SoxAce Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (iamshack @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:23 AM) If you haven't noticed, AJ doesn't exactly have many fans around here right now other than Greg. Everyone's been pulling for Castro to get as many PAs as possible. So don't think AJ's ineptitude has gone unnoticed. But at least AJ serves a purpose defensively! Kotsay serves basically no purpose, other than to cheer up Gordo when he's feeling bad about only getting laid twice the day before. AJ doesn't get as much hate because he has been rock solid defensively and calls a great game for our pitching staff. I'm sure others here would actually like to have him hit and not have, which will probably be, the worst offensive year of his career (unless he really goes Joe Mauer on us from here on out) not to mention having a very low BABIP, but A.J. is not a big problem (+0.5 WAR) at all even with all that and he serves a purpose. I cannot say the same thing about Mark Kotsay other than playing a good 1B every once in a while when Konerko is off. Ozzie talks about flexibility from him... then why hasn't he been in the OF that much, and when he is, why is he so terrible? If you are going to be terrible on the field, at least be good with the bat (and vice-versa) and if Ozzie wants flexibility, a guy only playing one position is not his guy when you have guys like Jones, Lillibridge and Teahen who will and have played multiple. (though brutal defensively, at least gives you a solid bat and has to play cause of salary) Hell even Dayan can play 1B/3B. QUOTE (Ranger @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 12:16 AM) I don't have the numbers on this, but I would guarantee that he's not the worst violator on the team as far as stranding runners. I'd venture to say that AJ, at least, is as bad as it gets. A.J. BRSP% (baserunner scoring percentage) 14% PA less than 2 out baserunners scored: 42% PA runner on second and runner advances: 55% GIDP rate and into: 18% 10 (333 PA) 2 outs and RISP: .344/.447/.563/1.010 Late and close: .188/.220/.333/.553 Overall RISP: .260/.321/.384/.705 Kotsay BRSP% (baserunner scoring percentage) 10% PA less than 2 out baserunners scored: 46% PA runner on second and runner advances: 52% GIDP rate and into: 16% 8 (253 PA) 2 outs and RISP: .160/.222/.360/.582 Late and close: .133/.278/.167/.444 Overall RISP: .148/.281/.315/.596 Edited August 3, 2010 by J.Reedfan8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I understand baseball is build on pitching and defense but if Ranger saying we win or lose because of pitching is a little too much. If we go on and lose a series in the playoffs 1:0, 2:0, 1:0 would you go on and say we lost because of the pitching? Teams need to score runs to win games, and I think it falls equal on pitching and hitting. Let's assume Adam Dunn was trader here on Saturday, do you think Kenny would keep Kotsay on the roster? I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 04:52 AM) I understand baseball is build on pitching and defense but if Ranger saying we win or lose because of pitching is a little too much. If we go on and lose a series in the playoffs 1:0, 2:0, 1:0 would you go on and say we lost because of the pitching? Teams need to score runs to win games, and I think it falls equal on pitching and hitting. Let's assume Adam Dunn was trader here on Saturday, do you think Kenny would keep Kotsay on the roster? I don't think so. If we're shut out, yes, I'd say we lost because of pitching. We lost because the other team flat out pitched better than us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 07:56 AM) If we're shut out, yes, I'd say we lost because of pitching. We lost because the other team flat out pitched better than us. Ok Balta. People would be complaining about our pitching in a 1-0 loss. That's a reasonable statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:23 AM) If you haven't noticed, AJ doesn't exactly have many fans around here right now other than Greg. Everyone's been pulling for Castro to get as many PAs as possible. So don't think AJ's ineptitude has gone unnoticed. But at least AJ serves a purpose defensively! Kotsay serves basically no purpose, other than to cheer up Gordo when he's feeling bad about only getting laid twice the day before. Exactly. Even though AJ is an absolute abomination offensively right now (about Kotsay's equal in that regard), at least he contributes by calling a good game behind the plate for a very good pitching staff. Additionally, you're right in that most people here want Castro to get a lot more chances at the catcher position even despite that. I guess I can see why Kotsay is still on the roster now, but he absolutely has ZERO purpose or reason to be on this team once Teahen is back. But sadly, I'm sure he still will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 09:40 AM) Exactly. Even though AJ is an absolute abomination offensively right now (about Kotsay's equal in that regard), at least he contributes by calling a good game behind the plate for a very good pitching staff. Additionally, you're right in that most people here want Castro to get a lot more chances at the catcher position even despite that. I guess I can see why Kotsay is still on the roster now, but he absolutely has ZERO purpose or reason to be on this team once Teahen is back. But sadly, I'm sure he still will be. At the very least give Castro more starts against LHP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 09:41 AM) At the very least give Castro more starts against LHP. Indeed, I cringe anytime AJ is in over Castro against a lefty starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (J.Reedfan8 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:54 AM) AJ doesn't get as much hate because he has been rock solid defensively and calls a great game for our pitching staff. I'm sure others here would actually like to have him hit and not have, which will probably be, the worst offensive year of his career (unless he really goes Joe Mauer on us from here on out) not to mention having a very low BABIP, but A.J. is not a big problem (+0.5 WAR) at all even with all that and he serves a purpose. I cannot say the same thing about Mark Kotsay other than playing a good 1B every once in a while when Konerko is off. Ozzie talks about flexibility from him... then why hasn't he been in the OF that much, and when he is, why is he so terrible? If you are going to be terrible on the field, at least be good with the bat (and vice-versa) and if Ozzie wants flexibility, a guy only playing one position is not his guy when you have guys like Jones, Lillibridge and Teahen who will and have played multiple. (though brutal defensively, at least gives you a solid bat and has to play cause of salary) Hell even Dayan can play 1B/3B. A.J. BRSP% (baserunner scoring percentage) 14% PA less than 2 out baserunners scored: 42% PA runner on second and runner advances: 55% GIDP rate and into: 18% 10 (333 PA) 2 outs and RISP: .344/.447/.563/1.010 Late and close: .188/.220/.333/.553 Overall RISP: .260/.321/.384/.705 Kotsay BRSP% (baserunner scoring percentage) 10% PA less than 2 out baserunners scored: 46% PA runner on second and runner advances: 52% GIDP rate and into: 16% 8 (253 PA) 2 outs and RISP: .160/.222/.360/.582 Late and close: .133/.278/.167/.444 Overall RISP: .148/.281/.315/.596 It's amazing what your eyes don't see, isn't it? A.J.'s actually been quite good with RISP and 2 outs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 02:24 PM) It's amazing what your eyes don't see, isn't it? A.J.'s actually been quite good with RISP and 2 outs. 32 at bats, 4 2b, 1 HR, 11 hits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:24 PM) It's amazing what your eyes don't see, isn't it? A.J.'s actually been quite good with RISP and 2 outs. QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:27 PM) 32 at bats, 4 2b, 1 HR, 11 hits. It is not hard... to be worse than Mark Kotsay with RISP overall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (Ranger @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 12:48 AM) So Mark Kotsay may cost the White Sox the division all by himself? That's ridiculous. Again, these season will be won or lost on pitching and there's no way around it. If they don't pitch well, they will not win anything. You know, Mark Kotsay does have quite a negative WAR (I think it's -0.8). And UZR has given him credit for his defense, but his hitting is just so bad... The constant defense of Mark Kotsay is getting old. He sucks, there is no defending a .650 OPS from the DH spot, none. And this whole luck crap? Even if Mark Kotsay wasn't unlucky, xBABIP has him at .270ish because he's got a 16% line drive percentage and he hits weak ground balls and fly balls frequently. So even if he wasn't unlucky, he'd be a .260ish hitter with a .750 OPS. You want that as your DH for 1/3 of your games? I sure as hell don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 The constant defense of Mark Kotsay is getting old. He sucks, there is no defending a .650 OPS from the DH spot, none. Ranger's arguments were new, not old, and rather interesting involving the chemistry aspect of baseball. I welcome any chance to learn more about the clubhouse and some takes from those on the inside. I'd rather have Viciedo than Kotsay, Teahen and/or Lillibridge though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeFabregas Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Another hit for Brent today. Does he make any outs? His success baffles me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Lillibridge and Viciedo are definitely fun to watch hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:55 PM) Ranger's arguments were new, not old, and rather interesting involving the chemistry aspect of baseball. I welcome any chance to learn more about the clubhouse and some takes from those on the inside. I'd rather have Viciedo than Kotsay, Teahen and/or Lillibridge though. If you can convince Ozzie that Kotsay shouldn't be starting against right handed pitchers, the Sox can afford to keep him. But when Teahen gets back, Kotsay may cost Viciedo or Lillibridge a spot on the team. Both of those have done positive things for the team on the field. I do believe that Kotsay brings good chemistry and the guys on the team like him, but you can't risk on-field performance. The team is here to win ball games, not to make friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:23 PM) If you can convince Ozzie that Kotsay shouldn't be starting against right handed pitchers, the Sox can afford to keep him. But when Teahen gets back, Kotsay may cost Viciedo or Lillibridge a spot on the team. Both of those have done positive things for the team on the field. I do believe that Kotsay brings good chemistry and the guys on the team like him, but you can't risk on-field performance. The team is here to win ball games, not to make friends. Put him on the damn DL and let him travel with the team...who cares... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 08:23 PM) If you can convince Ozzie that Kotsay shouldn't be starting against right handed pitchers, the Sox can afford to keep him. But when Teahen gets back, Kotsay may cost Viciedo or Lillibridge a spot on the team. Both of those have done positive things for the team on the field. I do believe that Kotsay brings good chemistry and the guys on the team like him, but you can't risk on-field performance. The team is here to win ball games, not to make friends. I agree with you. I just thought Ranger's arguments were a new perspective on the matter or one with a little insight since he has naturally has sources on the team and in the clubhouse. The bottom line probably is he's not going anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 http://www.baseballmusings.com/cgi-bin/Lin...345&Model=0 Your team would score 3.2 runs per game with a lineup of nothing but Mark Kotsays, haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:24 PM) Put him on the damn DL and let him travel with the team...who cares... Should have just made him the first base coach while Harold was recovering from his knee surgery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 02:36 PM) I just thought Ranger's arguments were a new perspective on the matter or one with a little insight since he has naturally has sources on the team and in the clubhouse. The bottom line probably is he's not going anywhere. Whatever. Jim Thome is the ultimate clubhouse guy and they had no problem dumping him yet they can't find it in them to get rid of a terrible player like Kotsay?! Bizarro world. Edited August 3, 2010 by BigSqwert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:40 PM) Whatever. Jim Thome is the ultimate clubhouse guy and they had no problem dumping him yet they can't find it in them to get rid of a terrible player like Kotsay?! Bizarro world. Fantastic point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 I still can't believe how many people buy into the chemistry argument. Winning brings chemistry, not the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeFabregas Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (greg775 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 01:55 PM) Ranger's arguments were new, not old, and rather interesting involving the chemistry aspect of baseball. I welcome any chance to learn more about the clubhouse and some takes from those on the inside. I'd rather have Viciedo than Kotsay, Teahen and/or Lillibridge though. Hire Kotsay as an expensive coach if he's so great for chemistry. The chemistry argument is the last bastion for defending a bad player. You can use it to defend any personnel move. Maybe we should just assume that Ozzie and Kenny know best about everything and then have only descriptive (not prescriptive) discussions on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 02:40 PM) Whatever. Jim Thome is the ultimate clubhouse guy and they had no problem dumping him yet they can't find it in them to get rid of a terrible player like Kotsay?! Bizarro world. You were never in that clubhouse, the guys hated Jim Thome for being too nice. Ozzie Guillen doesn't like nice guys, they finish last. Grinders, on the other hand.... Edited August 3, 2010 by chw42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Aug 3, 2010 -> 02:41 PM) Fantastic point. Yeah that actually is a really good point, I never thought of it that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.