Jordan4life_2007 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:42 AM) Crawford was a 6.8 WAR player this season. That is outstanding. (Konerko was a 4.2) He's worth $20M per. By this logic guys like Adrian Beltre and Jose Bautista are worth 20 million. I love the WAR stat. But no way in hell Crawford is worth 20 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 I'm not surprised that the Sox are "targeting" Crawford. Why wouldn't they? The trouble is, like many other posters have said, the Sox most likely cannot compete with a few other teams out there that would spend a lot more to get him. The Sox may very well make an offer, and they may actually offer more years than they typically do. But, I can't see them offering more than $12-$15 million per season. A few other teams out there wouldn't hesitate to offer $18 million+ a year for 4 or 5 years. Someone else mentioned that Dunn would be a nice consolation prize. Absolutely, but he'd want to play 1st base. Maybe the Sox will go after him as their new 1st baseman. That would probably mean Paulie's not coming back though. Can you imagine how small Dunn would make the Cell look? Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (South Side Fireworks Man @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 06:18 PM) Has Crawford ever even played RF? His arm isn't very well suited for it and I seem to remember years ago he was reluctant to play CF. Even if the Sox felt he could play RF despite his arm I'm not sure if Crawford would be that receptive to doing it. If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. Edited October 8, 2010 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxrwhite Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Is Crawford old, washed up or coming off serious injury? No? Then we will not get him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (Brian @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 10:40 PM) Us: Carl, we offer you 5 years at $60 million. Carl: No Us: Oh well, we tried LOL!!!! Totally true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 06:52 AM) If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. AAAAHHHHHH!!!! The stupidity in that comment is ridiculous. I wish nothing but the worst on all of the Guillens. Edited October 8, 2010 by Milkman delivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LVSoxFan Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Since it came up, if Paulie's not coming back, who would be the leading suitors for him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 03:46 AM) By this logic guys like Adrian Beltre and Jose Bautista are worth 20 million. I love the WAR stat. But no way in hell Crawford is worth 20 million. In addition, Crawford's high WAR number is largely due to his fantastic defense. That's fine and dandy, but the White Sox are absolutely starved for offense, and those are the numbers they should be most concerned with, especially if it costs 20% of your payroll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (LVSoxFan @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 04:15 PM) Since it came up, if Paulie's not coming back, who would be the leading suitors for him? Boston, LA teams, Arizona, Twins (if Morneau can't recover) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:52 AM) If they acquired Crawford, and I believe that is a gigantic longshot, the Sox have not given another team's FA more than $20 million total in 14 years, I think he would play LF, Pierre CF and Rios RF, assuming that didn't mean the end of Alex Rios with the White Sox. Oney hinted in his tweets the White Sox may get what he termed a "real" CF. I thought Rios was fine, but apparently Ozzie projects him more as a RF. Oh hell no....that means we're going after Torii Hunter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:22 AM) Boston, LA teams, Arizona, Twins (if Morneau can't recover) Wouldn't it be fun to see him and Thome bash our brains in next year? Ugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 05:24 PM) Wouldn't it be fun to see him and Thome bash our brains in next year? Ugh I'm sure Bobby Jenks or whoever is pitching would continue to give him fastball after fastball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (sircaffey @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:21 AM) In addition, Crawford's high WAR number is largely due to his fantastic defense. That's fine and dandy, but the White Sox are absolutely starved for offense, and those are the numbers they should be most concerned with, especially if it costs 20% of your payroll. Crawford was actually really good offensively this year, and you may be able to assume more offense from him moving from a great pitchers park to a hitters park. He actually is beginning to remind me more and more of Johnny Damon as he goes along, but I think he's better too. Edited October 8, 2010 by witesoxfan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 11:27 AM) I'm sure Bobby Jenks or whoever is pitching would continue to give him fastball after fastball. If they can keep it up over his hands, they will be fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Oct 7, 2010 -> 04:31 PM) We'll land Crawford in 12 years. so true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHITESOXRANDY Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 I'd be willing to bet that Crawford wouldn"t sign with the Sox even if they were the highest bidder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxt Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Haven't the Sox done this before, throwing the name of a big name free agent out there for the media to jump all over? Inevitably, the Sox offer is rebuffed but management can say that "they went hard after that guy". This is more of a PR stunt than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Has it occured to anyone, through all the anger, that PART of the reason we fall short on free agents is that the team is willing to pay what they see as the value of the player, and not overpay? That its an organizational philosophy? Because I find that much more likely than the idea that they do it for publicity. This team has been upper echelon in payroll for 5 seasons in a row now, its not like they don't spend money, so it seems silly to try to "fake" interest in signing people. People here seem to be letting their frustrations with the results of 2010 color their judgment. The whole publicity stunt thing just doesn't make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:02 PM) "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 12:29 PM) Has it occured to anyone, through all the anger, that PART of the reason we fall short on free agents is that the team is willing to pay what they see as the value of the player, and not overpay? That its an organizational philosophy? Because I find that much more likely than the idea that they do it for publicity. This team has been upper echelon in payroll for 5 seasons in a row now, its not like they don't spend money, so it seems silly to try to "fake" interest in signing people. People here seem to be letting their frustrations with the results of 2010 color their judgment. The whole publicity stunt thing just doesn't make sense. I'm sure it's a thought that crosses their mind. I doubt Kenny would have someone throw a rumor like that around, I don't see him wasting his time with stuff like that but I'm sure that if they did miss out on someone they would want people to know that they tried to save grace a bit, just look at the Torri Hunter situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 01:10 PM) I'm sure it's a thought that crosses their mind. I doubt Kenny would have someone throw a rumor like that around, I don't see him wasting his time with stuff like that but I'm sure that if they did miss out on someone they would want people to know that they tried to save grace a bit, just look at the Torri Hunter situation. Well sure, if they do fall short, they want to spin it that way. That's after the fact. But the idea that it is the prime motivation just seems ridiculous to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattZakrowski Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 02:02 PM) "The Sox updated their roster by buying the most expensive Slappy McSlapperson out there for $18 mil a year." "They've now acquired 3/4 of the speediest slappiest hitters out there." In other news, the Twins win the 2011 ALC Division by 12 games." Crawford hit 19 homeruns this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 8, 2010 -> 05:41 PM) If they can keep it up over his hands, they will be fine. The same Paul Konerko that was the best fastball hitter in the majors? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Losing Quentin and Konerko and replacing them with Crawford does not sound like a good idea. I love the people that say the White Sox are cheap yet they can have a $100M while being cheap. Do they want Crawford, I am sure they do. Will they overpay to get him, no. Will Sox fans be pissed that they did not overpay, yes. I am really glad they did not sign Hunter, Fukodome and Alphonso Soriano, so I will give them the benefit of the doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.