lostfan Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 1, 2013 -> 02:00 PM) The exchanges, which went online Tuesday morning, have been riddled with technical difficulties in states across the country. The administration has said that the glitches consumers are encountering will be ironed out by Tuesday afternoon. If you believe this I have some Detroit municipal debt to sell you at par. GMAFB... This is why what the Republicans are doing is assinine. Let this get implemented and let it fail from its own weight. So are you sure this doesn't have anything to do with millions of people trying to access the website at the same time because they're trying to sign up??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (lostfan @ Oct 1, 2013 -> 10:00 PM) So are you sure this doesn't have anything to do with millions of people trying to access the website at the same time because they're trying to sign up??? I am referring to it being fixed tomorrow. I am sure it was overloaded. Not saying anything about the site or the service it offers. Something this large and complicated will be hard to fix in 24 hrs. That's all i was saying. I would feel the same for a comparable problem with a private company. As an aside, I was watching the ABC news last night and they mentioned that these exchanges do not include the deductibles in the pricing of the plans....Is that true? And why would that be the case? Edited October 2, 2013 by Cknolls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I can't really speak for others but when I look at my prices during open enrollment, I see nothing about deductibles, it just says the monthly cost for my premium. I don't really see why this would or should be any different. Almost nobody knows the ACTUAL price of their health insurance. It's a lot more than they actually pay. Ideally we wouldn't make businesses pay this and all pay into the same system but that's communist or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 1, 2013 -> 09:03 PM) Not sure that flies. Depends on how the law is written, exact phraseology used. So maybe not a sub, just a second company. Would they stop someone from opening up a new company? There are legit applications for that. I remember when a small under 25 employee company I worked for branched out to contract manufacturing. We set up a new corporation because we did not wish to combine for competitive reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I kinda misspoke on my last post... I do know what my deductible is. There's different deductibles in the exchanges like everyone else's insurance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 1, 2013 -> 04:43 PM) One thing I think we'll find in terms of "job-killing" by Obamacare is, there will be very little of that for corporations of significant size (say, a few hundred people or more, who already have infrastructure to handle the regs), or with 95% of small businesses (which are well under the 50 person mark). But what you will have, I believe, is a weird blip in the curve between about 40 and 100 people in a company. For those firms, the reg requirements and paperwork, as well as in some cases pure cost, will be difficult. That means some companies under 50 may aim to stay under 50 if at all possible, unless they are ready to make a big burst. And companies 50+ and less than a couple hundred will have huge burdens that may effect how many people they can employ. The result of this is two-fold. First is the actual job losses (or more accurately, lack of jobs created), which hits in the short term. But in the long term, you are creating an artificial horizon, which essentially becomes a barrier to growth. Most large companies started very small, and at some point transited through the 50-100 people level. What will equivalent companies do now, when they approach that line? Some may decide to go on as normal. Others may hesitate. I doubt it will be 100% of either. But that sticky number becomes an impediment to growth. This is not to say that makes ObamaCare totally invalid or all bad - it is just a subtle point I haven't seen discussed much, but which I think may cause issues down the road. We'll have to see if the good parts of the law outweigh the bad. My uncle owns a company and he was right around 50 employees and let a couple go. My mom also works part time at a university and the university sent out a letter a couple weeks ago saying that they will essentially be cutting the allowable working hours of all part time employees (by as much as 50%) because of this as well. Anecdotal, but two vastly different businesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 Amazon just announced they are hiring 70,000 full time employees in the US. It will affect some areas and have little or no longer term affect in others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 My friend paid $75.00 a month for healthcare same policy under Obamacare is $184.00 a month. She is single and her out of pocket pocket cost will go up 4000%. This is not what I call affordable healthcare. Obama lied his ass off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:16 AM) My friend paid $75.00 a month for healthcare same policy under Obamacare is $184.00 a month. She is single and her out of pocket pocket cost will go up 4000%. This is not what I call affordable healthcare. Obama lied his ass off. Where was she getting major medical insurance for $75? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Amazon just announced they are hiring 70,000 full time employees in the US. It will affect some areas and have little or no longer term affect in others. They're hiring a ton down here, but they're all seasonal. They hire a s***load of temps every year for the Christmas season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:16 AM) My friend paid $75.00 a month for healthcare same policy under Obamacare is $184.00 a month. She is single and her out of pocket pocket cost will go up 4000%. This is not what I call affordable healthcare. Obama lied his ass off. $75->$184 is not 4000%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:33 AM) $75->$184 is not 4000%? Out of pocket is different than monthly fee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Out-of-pocket costs wouldn't change if it was the same plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illinilaw08 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:38 AM) Out-of-pocket costs wouldn't change if it was the same plan? I think premiums are going to rise for a lot of younger people who (1) aren't offered insurance through an employer; (2) don't qualify for a subsidy; and (3) get by on what essentially amounts to a catastrophe plan right now. Those specific plans likely don't cover what is required to be covered by the ACA, and the rates will necessarily tick up because of the addition of those with pre-existing conditions to the exchanges. On the other hand, premiums should come down for a lot of people who either qualify for subsidies or who have pre-existing conditions. I'm rooting for the ACA to succeed (mostly because I'm not sure there will ever be another time where there is the political will to change healthcare in this country for the better), but there will definitely be people who are adversely effected financially by this bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I understand that, but soxfest said for the same policy, premiums rose over 100% and out-of-pocket costs rose 4000%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:16 AM) My friend paid $75.00 a month for healthcare same policy under Obamacare is $184.00 a month. She is single and her out of pocket pocket cost will go up 4000%. This is not what I call affordable healthcare. Obama lied his ass off. There will be lots of examples in both directions, but... seriously, where is anyone getting individual insurance of any kind for $75 a month? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonWeltall Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) There will be lots of examples in both directions, but... seriously, where is anyone getting individual insurance of any kind for $75 a month? I'm paying $90 for Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC individual insurance and I have a mid-level plan (Advantage B). If I went down to Advantage C, I bet I could hit $75/month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I looked into buying an individual plan after college and it was going to be like $125-$135 with BCBS of Illinois. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Tex @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:21 AM) Where was she getting major medical insurance for $75? Blue Cross for her has been $75.00 a month for the last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 09:38 AM) Out-of-pocket costs wouldn't change if it was the same plan? Her deductible and out of pocket went up 4000% for same coverage under Obamacare. Edited October 2, 2013 by Soxfest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 11:40 AM) Her deductible and out of pocket went up 4000% for same coverage under Obamacare. Deductibles don't count. That's how a s*** sandwich tastes like a reuben. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2HH Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 12:03 PM) Deductibles don't count. That's how a s*** sandwich tastes like a reuben. They sure as hell count if you ever actually need to use your insurance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 QUOTE (Y2HH @ Oct 2, 2013 -> 12:46 PM) They sure as hell count if you ever actually need to use your insurance. Agreed. More of a comment that should have probably been green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I remember someone saying earlier that there was no shortage of doctors. http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/02/health/obama...harebar_twitter First 2 paragraphs: Lexington, Kentucky (CNN) -- Obamacare is expected to increase patient demand for medical services. Combine that with a worsening shortage of doctors, and next year you may have to wait a little longer to get a doctor's appointment. And the crowded emergency room may become even more so. There are approximately 48 million uninsured people in the United States. When the mandatory insurance rules of Obamacare kick in next year, and a couple dozen states expand who is eligible for Medicaid, you can bet more people are going to want to use their health benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 So is the answer that we should instead work to ensure that these millions of Americans can't access our health care system (i.e. wait time=∞) so that the wait time for those of us with access doesn't increase? Or? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts