Jump to content

White Sox sign Will Ohman to 2 year deal worth $4mil


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:41 PM)
What does the bullpen look like with healthy Peavy?

Sale, Santos, Thornton, Crain, Ohman, Pena, and probably Infante.

 

Look, I'm not a huge fan of multi year deals for relievers but this is anything but crippling and people have NO right to be angry about anything this offseason to be perfectly honest. Minus the Phillies and Red Sox I'll put our roster up against anyones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:45 PM)
Sale, Santos, Thornton, Crain, Ohman, Pena, and probably Infante.

 

Look, I'm not a huge fan of multi year deals for relievers but this is anything but crippling and people have NO right to be angry about anything this offseason to be perfectly honest. Minus the Phillies and Red Sox I'll put our roster up against anyones.

Even if he winds up struggling for 1 of these 2 years, it's not a huge writeoff/loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't go nuts over two years and 4 million. But my stance on relievers remains the same. And I'm one that doesn't believe this team is any better outside the massive upgrade in Dunn. If Beckham and CQ don't bounce back and PK regresses along with not having Peavy for possibly half the season we could once again fall short to the Twins or even the Tigers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:05 PM)
I won't go nuts over two years and 4 million. But my stance on relievers remains the same. And I'm one that doesn't believe this team is any better outside the massive upgrade in Dunn. If Beckham and CQ don't bounce back and PK regresses along with not having Peavy for possibly half the season we could once again fall short to the Twins or even the Tigers.

 

Well yeah...Not having arguably your most talented pitcher and having two of your better offensive players totally flunk will definitely put us in a bad position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 02:07 PM)
Well yeah...Not having arguably your most talented pitcher and having two of your better offensive players totally flunk will definitely put us in a bad position.

I'm still amazed at how well this team performed last year given the fact that they willingly went into the season with such blatant roster holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:07 PM)
Well yeah...Not having arguably your most talented pitcher and having two of your better offensive players totally flunk will definitely put us in a bad position.

 

Sounds obvious. But it seems like many around here think this team is 10 wins better or something. They're still a lot of question marks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:05 PM)
I won't go nuts over two years and 4 million. But my stance on relievers remains the same. And I'm one that doesn't believe this team is any better outside the massive upgrade in Dunn. If Beckham and CQ don't bounce back and PK regresses along with not having Peavy for possibly half the season we could once again fall short to the Twins or even the Tigers.

I understand your stance and the risk behind signing relievers to multi-year deals, but how else were we going to improve our bullpen for 2011? Free agency was our only option and that meant offering multi-year deals. There's obviously a huge risk that Crain and/or Ohman sucks in one of their years with us, but would you rather throw out two unproven minor leaguers without great track records in 2011 to avoid that risk? Given our situation, I'll worry about 2012 and 2013 later. It would have been utterly stupid to go into the season with obvious holes in the bullpen, given the potential of our offense and rotation, because we were worried Crain and Ohman MIGHT be bad in future years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 02:14 PM)
Sounds obvious. But it seems like many around here think this team is 10 wins better or something. They're still a lot of question marks.

This team could EASILY be 10 wins better. Adam Dunn instead of Kotsay...3.5 ish wins. Remove Mark Teahen and replace him with an average player would be 1.5 wins (since he was worthless)...replacing him with an above average defender would be more than that. Getting rid of Randy Williams and replacing him with Ohman is half a win. Replacing Jenks could be worth >1 win. Then Pierzynski, Quentin, and Beckham all had very much down years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:15 PM)
I understand your stance and the risk behind signing relievers to multi-year deals, but how else were we going to improve our bullpen for 2011? Free agency was our only option and that meant offering multi-year deals. There's obviously a huge risk that Crain and/or Ohman sucks in one of their years with us, but would you rather throw out two unproven minor leaguers without great track records in 2011 to avoid that risk? Given our situation, I'll worry about 2012 and 2013 later. It would have been utterly stupid to go into the season with obvious holes in the bullpen, given the potential of our offense and rotation, because we were worried Crain and Ohman MIGHT be bad in future years.

 

Well when I see a team like the Braves spit out Johnny Venters and Craig Kimbrel in one season or the Padres seemingly piecing together a solid bullpen every year without having to overpay in years and money in free agency, yes, it would be nice if the system could produce a competent arm every now and then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:14 PM)
Sounds obvious. But it seems like many around here think this team is 10 wins better or something. They're still a lot of question marks.

 

FWIW, I combined the projections out there right now and they have the Sox at 93 wins. That's with pretty moderate projections on Beckham and Quentin and Peavy making 23 starts.

Edited by chw42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:20 PM)
This team could EASILY be 10 wins better. Adam Dunn instead of Kotsay...3.5 ish wins. Remove Mark Teahen and replace him with an average player would be 1.5 wins (since he was worthless)...replacing him with an above average defender would be more than that. Getting rid of Randy Williams and replacing him with Ohman is half a win. Replacing Jenks could be worth >1 win. Then Pierzynski, Quentin, and Beckham all had very much down years.

 

And there's certainly no guarantee that they bounce back. And PK will most certainly regress. And I'm really worried about Sale and the pressure that's going to be on him since Peavy had to act like a tough guy and pitch when he clearly shouldn't have been.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 02:23 PM)
Well when I see a team like the Braves spit out Johnny Venters and Craig Kimbrel in one season or the Padres seemingly piecing together a solid bullpen every year without having to overpay in years and money in free agency, yes, it would be nice if the system could produce a competent arm every now and then.

The system is regularly producing competent arms! Santos! Infante! Carter within a year! And that same organization you're praising has a number of retreads from other teams in its bullpen. Scott Linebrink, George Sherrill, Scott Proctor. Peter Moylan, their closer, they signed as a free agent 25 year old following his showing for an international team in the 2006 World Baseball classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 02:26 PM)
And there's certainly no guarantee that they bounce back. And PK will most certainly regress. And I'm really worried about Sale and the pressure that's going to be on him since Peavy had to act like a tough guy and pitch when he clearly shouldn't have been.

There's no guarantee for anything man, this is baseball. I can give plausible reasons why the Phillies will struggle next year.

 

The Sox are in the best possible place they can be. I'm thrilled about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:27 PM)
The system is regularly producing competent arms! Santos! Infante! Carter within a year! And that same organization you're praising has a number of retreads from other teams in its bullpen. Scott Linebrink, George Sherrill, Scott Proctor. Peter Moylan, their closer, they signed as a free agent 25 year old following his showing for an international team in the 2006 World Baseball classic.

 

Santos isn't a product of the Sox system. We lucked into him. And his peripherals scream regression. I have no idea why you threw Carter and Infante at me. They've proven next to nothing. And even Carter's minor league numbers were mediocre. Thing is I was more than willing to give both a shot at the expense of handing out 2-3 year deals to relievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 8, 2011 -> 01:28 PM)
There's no guarantee for anything man, this is baseball. I can give plausible reasons why the Phillies will struggle next year.

 

The Sox are in the best possible place they can be. I'm thrilled about that.

 

I know that. But I think some are overrating our offseason. Dunn without question makes us better. Everything else is a toss-up right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...