RockRaines Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 12:56 PM) Are you serious? yup. I think he's overrated, overpaid and declining. He gives up goals by the bunches. I detest Seabrook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Montador is still due 2.75 mil a year til 2015. If he can come back healthy and not suck at hockey, that would be huge. It would make it easier to deal with a trade of #2 or #7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 Niklas Hjalmarsson could be traded. Maybe Stalberg. I don't see guys like Keith, Seabrook or Kane getting traded. Unless you are planing on completely rebuilding. Why you would trade those 3 guys is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (SoxAce @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 09:31 AM) Hawks can't get a RFA this summer due to not enough draft picks. (from the Oduya deal) Schneider would be amazing, but Hawks have to go to the UFA route. Perhaps a guy like Montoya if they trade Crawford. I thought the Oduya picks were next year and not 2012. QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 12:52 PM) I'd drive Seabrook to the f***ing airport myself if they could unload him. Whoa, can't disagree more. He was our best defenseman by a mile this year. I'd say the 3 names who are most in danger of being traded are Sharp, Hjalmarsson and Stalberg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 01:20 PM) I'd say the 3 names who are most in danger of being traded are Sharp, Hjalmarsson and Stalberg. I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (CanOfCorn @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 01:59 PM) I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw? It would be tough to trade Kane. You'd have to get a top 5 goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (CanOfCorn @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 01:59 PM) I would agree on those three. Possibly Kane, but I think Stan would have to be blown out of the water for that to happen. And Rock, I can't believe you think Seabrook is that bad. He was the most consistent d-man this year. Was there anything specific you saw? Repeated giveaways every game I watched. Keith had some as well but overall he was much better than Seabrook was all season. I would gladly remove him from the lineup as well as his salary for what he brings to the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFanForever Posted April 25, 2012 Share Posted April 25, 2012 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 02:18 PM) Repeated giveaways every game I watched. Keith had some as well but overall he was much better than Seabrook was all season. I would gladly remove him from the lineup as well as his salary for what he brings to the team. I don't think is nearly the player he was 2 years ago. He has looked pretty shaky recently. I thought Seabs actually played pretty well this year, especially in the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Peverly has had a short fuse this year. And he's been a whiny b****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 08:11 AM) He didn't actually touch him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 11:04 AM) He didn't actually touch him. Yeah, that makes Holtby's reaction even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 Gotcha. If others didn't see it on different angles, you'd think he got him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 02:00 PM) yup. I think he's overrated, overpaid and declining. He gives up goals by the bunches. I detest Seabrook. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 26, 2012 Share Posted April 26, 2012 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 01:54 PM) I agree. I like you. I may even give you a nickname. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Game 7s FTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farmteam Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 04:39 PM) I like you. I may even give you a nickname. The highest of all high honors! (Pun thoroughly intended.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Not sure where else to put this but http://host.madison.com/sports/college/hoc...19bb2963f4.html Wisconsin v. Minnesota at Soldier Field next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 27, 2012 -> 01:29 PM) Not sure where else to put this but http://host.madison.com/sports/college/hoc...19bb2963f4.html Wisconsin v. Minnesota at Soldier Field next year. That's the undercard. Miami vs. Notre Dame is the main event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Im not sure if anyone is being considered an "undercard". I can really only find information on Wisconsin- Minnesota (as that conceivably is the bigger game as its between 2 teams who have 11 NCAA championships between them). Supposedly Wisconsin is getting paid between $200-$250k to come (Wisconsin has one of the largest hockey stadiums of any NCAA team, Kohl Center holds 15,325) where as Notre Dame can only hold 5,000, Ohio 2,850 and Minnesota 9,305. From all accounts they are relying on a large Wisconsin turn out because Wisconsin sells out 15k and its replacing a home Wisconsin game (hence the payment to Wisconsin). Im sure that as its Chicago there will be a good amount of ND fans, ND hockey just isnt really comparable to Wisconsin though. I guess Im just not sure if the noon game or the late game is the "undercard". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 27, 2012 -> 02:06 PM) Im not sure if anyone is being considered an "undercard". I can really only find information on Wisconsin- Minnesota (as that conceivably is the bigger game as its between 2 teams who have 11 NCAA championships between them). Supposedly Wisconsin is getting paid between $200-$250k to come (Wisconsin has one of the largest hockey stadiums of any NCAA team, Kohl Center holds 15,325) where as Notre Dame can only hold 5,000, Ohio 2,850 and Minnesota 9,305. From all accounts they are relying on a large Wisconsin turn out because Wisconsin sells out 15k and its replacing a home Wisconsin game (hence the payment to Wisconsin). Im sure that as its Chicago there will be a good amount of ND fans, ND hockey just isnt really comparable to Wisconsin though. I guess Im just not sure if the noon game or the late game is the "undercard". I was just giving you a hard time for slighting the other game. That being said, since 2007, Miami & Notre Dame have been much more successful than Wisco or Minny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Yeah I could have mentioned both, I just was lazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyons Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Yay, Kings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Good to see that the real Brian Elliott finally showed up for STL. Go Kings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Mmmm...Kings/Yotes. That sounds...horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts