Steve9347 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I just want to know where this Mike Smith came from, because he used to be atrocious. Seriously, 2009-2011 while with Tampa Smith was one of the worst goaltenders in hockey - of course, the D in front of him was awful, but he'd have given up about 4 softies in any of these games with 40 shots on last year. I swear goaltending is the relief pitching of baseball these days. Save a few truly elite guys, the highs and lows of goaltending performance are completely random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 10:12 AM) I just want to know where this Mike Smith came from, because he used to be atrocious. Seriously, 2009-2011 while with Tampa Smith was one of the worst goaltenders in hockey - of course, the D in front of him was awful, but he'd have given up about 4 softies in any of these games with 40 shots on last year. I swear goaltending is the relief pitching of baseball these days. Save a few truly elite guys, the highs and lows of goaltending performance are completely random. Almost every cup winning team did it because of much greater talent than every other team or an incredibly hot goalie. If you look back and see teams that shouldnt have won the cup, its always because of a hot goalie. Nowadays these guys seem to come out of nowhere. I still think Nashville wins the cup, hot goalie, frustrating defense, physical play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 10:12 AM) I just want to know where this Mike Smith came from, because he used to be atrocious. Seriously, 2009-2011 while with Tampa Smith was one of the worst goaltenders in hockey - of course, the D in front of him was awful, but he'd have given up about 4 softies in any of these games with 40 shots on last year. I swear goaltending is the relief pitching of baseball these days. Save a few truly elite guys, the highs and lows of goaltending performance are completely random. How about Brian Elliot? The last two seasons he had save %'s of under .900, now he's f***ing Patrick Roy. I do think the quality of the defense in front of them is playing a big part in some of these goalies random successful seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Adam Jahns @adamjahns Looks like Lepisto is in again. Saad looks out for Shaw. #Blackhawks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 11:14 AM) Adam Jahns @adamjahns Looks like Lepisto is in again. Saad looks out for Shaw. #Blackhawks That really sucks.. I like what Saad has shown so far. Very smart and plays defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 11:28 AM) That really sucks.. I like what Saad has shown so far. Very smart and plays defense. That's surprised me the most from him. His backcheck has been pretty damn good and he's not afraid to use his body. His offensive talent wasn't on display much in the two games he played, but overall he looks like he'll be a quality player. He's got a similar body to Hossa (Saad 6'1 202, Hossa 6'1 210). It'd be phenomenal to get a poor man's Hossa out of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 I get why you don't play Saad, but I don't agree with it. However, Shaw has shown a great ability to rise to the occasion, so his being back is still an upgrade. It'd be nice if Saad could stay in the lineup vs a Brunette or a Morrison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 02:44 PM) I get why you don't play Saad, but I don't agree with it. However, Shaw has shown a great ability to rise to the occasion, so his being back is still an upgrade. It'd be nice if Saad could stay in the lineup vs a Brunette or a Morrison. Yeah, Bruno is the slowest man in the NHL, I wince every time he goes into the corner because I know he wont come out with the puck and he wont make it back to play defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 At least Shaw will go to the net on a shot from the point. Hopefully the Hawks keep playing like they did in Game 5. Just shoot towards the net. With Shaw back, he can just "get in the way." Also, other than the two softies in OT...the 'hawks have 12 goals...the 'yotes? 13. Crawford is doing a pretty good job, but to win a SC, your goalie needs to steal a game or two. Crow hasn't shown that ability, yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Calling it right now. Hawks win 4-2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 No OT would be nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 04:12 PM) Calling it right now. Hawks win 4-2. So two point goal in ot, pro beach hockey style. I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 05:24 PM) So two point goal in ot, pro beach hockey style. I like it. Ha. I feel like there has to be a game that doesn't hit OT at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Hawks just dominating to start, but no goal yet. Slav will say they have been outplayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Ladies and Gentlemen, Mike Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 08:23 PM) Ladies and Gentlemen, Mike Smith. I hate this freak. We could have 3 goals easy by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Damn you Mike Smith, damn you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Ugh. Hopefully that wasn't their best shot. They just owned the period about as well as humanly possible and got dick to show for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Soxfan1: Hawks being outplayed badly. Need to pick it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Fluke Phx goal coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Should be 3-0 Hawks. Smith robbed Shaw, Frolik shot wide, Bolland missed a (pretty much) empty net. Shots 16-2. Goals 0-0. The Hawks got outplayed. I wish they'd play like that for 60 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I still don't understand why they insist on putting Bruno on the PP unit.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 08:17 PM) Hawks just dominating to start, but no goal yet. Slav will say they have been outplayed. QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Apr 23, 2012 -> 08:47 PM) Soxfan1: Hawks being outplayed badly. Need to pick it up. Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 This is f***ing ridiculous. Slav is right, again. Shot 800 - 5, and f*** Corey Crawford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Crawford faces 5 shots and looks awful. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts