Balta1701 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 12:14 AM) Not exactly. If a player is on the 40 man roster, he has to clear waivers in order to be traded, so Washington would be even more limited in who they could get back from the Sox. Which means...no Viciedo, no Jackson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 He's been claimed by an unknown team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 03:25 PM) He's been claimed by an unknown team. I'd love if it was Kenny just to **** with Rizzo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox2334 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 ya since other al teams wouldnt block w sox lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 04:25 PM) He's been claimed by an unknown team. Never believed the report that he got through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 Rizzo would immediately pull him back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 04:40 PM) Rizzo would immediately pull him back. He still has 2 days to try to work out a trade with the claiming team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 (edited) Can a player be placed through waivers twice? Like can the Nats pull Dunn off waivers, and then run him through again? Edited August 5, 2010 by JoeCoolMan24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 03:48 PM) Can a player be placed through waivers twice? Like can the Nats pull Dunn off waivers, and then run him through again? No they cannot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 04:53 PM) No they cannot. I believe you can put him on irrevocable waivers the 2nd time though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 04:06 PM) I believe you can put him on irrevocable waivers the 2nd time though. Well I don't think Rizzo would want to do that. At the least, he gets two picks for Dunn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 03:48 PM) Can a player be placed through waivers twice? Like can the Nats pull Dunn off waivers, and then run him through again? Nope, once they are claimed and pulled back, that is it for the revocable status. Also once someone clears, they can be traded for the rest of the trading period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWhiteSoxinNJ Posted August 5, 2010 Share Posted August 5, 2010 (edited) A player can be put on waivers for the 2nd time, but if he is claimed, he can NOT be pulled back. Heard Ken Rosenthal on MLB Tonight (Tonight). Edited August 5, 2010 by AWhiteSoxinNJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 QUOTE (AWhiteSoxinNJ @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 06:34 PM) A player can be put on waivers for the 2nd time, but if he is claimed, he can NOT be pulled back. Heard Ken Rosenthal on MLB Tonight (Tonight). So then a player is just given to a team, right? Since the team who placed him on waivers has NO leverage in the deal at all, he is just given to the team then yes? Unless the team receiving him wants to throw the other team a crappy prospect just in good faith, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Aug 6, 2010 -> 04:14 AM) So then a player is just given to a team, right? Since the team who placed him on waivers has NO leverage in the deal at all, he is just given to the team then yes? Unless the team receiving him wants to throw the other team a crappy prospect just in good faith, right? If the waivers aren't irrevocable, the player can be pulled back if if the waiving team wants to pull them back. If they are irrevocable, the player can be had by whatever team has first priority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Aug 6, 2010 -> 04:14 AM) So then a player is just given to a team, right? Since the team who placed him on waivers has NO leverage in the deal at all, he is just given to the team then yes? Unless the team receiving him wants to throw the other team a crappy prospect just in good faith, right? Or they want to turn that prospect into cash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That funky motion Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 David Kaplan tweets that the Dodgers got the waiver claim on Dunn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 QUOTE (AWhiteSoxinNJ @ Aug 5, 2010 -> 07:34 PM) A player can be put on waivers for the 2nd time, but if he is claimed, he can NOT be pulled back. Heard Ken Rosenthal on MLB Tonight (Tonight). There are 2 types of waivers: revocable and irrevocable. In August you normally think about revocable and these can only be used once. If pulled back then he can be placed on irrevocable waivers. So if claimed, he cannot be pulled back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottyDo Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 QUOTE (That funky motion @ Aug 6, 2010 -> 09:07 PM) David Kaplan tweets that the Dodgers got the waiver claim on Dunn. Block on the Giants? They don't really have the space for him, do they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Aug 8, 2010 -> 12:13 AM) Block on the Giants? They don't really have the space for him, do they? If they could move Manny's salary... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 8, 2010 -> 12:53 PM) If they could move Manny's salary... That's what I was thinking they would have Dunn replace Manny.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted August 8, 2010 Share Posted August 8, 2010 QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Aug 7, 2010 -> 11:13 PM) Block on the Giants? They don't really have the space for him, do they? They know they won't give Dunn away now, so it was an easy block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.