Brian Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 They needed to sign someone that makes Sabathia look thin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 I read a funny as hell tweet about him holding the record for most pinstripes on a Yanks jersey. I don't wish him harm, really- but I hope like hell he cracks their rotation out of spring training, so I guess I'm kind of wishing him (and the Yanks) harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeFabregas Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 It's impossible for me not to like Bartolo Colon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxfan09 Posted January 27, 2011 Author Share Posted January 27, 2011 Again, what is the big deal? Hell if anything this is easier for you to ignore because all of the relevant information is located in the topic title and description. Instead it turns into a chance for you to lob some more cheap shots at people for no particular reason, over nothing. Why the attitude when anyone dares question you anymore? If you want to be edgy and bitter, you really should expect it. That's the way Soxtalk has always been. SS2K5, I don't mind getting policed if the thread requires that, really no biggie. I learned my lesson a while back about becoming too negative in this place so it is cool. As a matter of fact I always ask for threads to be merged, renamed, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 If only the Yankees had signed Bobby instead of the Sawks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 Wow, a lot of outrage over a pretty stupid thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 26, 2011 -> 06:17 PM) Eh, I don't see why you would waste your time on thread policing what exactly has to go into the MLB thread. Talk about a waste of time. Why was the separate MLB subforum dumped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 08:11 AM) Why was the separate MLB subforum dumped? Gage dumped it to keep more talk on the main board in the off-season when nothing was going on. It will be back for the regular season, as I understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 26, 2011 -> 05:45 PM) It really doesn't. But if you say so. I'll make sure to keep tabs on all Yankee minor league pitching transactions from now on so I can immediately start a thread when a signing occurs. God you've been annoying this off-season. What the hell's been up your ass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 09:12 AM) God you've been annoying this off-season. What the hell's been up your ass? Whatever you say. The ignore button is there for a reason. I made a simple observation. It wasn't a big deal to me. Those that responded made it a big deal. Nobody attacked the guy. I've seen quite a few threads created of late that clearly weren't thread topic worthy. People used to tease Jabroni about this all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 I'd rather have more threads about less important topics than have interesting tidbits getting lost in the catch-all threads. For example, I rarely check the catch all because there are just so many pages and there's no way to know ahead of time whether I'll be interested. I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iwritecode Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 I must be retarded or something because I can't find Colon's numbers against the Sox. I seem to remember them hitting him pretty hard when he was with the Indians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (Iwritecode @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 02:39 PM) I must be retarded or something because I can't find Colon's numbers against the Sox. I seem to remember them hitting him pretty hard when he was with the Indians. 9-6 in 19 starts, 4.15 ERA, 1.35 WHIP. Sox had a .261 average with a .739 OPS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 (edited) I wonder if Jon Heyman is going crazy over this... he said Hal Steinbrener had a top 5 off-season because he overruled Cashman on Soriano and he handled the Jeter situation well... he might make him #1 now with this signing!! http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...tars/index.html Seriously, he's #3 and there's not one comment about them completely whiffing on every major FA they went after especially Red Sox snagging Crawford... guess he needs the NYY fans to up his hit count!! Edited January 27, 2011 by SoxFan562004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny Hates Prospects Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 03:08 PM) I wonder if Jon Heyman is going crazy over this... he said Hal Steinbrener had a top 5 off-season because he overruled Cashman on Soriano and he handled the Jeter situation well... he might make him #1 now with this signing!! http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...tars/index.html Seriously, he's #3 and there's not one comment about them completely whiffing on every major FA they went after especially Red Sox snagging Crawford... guess he needs the NYY fans to up his hit count!! Wow, that is pretty bad. IMO: 1. Jays 2. Brewcrew 3. Phillies 4. White Sox 5. Red Sox (don't like the Crawford deal) 6. Cubs --- 30. Texas Rangers, for losing Cliff Lee following a franchise-defining season and then failing to seriously upgrade the starting staff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Kenny Hates Prospects @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 03:52 PM) Wow, that is pretty bad. IMO: 1. Jays 2. Brewcrew 3. Phillies 4. White Sox 5. Red Sox (don't like the Crawford deal) 6. Cubs --- 30. Texas Rangers, for losing Cliff Lee following a franchise-defining season and then failing to seriously upgrade the starting staff like your list, I would just swap Brewers and Jays, just because I am more of an immediate payoff type and the fact that the Crew knew Prince is walking and went all in this year and made Gallardo their 3rd starter was damn impressive! Not to mention I think Saito was a nice under the radar signing. Edited January 27, 2011 by SoxFan562004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenny Hates Prospects Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 03:58 PM) like your list, I would just swap Brewers and Jays, just because I am more of an immediate payoff type and the fact that the Crew knew Prince is walking and went all in this year and made Gallardo their 3rd starter was damn impressive! Not to mention I think Saito was a nice under the radar signing. I agree, the Brewers had a terrific offseason, and I'm only putting the Jays first because that Wells deal was an act of God that single-handedly saved a franchise. But that move took place in LaLa Land, and if you want to talk about real, Earth- and reality-based baseball moves, the Brewers have had the best offseason. I love every move they've made. Miller Park is going to be pretty fun this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 03:58 PM) like your list, I would just swap Brewers and Jays, just because I am more of an immediate payoff type and the fact that the Crew knew Prince is walking and went all in this year and made Gallardo their 3rd starter was damn impressive! Not to mention I think Saito was a nice under the radar signing. It's just my opinion, but Gallardo could still very well be that team's ace, at the very least their number 2.. His stuff is beyond electric. I watched all 3 starts of his starts vs the Cubs last year and I thought immediately that this guy could challenge for a CY in the very near future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 04:22 PM) It's just my opinion, but Gallardo could still very well be that team's ace, at the very least their number 2.. His stuff is beyond electric. I watched all 3 starts of his starts vs the Cubs last year and I thought immediately that this guy could challenge for a CY in the very near future. I agree 100%. I'd rank him above Greinke. He got tired at the end of last year, which skewered his numbers a bit, but he definitely has ace stuff and is only gonna turn 25 next month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 27, 2011 Share Posted January 27, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 04:22 PM) It's just my opinion, but Gallardo could still very well be that team's ace, at the very least their number 2.. His stuff is beyond electric. I watched all 3 starts of his starts vs the Cubs last year and I thought immediately that this guy could challenge for a CY in the very near future. true, he's an awesome pitcher... I should have phrased it differently, those three starters are extremely impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 28, 2011 Share Posted January 28, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 05:29 PM) true, he's an awesome pitcher... I should have phrased it differently, those three starters are extremely impressive. I know what you meant. Honestly, other than Kershaw and a healthy Strasburg [i'm so bummed we won't get to see him this year], there's not a pitcher in the NL 25 and under that I would take over Gallardo. Edited January 28, 2011 by Jordan4life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted January 28, 2011 Share Posted January 28, 2011 It's crazy to think that Gallardo is only 25. It just seems like he's been in the big leagues forever already. He's ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 28, 2011 Share Posted January 28, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 07:35 PM) I know what you meant. Honestly, other than Kershaw and a healthy Strasburg [i'm so bummed we won't get to see him this year], there's not a pitcher in the NL 25 and under that I would take over Gallardo. well, if you're in the NW burbs the Milwaukee trip is really easy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 28, 2011 Share Posted January 28, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 27, 2011 -> 08:35 PM) I know what you meant. Honestly, other than Kershaw and a healthy Strasburg [i'm so bummed we won't get to see him this year], there's not a pitcher in the NL 25 and under that I would take over Gallardo. Might as well give you a few more possibles. Madison Bumgartner, Tommy Hanson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 28, 2011 Share Posted January 28, 2011 QUOTE (SoxFan562004 @ Jan 28, 2011 -> 09:53 AM) well, if you're in the NW burbs the Milwaukee trip is really easy! I mean Strasburg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts