ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 06:21 PM) I find this interesting: Lillibridge career minor league slash stats: .268/.348/.409/.758 Milledge career major league slash stats: .269/.328/.394/.723 Since 2008 (when Lillibridge entered the majors) Milledge = 1.4 WAR Lillibridge = -1.5 WAR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 06:21 PM) I find this interesting: Lillibridge career minor league slash stats: .268/.348/.409/.758 Milledge career major league slash stats: .269/.328/.394/.723 Interesting, but irrelevent, especially consideing Milledge did most of his minor league work as an under 24 year old, is younger than Lillibridge and Brent has spent the last 4 seasons basically in AAA. Edited March 13, 2011 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (knightni @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 06:24 PM) I meant... when he first started getting playing time. He got the majority of his playing time when Beckham got hurt and had a .437 OPS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 06:50 PM) Interesting, but irrelavent, especially consideing Milledge did most of his minor league work as an under 24 year old, is younger than Lillibridge and Brent has spent the last 4 seasons basically in AAA. Those are Milledge's major league numbers, his minor league numbers blow Lillibridge's out of the water. For as much of a f***up as Milledge has been during his major league career the numbers he put up are still comparable to what Lillibridge was doing at much lower levels of competition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 08:21 PM) I find this interesting: Lillibridge career minor league slash stats: .268/.348/.409/.758 Milledge career major league slash stats: .269/.328/.394/.723 Milledge's minor league slash .301 .379 .470 .849 Milledge has a ton of potential over Lillibridge, and given what we already have and need, he is a much better fit. Lillibridge is just a terrible ballplayer, and should not be on a 25 man roster of a team that is trying to contend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 06:56 PM) Milledge's minor league slash .301 .379 .470 .849 Milledge has a ton of potential over Lillibridge, and given what we already have and need, he is a much better fit. Lillibridge is just a terrible ballplayer, and should not be on a 25 man roster of a team that is trying to contend. It's funny because I've just kind of counted Lillibridge out all along since he's, you know, terrible. I had no idea anyone was hoping he'd make the roster out of spring training. What versatility he does possess is redundant on this ballclub, he's probably slower than the other 2 he's competing against, I know for a fact he's slower than De Aza, he's the oldest of the 3 (19 months older than Milledge, 1 year older than De Aza) and he's the weakest hitter of the bunch since he's pretty much a disgrace at the plate. I just assumed he'd be dumped near the end of camp, likely via trade for next to nothing and either De Aza or Milledge would be carried. I thought De Aza may have a slight advantage since he can't be sent to the minors without first clearing waivers and Milledge can though Lastings has at least proven that he can hit a little at the major league level, something De Aza hasn't had a chance to prove really thanks in part to the devastating ankle injury he suffered in '07. And then there's Milledge's potential. I'm still thinking De Aza or Milledge and I'm not sure I REALLY care which of the 2 is chosen though I'd probably lean toward Milledge. This is also assuming Milledge has no out clause in his contract, something I haven't seen reported anywhere. They're generally given to vets, though Milledge's production last season really should have landed him with a major league gig for 2011 so it'd be odd to see him start the season in the minors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 Lastings impressed the hell out of me this week. Count me amongst those who would like to see him make the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 08:07 PM) It's funny because I've just kind of counted Lillibridge out all along since he's, you know, terrible. I had no idea anyone was hoping he'd make the roster out of spring training. What versatility he does possess is redundant on this ballclub, he's probably slower than the other 2 he's competing against, I know for a fact he's slower than De Aza, he's the oldest of the 3 (19 months older than Milledge, 1 year older than De Aza) and he's the weakest hitter of the bunch since he's pretty much a disgrace at the plate. I just assumed he'd be dumped near the end of camp, likely via trade for next to nothing and either De Aza or Milledge would be carried. I thought De Aza may have a slight advantage since he can't be sent to the minors without first clearing waivers and Milledge can though Lastings has at least proven that he can hit a little at the major league level, something De Aza hasn't had a chance to prove really thanks in part to the devastating ankle injury he suffered in '07. And then there's Milledge's potential. I'm still thinking De Aza or Milledge and I'm not sure I REALLY care which of the 2 is chosen though I'd probably lean toward Milledge. This is also assuming Milledge has no out clause in his contract, something I haven't seen reported anywhere. They're generally given to vets, though Milledge's production last season really should have landed him with a major league gig for 2011 so it'd be odd to see him start the season in the minors. Couldn't say it better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 I understand that Millhouse is supposed to be better than Bridge, but this is all in-theory talk. I'd love for Millions to realize all that potential but I'm not sold on him hitting any grooves off our bench. I hated Bridge more than anything until he came in for Beckham. I'm still amazed by some of those balls he hit that first week. Been a fan ever since and I like him on our bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 You're going to allow 20 ABs effect your whole image of a baseball player, great. Lillibridge is about as bad as you will see in the bigs when it comes to hitting, and his fielding his nothing special either. So why are people so enthralled by him? Milledge has atleast shown that he can hit in the majors, and has the potential to be a starter, Lillibridge shouldn't even make an MLB team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 Here's how I see it: last season Milledge hit .277/.332/.380/.712 over 412 PA. Can you even imagine Lillibridge putting up those kinds of numbers of the same amount of PA? I doubt you can. The last time Milledge got that many PA he put up a line of .268/.330/.402/.731 over 587 PA at age 23, once again mediocre for a prospect of Lastings' caliber but still better production than you can possibly imagine from Lillibridge. Milledge has proven that he can hit a little bit at the major league level and plays all the positions that the Sox require out of that last man on the bench, they have plenty of personnel that can cover the infield position, what they need is someone to cover the outfield, hit a little and run little. We KNOW Milledge can do this, with Lillibridge it's somehow a stretch even though the expectations are low. Then you factor in age and potential and it becomes a landslide in my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 CSNChi_Beatnik Brett Ballantini Milledge just told me #WhiteSox have made such an impression on him, he'll def remain w/team whether or not he sticks right out of camp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 12:41 AM) He likes us! He REALLY likes us! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 01:02 AM) He likes us! He REALLY likes us! That being said, I've always appreciated how the Sox do business. They reward loyalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Heads22 @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 02:25 AM) That being said, I've always appreciated how the Sox do business. They reward loyalty. Reinsdorf is an unloyal owner. Just ask D-Wade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatScott82 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 Pierre has taken Milledge under his wing. Pierre is a great club house presence and does a great job for players that at one time were 'lost' or looking to find there way on a new team. I have a feeling Rios success in 2010 had a lot to do with Pierre. He keeps guys loose and comfortable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 12:47 AM) I understand that Millhouse is supposed to be better than Bridge, but this is all in-theory talk. I'd love for Millions to realize all that potential but I'm not sold on him hitting any grooves off our bench. I hated Bridge more than anything until he came in for Beckham. I'm still amazed by some of those balls he hit that first week. Been a fan ever since and I like him on our bench. To be someone who was impressed with a guy who had 22 hits the entire season and was 11 for his last 70 with 29 ks, its not all-theory talk you will be impressed with Lastings Milledge at the plate. In fact, you'll probably be impressed with Teahen's glove at 3B. He can string 3 or 4 good games together. Edited March 13, 2011 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 01:41 AM) OMG BUT OZZ AND KENNY WILL DRIVE PLAYERS OFF! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 I like the track record the Sox have when it comes to taking the "do not wants" of other organizations and making it work. (Manny even hit a home run!) I don't like the track record the Sox have when it comes to taking players who have spent more than 4 hours in their minor league system and making it work. But really, I want to see Milledge with the team. I hope Ozzie doesn't have some irrational Kotsay-esque reasoning about why Lillibridge is more valuable to the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 Have the people who were impressed with Lillibridge last season even looked at his minor league numbers? Last year in AAA he put up a .708 OPS in a pretty damn good hitters park. It was his third season in AAA and his overall best year since 2007. I don't care what he did at the major league level for a couple of months, the guy is not and will never be a good offensive player. This is like the Donny Lucy stuff all over again. Every once in a while a garbage player can get lucky in the majors for a period of time. That doesn't make him a good player. Now, Lillibridge may not be a pure garbage player. He's versatile and fast which can be great for a bench, but he doesn't play any of his positions at an elite level. He's a great 26th man if he's down in AAA backing up our backups, but due to his lack of options, that's probably not a possibility anymore. If you can get him through waivers and have him in AAA in the event of an injury then great. But there's absolutely no reason to put him on the major league roster if we're going with a four man bench and already have two infielders. We need a legit fourth outfielder and Millidge is the best guy for that job IMO. Plus he can mash lefties (another need on our bench) and still has the potential to become an everyday player. He's the better option for 2011 and he's the better option in 2012 and beyond when Pierre and Quentin could be gone. I don't see how anyone could honestly prefer Lillibridge over him. I think people are being blinded by a couple of lucky months from Lillibridge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 10:01 AM) Have the people who were impressed with Lillibridge last season even looked at his minor league numbers? Last year in AAA he put up a .708 OPS in a pretty damn good hitters park. It was his third season in AAA and his overall best year since 2007. I don't care what he did at the major league level for a couple of months, the guy is not and will never be a good offensive player. This is like the Donny Lucy stuff all over again. Every once in a while a garbage player can get lucky in the majors for a period of time. That doesn't make him a good player. Now, Lillibridge may not be a pure garbage player. He's versatile and fast which can be great for a bench, but he doesn't play any of his positions at an elite level. He's a great 26th man if he's down in AAA backing up our backups, but due to his lack of options, that's probably not a possibility anymore. If you can get him through waivers and have him in AAA in the event of an injury then great. But there's absolutely no reason to put him on the major league roster if we're going with a four man bench and already have two infielders. We need a legit fourth outfielder and Millidge is the best guy for that job IMO. Plus he can mash lefties (another need on our bench) and still has the potential to become an everyday player. He's the better option for 2011 and he's the better option in 2012 and beyond when Pierre and Quentin could be gone. I don't see how anyone could honestly prefer Lillibridge over him. I think people are being blinded by a couple of lucky months from Lillibridge. I don't see that being a problem. And yes, Milledge is an absolute perfect fit for this team. It isn't just what he brings to the table (which is more than Lillibridge and is suited better to our needs), but he also compliments Teahen very well with the way each hits well against pitchers from opposite sides of the mound. People want Lillibridge because they have seen him before and believe he's a known commodity. I notice a lot of these people are the same ones who wanted to keep Crede around long after his usefulness went away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 12:06 PM) People want Lillibridge because they have seen him before and believe he's a known commodity. I don't want to think thats why people want him around, though when I try to think of any other reason, I'm stumped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Zelig Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 01:06 PM) I don't see that being a problem. And yes, Milledge is an absolute perfect fit for this team. It isn't just what he brings to the table (which is more than Lillibridge and is suited better to our needs), but he also compliments Teahen very well with the way each hits well against pitchers from opposite sides of the mound. People want Lillibridge because they have seen him before and believe he's a known commodity. I notice a lot of these people are the same ones who wanted to keep Crede around long after his usefulness went away. I have only seen one person say they want Lillibridge on the team. Others have said they think he'll make the team, but that's different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottyDo Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Mar 13, 2011 -> 04:08 PM) I have only seen one person say they want Lillibridge on the team. Others have said they think he'll make the team, but that's different. I want Lillibridge because I stopped having DirecTV in mid-August Seriously, though, the only thing he brings to the table is the ability to play multiple positions adequately and a single flash of decent hitting. I've had my eye on Milledge for years now, and I'd like to see if he can actualize his potential. He's so damn TOOLSY! Which I think is the opposite of grindy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 12, 2011 -> 08:07 PM) It's funny because I've just kind of counted Lillibridge out all along since he's, you know, terrible. I had no idea anyone was hoping he'd make the roster out of spring training. What versatility he does possess is redundant on this ballclub, he's probably slower than the other 2 he's competing against, I know for a fact he's slower than De Aza, he's the oldest of the 3 (19 months older than Milledge, 1 year older than De Aza) and he's the weakest hitter of the bunch since he's pretty much a disgrace at the plate. I just assumed he'd be dumped near the end of camp, likely via trade for next to nothing and either De Aza or Milledge would be carried. I thought De Aza may have a slight advantage since he can't be sent to the minors without first clearing waivers and Milledge can though Lastings has at least proven that he can hit a little at the major league level, something De Aza hasn't had a chance to prove really thanks in part to the devastating ankle injury he suffered in '07. And then there's Milledge's potential. I'm still thinking De Aza or Milledge and I'm not sure I REALLY care which of the 2 is chosen though I'd probably lean toward Milledge. This is also assuming Milledge has no out clause in his contract, something I haven't seen reported anywhere. They're generally given to vets, though Milledge's production last season really should have landed him with a major league gig for 2011 so it'd be odd to see him start the season in the minors. couldnt agree more, milledge, deaza>>>>lilli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.