mega deals. We shouldn't have to give up a massive haul for Myers/Berkman. And who gives a crap about Kochman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:18 AM) And everything, and I mean everything, I've heard/read suggests the exact opposite. The best example is him being in the first Peavy deal last year and then KW pulling his name out of the one that actuallyhappened Bernstein said this, so I did not hear it directly from Cooper, but he said Cooper had mentioned Hudson has a high maintenance mechanics, not meaning injury, but a lot of moving parts, maybe after seeing him more Cooper believes this even more and told KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitoMB345 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 The good news is: I have two seasons of Dexter to keep me tied over til something big breaks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyuen Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:18 AM) And everything, and I mean everything, I've heard/read suggests the exact opposite. The best example is him being in the first Peavy deal last year and then KW pulling his name out of the one that actuallyhappened they do have him rated very highly internally. I heard #2 starter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:29 AM) Fister and Kotchman would be laughable. That's what I was thinking. That does not make the Sox considerably better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (TitoMB @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:32 AM) The good news is: I have two seasons of Dexter to keep me tied over til something big breaks. This post is full of win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:29 AM) Fister and Kotchman would be laughable. yea,thatd suck. just said on espn that jackson for dunn isnt going to happen. nats dont want him at 8+ mil and doesnt look like dunn to sox,wonder who were going to get Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:30 AM) Neither would be mega deals. We shouldn't have to give up a massive haul for Myers/Berkman. And who gives a crap about Kochman. if you put Berkman in against all RH starters and Jones against all LH starters it makes the White Sox order a lot better night in and night out, and Myers, for this year, is a far better option than Hudson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyuen Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (TitoMB @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:32 AM) The good news is: I have two seasons of Dexter to keep me tied over til something big breaks. this last season was fantastic!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie Ball Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 05:32 PM) This post is full of win. Assuming one of them isn't season 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_Thomas Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 I rather keep Jackson and trade for berkman straight up, then make a Meyers/Berkman. Meyers is a douche. This is great drama thank you Kenny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 09:32 AM) if you put Berkman in against all RH starters and Jones against all LH starters it makes the White Sox order a lot better night in and night out, and Myers, for this year, is a far better option than Hudson. That trade makes the Sox a lot better, but we don't need Jackson to get that done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 I'm not a big fan of wife beaters. They don't help conceal armpit sweat when used as an undershirt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:35 AM) That trade makes the Sox a lot better, but we don't need Jackson to get that done. true, but based on Cowley's tweets Hudson/Jackson is set and KW stalled because he was going after something bigger, could be Houston wants Hudson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_Thomas Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:36 AM) true, but based on Cowley's tweets Hudson/Jackson is set and KW stalled because he was going after something bigger, could be Houston wants Hudson Houston has nothing in my opinion that should cost Hudson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 QUOTE (Frank_Thomas35 @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:38 AM) Houston has nothing in my opinion that should cost Hudson. That train would look cool on the concourse after each HR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_Thomas Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 30, 2010 -> 11:40 AM) That train would look cool on the concourse after each HR. lol I would do a Hudson+the Fundamental Deck for Berkman+meyers+the train in a heart beat. Edited July 30, 2010 by Frank_Thomas35 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted July 30, 2010 Share Posted July 30, 2010 Here's some combo's that might be in play... Grienke/Guillen Markakis/Millwood or Guthrie Berkman/Myers Jackson/Laroche Lind/Marcum Trying to think of some other surprise moves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.