Jump to content

OBAMA/TRUMPCARE MEGATHREAD


Texsox

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 24, 2017 -> 04:31 PM)
This is so not surprising. The GOP is not the party of unity. They have no problem voting against the rest of their party when they don't believe in something.

Politicians are worried about getting re-elected. If Trump were more popular, they would have had the votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 24, 2017 -> 03:31 PM)
This is so not surprising. The GOP is not the party of unity. They have no problem voting against the rest of their party when they don't believe in something.

 

They were sure united in voting against everything the Obama administration threw out there over the last 8 years. The fact that, as a bloc they do not share the same vision on health care does not a party of free thinkers make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/201...re-trump-214947

Inside the GOP's health care debacle

 

 

Donald Trump had heard enough about policy and process. It was Thursday afternoon and members of the House Freedom Caucus were peppering the president with wonkish concerns about the American Health Care Act—the language that would leave Obamacare’s “essential health benefits” in place, the community rating provision that limited what insurers could charge certain patients, and whether the next two steps of Speaker Paul Ryan’s master plan were even feasible—when Trump decided to cut them off.

 

"Forget about the little s***," Trump said, according to multiple sources in the room. "Let's focus on the big picture here."

 

The group of roughly 30 House conservatives, gathered around a mammoth, oval-shaped conference table in the Cabinet Room of the White House, exchanged disapproving looks. Trump wanted to emphasize the political ramifications of the bill's defeat; specifically, he said, it would derail his first-term agenda and imperil his prospects for reelection in 2020. The lawmakers nodded and said they understood. And yet they were disturbed by his dismissiveness. For many of the members, the "little s***" meant the policy details that could make or break their support for the bill—and have far-reaching implications for their constituents and the country.

 

"We’re talking about one-fifth of our economy," a member told me afterward.

 

Ultimately, the meeting failed to move any votes. Two Freedom Caucus members—Brian Babin and Ted Poe, both of Texas—told the president that they had switched to yes, but their decisions had already been registered with White House vote-counters prior to sitting down with Trump. (Their colleagues didn't appreciate the gesture, feeling that Babin and Poe were trying to score points with the president at their expense.) Upon returning to Capitol Hill, the Freedom Caucus gathered in a meeting room inside the Rayburn office building, discussed Trump's admonitions to them and took another vote. The tally had not changed: Of the group’s roughly three dozen members, two-thirds remained opposed, with only five or six of those saying they were "soft" in that stance.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good article on the background of the negotiations that went on.

 

C7u6QwfV4AAl6wI.jpg

 

Wapo has a good look inside too. Trump kept asking aides "is this really a good bill?"

https://t.co/glhT4Kwe6w

 

And basketball fans got treated to pre purchased ad buys celebrating Obamacare repeal last night.

https://twitter.com/Deadspin/status/845453917064441857

 

The kicker on this is that Comstock was one of the public no votes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He mows says he has been saying all along the best thing is to let Obaamcare implode because then they will get the better deal. OK.

 

The problem is his administration is going to do whatever they can to make Obamacare implode so he can get on with wealth care. No mention of fixing the problems with Obamacare seems rather puzzling until you' realize this is US politics. Like was mentioned previously, the POTUS actually wishing for a scenario that would undoubtedly cost American lives is unprecedented.

 

Why isn't fixing Obamacare a consideration for the right if they are so concerned with US citizens, and want them to have better, cheaper health care?

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 25, 2017 -> 09:42 AM)
He mows says he has been saying all along the best thing is to let Obaamcare implode because then they will get the better deal. OK.

 

The problem is his administration is going to do whatever they can to make Obamacare implode so he can get on with wealth care. No mention of fixing the problems with Obamacare seems rather puzzling until you' realize this is US politics. Like was mentioned previously, the POTUS actually wishing for a scenario that would undoubtedly cost American lives is unprecedented.

 

Why isn't fixing Obamacare a consideration for the right if they are so concerned with US citizens, and want them to have better, cheaper health care?

 

There's an ongoing lawsuit right now where House Republicans were suing to have the courts rule that the ACA subsidies weren't properly funded. If Trump really is going to gleefully and openly cheer for the collapse of health care for millions of Americans, this is the easiest way. He can choose to instruct his government to simply not defend the lawsuit in court.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/obam...-lawsuit-231724

 

FWIW the CBO has also recently said that the ACA exchanges are stable, so unless this lawsuit were to succeed, ACA won't be collapsing in on itself before exploding any time soon even with Congress and the WH trying to break and cause harm to Americans who rely on it every way they can. Trump cutting all advertising for the exchange enrollment period is believed to be the cause of lower than expected signups this year, and there's a federal investigation of that underway.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Mar 25, 2017 -> 09:50 AM)
There's an ongoing lawsuit right now where House Republicans were suing to have the courts rule that the ACA subsidies weren't properly funded. If Trump really is going to gleefully and openly cheer for the collapse of health care for millions of Americans, this is the easiest way. He can choose to instruct his government to simply not defend the lawsuit in court.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/obam...-lawsuit-231724

 

FWIW the CBO has also recently said that the ACA exchanges are stable, so unless this lawsuit were to succeed, ACA won't be collapsing in on itself before exploding any time soon even with Congress and the WH trying to break and cause harm to Americans who rely on it every way they can. Trump cutting all advertising for the exchange enrollment period is believed to be the cause of lower than expected signups this year, and there's a federal investigation of that underway.

 

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/tru...fate/ar-BByIkWN

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/20...surance-status/

President Trump’s executive order restraining Obamacare is already in effect at the IRS. The IRS will (now) accept tax returns that do not declare health insurance status.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/obamacare-explod...1--finance.html

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Mar 27, 2017 -> 11:53 AM)
Seeing on Twitter that Virginia and Kansas now look likely to take Medicaid expansion.

 

edit: said Nebraska meant kansas.

 

Well, KS pretty much has run out of financing options at the state and local level.

 

The government there is sub Trump level in terms of popularity.

 

 

http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-go...e141024998.html

Brownback's office STILL talking veto if bill passes to get to his desk

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Healthcare flop

Republicans mostly blame the U.S. Congress, and not President Donald Trump or party leaders, for failing to pass their party's healthcare overhaul, according to a March 25-28 Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll.

Republicans mostly blame the U.S. Congress, and not President Donald Trump or party leaders, for failing to pass their party's healthcare overhaul, according to a Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll released on Wednesday.

 

The March 25-28 poll asked who should take responsibility for the failure of the American Health Care Act (AHCA), which Republican leaders pulled from consideration last week without a vote.

 

Besides Trump, who backed the bill, and House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan, who was expected to shepherd it through Congress, the poll asked if people blamed House Republicans, House Democrats or the media.

 

Republicans were most likely to blame Congress. Some 26 percent said House Democrats were most responsible and 23 percent blamed House Republicans. Another 13 percent blamed Trump and 10 percent blamed Ryan. Only 8 percent blamed the media. (Graphic: tmsnrt.rs/2nhOmjI PDF link: tmsnrt.rs/2nhtM30)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Mar 27, 2017 -> 12:53 PM)
Seeing on Twitter that Virginia and Kansas now look likely to take Medicaid expansion.

 

edit: said Nebraska meant kansas.

 

Brownback vetoed it.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/hea...m=.ecd7c52ff750

 

There's a bit of a war going on between the increasingly more moderate Republican Congress in Kansas and Brownback since Brownback broke the entire state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only need five combined votes in the KS State House and Senate to override Brownback's veto.

Lots of KS hospitals are lobbying hard for passage.

 

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/201...hoo&ref=yfp

 

 

Score another win for Koch Industries!

 

 

Brownback’s veto, which was announced Thursday morning on Twitter, had been highly anticipated and comes amid speculation that he will take a job in President Donald Trump’s administration. The Kansas Legislature has 30 days to override Brownback’s veto, which would require two-thirds majorities in both the House and Senate.

 

Rep. Susan Concannon, a Beloit Republican who has pushed for expansion for several years, rejected Brownback’s effort to tie the issue to abortion.

 

“It’s not an abortion bill despite some comments that I heard this morning,” she said. “That was out of left field. You talk about moving targets, there’s a new one for us.”

 

House Majority Leader Don Hineman, a Dighton Republican, said he still felt there was a sentiment in both chambers to find a way to make Medicaid expansion happen.

 

“In the end it comes back to protecting those who are in that gap and cannot afford coverage,” Hineman said. “There’s a benefit, not only to them directly, but to the state to have them covered and have them on a path to better health.”

 

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-go...l#storylink=cpy

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is really disheartening that he he got through to me. Like, Sessions, okay, he had a bad reputation, you can see how that gets through. But usually a Price would have felt pressure to just back away himself ala Daschle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...