Quin Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 So, with the Sox having Peavy-Buehrle-Floyd-Danks-Jackson-Sale all under contract next year, this made me wonder. 1. The Sox really love some pitching depth. 2. Sale is the 3rd prospect put on the fast track to the bigs; Gordon, Mitchell looked like he was going to, and now Sale. 3. Kenny probably wants Sale as a starter, not a lefty set up. 4. Kenny floated the idea of the sixth starter around before, I believe in 2006 with McCarthy. 5. Lastly, Ozzie hates back to back righties or lefties. Now, for some number crunches. Buehrle Career Splits (ERA more than a full run lower on 5+ days rest) I Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO/9 SO/BB 2 Days,GS 1 0 1.000 2.57 1 1 0 0 0 0 7.0 6 2 2 0 1 0 5 1 0 0 30 1.000 6.4 5.00 3 Days,GS 4 1 .800 2.70 6 6 0 0 0 0 40.0 45 13 12 6 9 0 24 1 0 0 163 1.350 5.4 2.67 4 Days,GS 72 58 .554 4.34 175 175 0 12 3 0 1152.1 1286 608 556 139 282 21 649 20 4 13 4878 1.361 5.1 2.30 5 Days,GS 49 36 .576 3.22 106 106 0 10 3 0 739.0 723 302 264 76 151 10 422 21 8 4 3018 1.183 5.1 2.79 6+ Days,GS 16 9 .640 3.41 35 35 0 4 2 0 227.0 210 98 86 24 46 3 124 7 0 3 913 1.128 4.9 2.70 Peavy Career Splits (Same here) I Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO/9 SO/BB 3 Days,GS 1 1 .500 8.10 2 2 0 0 0 0 10.0 10 9 9 2 5 0 11 1 0 0 46 1.500 9.9 2.20 4 Days,GS 49 38 .563 3.82 119 119 0 4 2 0 746.0 693 332 317 84 258 23 737 24 3 16 3151 1.275 8.9 2.86 5 Days,GS 35 27 .565 2.78 81 81 0 3 1 0 531.1 419 176 164 47 146 9 544 18 1 8 2132 1.063 9.2 3.73 6+ Days,GS 17 8 .680 2.91 30 30 0 1 1 0 182.1 145 63 59 16 65 1 167 7 2 4 746 1.152 8.2 2.57 Gavin 2010 Splits (His career numbers were all over the place due to his Phillies days) I Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO/9 SO/BB 4 Days,GS 3 5 .375 4.19 12 12 0 1 0 0 77.1 73 37 36 5 23 0 56 3 0 4 321 1.241 6.5 2.43 5 Days,GS 5 2 .714 2.13 9 9 0 0 0 0 55.0 50 18 13 3 15 1 50 0 0 2 225 1.182 8.2 3.33 6+ Days,GS 0 1 .000 5.25 2 2 0 0 0 0 12.0 15 7 7 0 4 0 11 0 0 1 52 1.583 8.3 2.75 Edwin Jackson 2009 Splits (Better indicator than 2010, since it was in our division) I Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO/9 SO/BB 4 Days,GS 6 6 .500 4.05 17 17 0 0 0 0 106.2 104 53 48 14 34 1 72 4 0 3 447 1.294 6.1 2.12 5 Days,GS 7 2 .778 3.39 14 14 0 1 0 0 93.0 89 36 35 10 30 2 81 0 0 3 387 1.280 7.8 2.70 6+ Days,GS 0 1 .000 1.88 2 2 0 0 0 0 14.1 7 4 3 3 6 0 8 1 0 0 56 0.907 5.0 1.33 John Danks 2010 Splits I Split W L W-L% ERA G GS GF CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR BB IBB SO HBP BK WP BF WHIP SO/9 SO/BB 4 Days,GS 5 4 .556 3.94 9 9 0 1 1 0 59.1 49 26 26 4 18 0 53 1 0 1 244 1.129 8.0 2.94 5 Days,GS 5 3 .625 2.50 10 10 0 0 0 0 68.1 51 19 19 3 23 0 42 1 0 0 266 1.083 5.5 1.83 6+ Days,GS 1 1 .500 4.12 3 3 0 0 0 0 19.2 20 11 9 1 5 1 19 0 0 0 83 1.271 8.7 3.80 Each starter gets 27 starts as opposed to 32.4 starts, and assuming they go 7 innings each time out due to their new found rest, they could still get around 190 innings that Danks and Buehrle covet. Benefits: 1. Keeping pitchers healthy - Peavy's shoulder issue - Danks' hand blister last year - Floyd's hip - Buehrle having a lot of innings on his arm 2. Allowing the starters to go deeper each time means more rest for Thornton/Pena/Sergio/Jenks/Putz (assuming he could return)/Threets. In this case, Linebrink is either DFA'd with only one year on his contract or traded for nothing. With more rest, Putz/Jenks/Thornton/Sergio could all switch off who comes out, making the games all the tougher when it gets to the pen. 3. Better performance. We've seen what good pitching does this year, but what if it could get even better. 4. Pitchers fresher than other teams for playoffs. 5. Ease Sale into starter role. Draw Backs: 1. One less man in the pen. Essentially the Linebrink role, if the Sox would cut him. 2. The better performances could drive up prices for guys like Danks and EJax. Also, for what it's worth the only two teams I could see pulling this off would be the Sox and Rays, and I would really like to see the Sox think about this next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 If I had to guess, Sale will be starting 2011 in AAA or AA, while they try to work on his wildness. He hasn't even gotten a major league batter out yet; why rush the kid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (knightni @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 03:28 AM) If I had to guess, Sale will be starting 2011 in AAA or AA, while they try to work on his wildness. Kid walked 14(!!!) people in 103 innings in college (1.2 BB per 9) just this year. He pitched only 10.1 innings in the minors with a ridiculous 19:6 SO/BB rate pitching as a reliever which he is not used to, not to mention going straight from A+ to AAA (which is understandable of a bit of 'wildness'). He might have some flaws, but wild isn't one of them. I agree however there is no chance he sniffs the rotation before the 2011 season, if at all (unless there is alot of injuries in the rotation or if he is just dominating people that forces the sox hand) I think he starts in A+ or AA in the rotation next season. If he starts in AA, that'll further help my prediction to JPN about the Barons being good again in 2011. Edited August 9, 2010 by J.Reedfan8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 Well, he was and has been wild. He's not mlb ready for at least another season and a half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted August 9, 2010 Author Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 04:28 AM) If I had to guess, Sale will be starting 2011 in AAA or AA, while they try to work on his wildness. He hasn't even gotten a major league batter out yet; why rush the kid? I should put a footnote here; This would all depend on Jackson not being traded, Peavy being healthy, and Sale showing he can be a MLB pitcher this year and a starter in the AFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 05:22 AM) Well, he was and has been wild. He's not mlb ready for at least another season and a half. he has thrown to 2 batters in his entire MLB career Knight, labeling him as wild is a little presumptive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 If Peavy is healthy, or projected to ready by the time spring starts, I really think we see a trade of one of our starters. Regardless remember that contracts start coming up after 2011. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 10:06 AM) If Peavy is healthy, or projected to ready by the time spring starts, I really think we see a trade of one of our starters. Regardless remember that contracts start coming up after 2011. Nothing would surprise me with Kenny...but without an obvious takeover candidate...and no, Sale doesn't count, I seriously don't expect him to make a move that makes the pitching staff worse. He might go 2007 style and do a deal that brings in significantly more young pitching, but the ideal guy to do that with is Jackson, and I still doubt that any team is going to line up to be the 4th team to trade for him in 2 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paint it Black Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 No. Why would you want to take away starts from Danks/Floyd (or whoever your two best starters are)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 02:06 PM) If Peavy is healthy, or projected to ready by the time spring starts, I really think we see a trade of one of our starters. Regardless remember that contracts start coming up after 2011. Pitching wins games (coupled with a good defense IMO) and once you have set up a dominanting starting staff you shouldn't mess with it. Trading one of those guys would be a mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 10:08 AM) Pitching wins games (coupled with a good defense IMO) and once you have set up a dominanting starting staff you shouldn't mess with it. Trading one of those guys would be a mistake Doesn't seem like Kenny to want to trade away great starting pitching. It was just this past off season where he was trying to assemble the greatest pitching staff ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 As always, a 6 man rotation is just a terrible idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 02:20 AM) Draw Backs: 1. One less man in the pen. Essentially the Linebrink role, if the Sox would cut him. 2. The better performances could drive up prices for guys like Danks and EJax. You could argue that it would hurt their trade value, too. A team may not want them during a pennant run because you wouldn't be able to expect them to pitch on a normal routine for anyone but that of a 6-man rotation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 11:18 AM) As always, a 6 man rotation is just a terrible idea. On a 26 man roster, it could be a spectacular idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 02:20 AM) Draw Backs: 1. One less man in the pen. Essentially the Linebrink role, if the Sox would cut him. 2. The better performances could drive up prices for guys like Danks and EJax. You are throwing a rookie into the rotation who will probably have several short outings, so that extra person in the bullpen would be even more necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 9, 2010 Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 12:51 PM) You are throwing a rookie into the rotation who will probably have several short outings, so that extra person in the bullpen would be even more necessary. On the other hand...if the other 5 guys in your rotation are significantly better on extra rest, then they might last longer and actually cut the innings the bullpen needs to take over on their starts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted August 9, 2010 Author Share Posted August 9, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 12:05 PM) On the other hand...if the other 5 guys in your rotation are significantly better on extra rest, then they might last longer and actually cut the innings the bullpen needs to take over on their starts. Going back and looking at Danks: He pitches 6.81 IP per start on 5 days rest, and 6.56 on 4 days rest. With only 2 innings needed from the bullpen, Pena and Santos could pickup Sale if he faltered and get it to the back of the pen. Also, someone said taking starts from Floyd and Danks. Wouldn't it be better for them to have 5 less starts if the quality of the other 27 starts is longer outings and with ERA's in the 2's instead of the 3's and 4's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.