Baron Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...ml?eref=writers This was from yesterday but I didnt see it posted yet. Not surprising,but what does everyone want for him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 It has to be better than whatever draft pick we would get for him in FA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Baron @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 06:39 PM) http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...ml?eref=writers This was from yesterday but I didnt see it posted yet. Not surprising,but what does everyone want for him? Dan Hudson (sorry) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 They are shopping more than Edwin...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Trade Quentin for a young pitcher. Than trade Jackson for a young hitter. That would be nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 12:53 PM) Trade Quentin for a young pitcher. Than trade Jackson for a young hitter. That would be nice. Colby Rasmus is being shopped by STL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 PK would be such a great fit for that young AZ team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 12:50 PM) They are shopping more than Edwin...... Go on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 12:50 PM) They are shopping more than Edwin...... That much has to be obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 12:55 PM) Colby Rasmus is being shopped by STL. They could probably get something better than Jackson for him, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 02:13 PM) They could probably get something better than Jackson for him, right? The .742 OPS he's putting up this year isn't helping his trade value, but yes, they should still be able to get more than Jackson for him. That said, if Edwin Jackson is the best pitcher available on the trade market, and the Cardinals need a starter...well... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Edwin Jackson AND Carlos Quentin for Rasmus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 02:18 PM) Edwin Jackson AND Carlos Quentin for Rasmus Teams that have zero use for a corner OF: 1. St. Louis Cardinals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:18 PM) Edwin Jackson AND Carlos Quentin for Rasmus We should throw in John Danks to be safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:20 PM) We should throw in John Danks to be safe. You wouldn't make that deal?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:19 PM) Teams that have zero use for a corner OF: 1. St. Louis Cardinals. This is true. For some reason I was thinking in terms of them ditching an OF and getting one back, but obviously CQ can't be in center and is not starting over Holliday/Berkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:25 PM) You wouldn't make that deal?! I wouldn't trade Q alone for Rasmus, let alone with Jackson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 Haha, the puma back to centerfield. Then the cardinals can have the biggest raking lineup in the NL Central, and the worst UZR Outfield in the known history of man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 07:13 PM) They could probably get something better than Jackson for him, right? Atlanta seems to be a significantly better trade partner for Rasmus. However, if you can trade Danks for Rasmus and Quentin for Beachy, then sign me up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:17 PM) The .742 OPS he's putting up this year isn't helping his trade value, but yes, they should still be able to get more than Jackson for him. That said, if Edwin Jackson is the best pitcher available on the trade market, and the Cardinals need a starter...well... He's also been terrible defensively for them as well. They want pitching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 06:18 PM) Edwin Jackson AND Carlos Quentin for Rasmus Jackson and Rios and you have a deal. What would that trade accomplish? Quentin isn't that bad, folks. We need to find creative ways to dump Rios and Juan and Dunn and get Dayan up here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 02:29 PM) Atlanta seems to be a significantly better trade partner for Rasmus. However, if you can trade Danks for Rasmus and Quentin for Beachy, then sign me up. I have trouble seeing Atlanta wanting a long term OF solution like that, with the way they're talking up the defense they're playing righ tnow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 01:41 PM) Jackson and Rios and you have a deal. What would that trade accomplish? Quentin isn't that bad, folks. We need to find creative ways to dump Rios and Juan and Dunn and get Dayan up here. How many teams are going to want our overpaid terrible players with long contracts? You're making it sound like there's a demand for Rios, Peavy and Pierre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 06:45 PM) How many teams are going to want our overpaid terrible players with long contracts? You're making it sound like there's a demand for Rios, Peavy and Pierre. None. That's why I said "creative" ways to trade. I think Jackson and Quentin for Rasmus would be idiotic. Jackson must be a headcase cause he still has good stuff (I guess Cooper can't fix this one) and Quentin is a good player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 12, 2011 Share Posted July 12, 2011 QUOTE (greg775 @ Jul 12, 2011 -> 02:46 PM) None. That's why I said "creative" ways to trade. I think Jackson and Quentin for Rasmus would be idiotic. Jackson must be a headcase cause he still has good stuff (I guess Cooper can't fix this one) and Quentin is a good player. I don't know if Jackson is a headcase...I think his biggest problem is the lack of a third remotely effective pitch. He's all 2 pitches...fastball slider. If both of those pitches are on 100% of the time, then he's near unhittable. If either of those pitches isn't giving him control that day though, then he's rapidly a 1-pitch pitcher or worse. He can still win some of those games because 1 of those pitches is a 96 mph fastball, but he has to throw a lot of pitches to win a game like that if he doesn't have the slider. Throw in one more pitch that comes in the low to mid 80's, even if it's not hugely effective every game, and suddenly even on days where he has no control over the slider, he can keep people off balance by changing velocity. Or, similarly, get him to do a better job of changing up the velocity on his fastball. Something. He just doesn't have the repertoire needed to be an everyday starter unless his 2 pitches are there all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.