southsider2k5 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/01/heym...medium=facebook •The Red Sox talked to the A's and White Sox about Jonathan Papelbon. Boston appeared willing to offer Rafael Soriano a one-year deal and make him their closer. If the sides had agreed to a deal, the Red Sox would have sent Papelbon elsewhere, likely to Oakland or Chicago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrlesque Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 02:09 PM) http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/01/heym...medium=facebook Papelbon at $12 million? Ugh, thankfully that didn't happen. (Unless the Red Sox were going to pay a sizable portion of that contract, but if that were the case, why wouldn't they just non-tender him in the first place?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 No thanks. Big contract, big douchebag. I'll pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 (edited) Sureeeeeee. And why the f*** would the A's be a possible destination when they already have a premier closer in Andrew Bailey, who's dirt cheap and not eligible for FA until 2015? Edited January 21, 2011 by Jordan4life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 03:29 PM) Sureeeeeee. And why the f*** would the A's be a possible destination when they already have a premier closer in Andrew Bailey, who's dirt cheap and not eligible for FA until 2015? Wonder if they'd have gambled on trying him as a starter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 02:30 PM) Wonder if they'd have gambled on trying him as a starter? Doubt it. The A's are not exactly lacking in the SP department. Just more B.S. from that pathetic site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
striker Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 This would have made sense if we were sending Teahen back in the trade. Then we are only adding $7m to the books and actually saving money in the long run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 03:37 PM) Doubt it. The A's are not exactly lacking in the SP department. Just more B.S. from that pathetic site. That site sucks worse than any prospect to ever enter the Sox farm system! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Daddy Kool Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Not as long as Mike Florio's ProFootballtalk.com is around. QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 04:27 PM) That site sucks worse than any prospect to ever enter the Sox farm system! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Paplebon melted as many times as Bobbie Jenks did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenksycat Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 02:37 PM) Doubt it. The A's are not exactly lacking in the SP department. Just more B.S. from that pathetic site. You realize that site doesn't write any material right? It just compiles it all into one place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.J. Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 02:37 PM) Doubt it. The A's are not exactly lacking in the SP department. Just more B.S. from that pathetic site. The info actually came from Jon Heyman of SI.com. Don't get the MLBTR bashing. It was garbage a long while back, but since making some changes a few years ago has been one of the most valuable resources on the web for compiling and analyzing anything related to roster moves in a fast and comprehensive manner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 QUOTE (R.J. @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 06:54 PM) The info actually came from Jon Heyman of SI.com. Don't get the MLBTR bashing. It was garbage a long while back, but since making some changes a few years ago has been one of the most valuable resources on the web for compiling and analyzing anything related to roster moves in a fast and comprehensive manner. I was kidding, I love MLBTR. It's my 7th most visited site ever according to Chrome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R.J. Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 08:17 PM) I was kidding, I love MLBTR. It's my 7th most visited site ever according to Chrome. I've made a huge mistake! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeynach Posted January 23, 2011 Share Posted January 23, 2011 QUOTE (R.J. @ Jan 21, 2011 -> 05:54 PM) The info actually came from Jon Heyman of SI.com. Don't get the MLBTR bashing. It was garbage a long while back, but since making some changes a few years ago has been one of the most valuable resources on the web for compiling and analyzing anything related to roster moves in a fast and comprehensive manner. I work for those guys so easy on the bashing. And hes right most if not all of our material comes from 3rd party media sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.