Jump to content

SOX @ Twinkies Danks (12-8 3.19) vs. Baker (10-9 4.76)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 674
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (mcgrad70 @ Aug 17, 2010 -> 09:39 PM)
You're going to be hearing about it for a long time, so get use to it pal.

It was a terrible trade on many levels.

I wouldn't call it terrible.

 

Sure, there are $ implications that make it at least questionable.

 

But...

 

In his three starts for Chicago, Jackson has allowed three earned runs in 20 innings of work for a 1.35 ERA. He's also struck out 24 batters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Aug 18, 2010 -> 02:40 AM)
Except it wasn't.

 

You don't know that, just like those thinking it was a a good trade for the Sox don't know that. My main belief is they can probably put up similar numbers next season, and we need that 8 million dollars to upgrade other spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Aug 17, 2010 -> 09:42 PM)
You don't know that, just like those thinking it was a a good trade for the Sox don't know that. My main belief is they can probably put up similar numbers next season, and we need that 8 million dollars to upgrade other spots.

Up to this point, it hasn't been a bad trade. In fact, it's been a great trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...