Jump to content

K-Dubya vs. Soxtalk


Texsox

  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. On trades and roster moves, have you been right more of less than Kenny Williams?

    • I've been right more times
      13
    • I've been right less times
      6
    • About the same
      11
    • Wait, you are making a point . . .
      7


Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Tex @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:03 PM)
I know it is unscientific, but at more than half of the people that responded have done the same or better than Williams at trades. What does that tell you? I'll bet that way more than half would agree they can manage better than Ozzie. No wonder the team is doing so poorly. Hell, they wouldn't even be good posters here.

It doesn't tell me anything. I remember people b****ing about the Danks/McCarthy trade and wanting to crucify KW. I'm sure the people from that thread are still holding to their belief that it was an awful trade. Oh wait.

 

It's easy to play arm chair GM and have revisionist history at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:09 PM)
It doesn't tell me anything. I remember people b****ing about the Danks/McCarthy trade and wanting to crucify KW. I'm sure the people from that thread are still holding to their belief that it was an awful trade. Oh wait.

 

It's easy to play arm chair GM and have revisionist history at the same time.

Apparently it's also pretty easy to blindly follow Sox mgmt, and never question anything they do as they continue to fail to produce a consistent winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:09 PM)
It doesn't tell me anything. I remember people b****ing about the Danks/McCarthy trade and wanting to crucify KW. I'm sure the people from that thread are still holding to their belief that it was an awful trade. Oh wait.

 

It's easy to play arm chair GM and have revisionist history at the same time.

Juan Pierre has a .316 OBP and is our leadoff hitter. He is also 6/14 on stolen bases. I think most smart GMs/managers would realize that dude is not a leadoff hitter anymore.

 

Baseball is perhaps the one game where statistics can tell you so much more about the game than watching. Runs scored is predicated on on-base percentage not batting average. And steals are pretty much a horrible idea unless the runner is successful about 80% of the time. These are proven statistic statements yet our management did not get the memo. It is stuff like this that irks me so much about KW and Ozzie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bigruss22 @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:05 PM)
I hate these types of statements, jabs, or whatever you want to call this crap.

 

It's called stating the obvious, year in and year out posters here have outperformed Williams. There was some great stats earlier in the thread, with all that salary, there should be a string of playoff appearances, yet there isn't. His roster moves have been so obviously bad, more posters than not, could have done better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tex @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:20 PM)
It's called stating the obvious, year in and year out posters here have outperformed Williams. There was some great stats earlier in the thread, with all that salary, there should be a string of playoff appearances, yet there isn't. His roster moves have been so obviously bad, more posters than not, could have done better.

Again I am not saying I could do better, but I am saying there are lots of other highly qualified baseball minds that could with the inherent advantages the White Sox have over others in our division. Is that concept really so hard to see?

 

It's like telling me that I cannot criticize Keith Bogans for his play as the Bulls starting 2-guard because I, myself, could not go out there and outperform him. Yet anyone can ostensibly see that he is not a good 2-guard.

Edited by maggsmaggs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tex @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:20 PM)
It's called stating the obvious, year in and year out posters here have outperformed Williams. There was some great stats earlier in the thread, with all that salary, there should be a string of playoff appearances, yet there isn't. His roster moves have been so obviously bad, more posters than not, could have done better.

I have no idea whether you are being serious or mocking posters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:22 PM)
Again I am not saying I could do better, but I am saying there are lots of other highly qualified baseball minds that could with the inherent advantages the White Sox have over others in our division. Is that concept really so hard to see?

 

It's like telling me that I cannot criticize Keith Bogans for his play as the Bulls starting 2-guard because I, myself, could not go out there and outperform him. Yet anyone can ostensibly see that he is not a good 2-guard.

 

With the Sox payroll advantage in the division, it shouldn't even take a highly qualified baseball mind. I'm with you, I can't believe anyone here can't see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I say that someone should be responsible for the team's underperformance for most of the past ten years it is mocking? I believe this thread conforms what I've been thinking, Williams, not Ozzie or Walker should be the one to go.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tex @ May 15, 2011 -> 04:53 PM)
If I say that someone should be responsible for the team's underperformance for most of the past ten years it is mocking? I believe this thread conforms what I've been thinking, Williams, not Ozzie or Walker should be the one to go.

Tex, you tend to have many mocking posts of people on this site, so when you actually make a claim like this people are going to assume you are once again mocking them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing I can do about that. If I posted Williams was doing a good job people would think I was mocking, if I post he's doing a terrible job, people will think I am mocking. I believe the first blame goes to the players, but Williams deserves to be taking a lot more heat than it seems he is. I had not added it up until now, but I know we've had people here that have called trades mistakes right away, and applauded some as well. I was wondering how many have consistently beat him at this, and this proved it to me.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:09 PM)
It doesn't tell me anything. I remember people b****ing about the Danks/McCarthy trade and wanting to crucify KW. I'm sure the people from that thread are still holding to their belief that it was an awful trade. Oh wait.

 

It's easy to play arm chair GM and have revisionist history at the same time.

 

I don't recall there being too much complaining about the Danks/McCarthy deal. Perhaps you're the one revising history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll also add that with the 2007 that the Sox had, and the fact that D1 got shut down early and Masset was part of the pen disaster, there were a lot of people complaining about the guys we got back. At least that we should have gotten something better back than just those scrubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I'm not suggesting he sucks or is the worse GM in baseball. I think he's about average.

 

Plus, we don't know what trades he's been offered and passed on. Perhaps that could add to or subtract from his job performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ May 15, 2011 -> 05:22 PM)
I don't recall there being too much complaining about the Danks/McCarthy deal. Perhaps you're the one revising history.

A lot of people complained.

 

As they did with the Garcia deal.

 

Point is, people tend to forget the great deals and remember the ones that didn't quite work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ May 15, 2011 -> 03:16 PM)
Juan Pierre has a .316 OBP and is our leadoff hitter. He is also 6/14 on stolen bases. I think most smart GMs/managers would realize that dude is not a leadoff hitter anymore.

 

Baseball is perhaps the one game where statistics can tell you so much more about the game than watching. Runs scored is predicated on on-base percentage not batting average. And steals are pretty much a horrible idea unless the runner is successful about 80% of the time. These are proven statistic statements yet our management did not get the memo. It is stuff like this that irks me so much about KW and Ozzie.

I hated this deal when it was made, and I believe I took s*** for it here. Speedy, slappy guys are the worst kind of players. Further, playing the bunting/stolen bases NL smallball bullcrap is awful too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ May 15, 2011 -> 05:22 PM)
I don't recall there being too much complaining about the Danks/McCarthy deal. Perhaps you're the one revising history.

I'm way to lazy to look up threads, but I remember my whole argument being the organization knows that player best (McCarthy) and they're selling him high. People were drinking the McCarthy kool-aid like it was free beer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...