Jump to content

Your most underrated teams


witesoxfan

Recommended Posts

Not that you have to do any real research, but the board is bored and I figure talking about baseball is awesome.

 

Anyways, I was actually looking at Ted Kluszewski's stats the other day, and saw that he had a 1.049 OPS in 1954 and finished 2nd in the MVP voting. I was curious to see who could have actually been better than him and it turns out Willie Mays actually was better than him that year. So then I went to see who won it in the AL - Yogi Berra with a whopping .855 OPS. 4th in voting that year was Minnie Minoso, who actually led the league in bWAR, so talk about media bias if you want to, though it was a time frame when people considered a team's success more than they did the individual season.

 

Which leads to the main focus of this - spots 2, 3, 5, and 6 in the MVP race all belonged to members of the Cleveland Indians (Larry Doby, Bobby Avila, Bob Lemon, and Early Wynn respectively). I saw that and figured that team had to have put up some gaudy numbers, and jesus did they. 111 wins (in 154 games), 2nd in the league in runs scored (746), 1st in runs allowed (504). More specifically, they had 5 regulars with an OPS over .822, and of their 5 starters who threw significant innings, Art Houtteman had the worst ERA and ERA+ (3.35 and 109). Oh, and Bob Feller was still bringing it at 35 - even though he threw the fewest innings of the staff, he put up a 3.09 ERA and a 119 ERA+.

 

They were swept in the World Series by the Giants, who "only" won 97.

 

Damn, that Indians team was ridiculous.

 

Oh, and parity in the AL? Not happening. Indians won 111, Yankees finished 2nd at 103, Chicago finished 3rd with 94 wins, and Boston finished 4th with 69 wins. Yes, that is a 35 win differential between 3rd and 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Mar 8, 2011 -> 02:10 AM)
Oh, and parity in the AL? Not happening. Indians won 111, Yankees finished 2nd at 103, Chicago finished 3rd with 94 wins, and Boston finished 4th with 69 wins. Yes, that is a 35 win differential between 3rd and 4th.

 

Remember there were only 8 teams in the league then. It stands to reason that with 3 teams with those ridiculous win totals, the other 5 had to have lots o' losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...