Balta1701 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:15 AM) Or it could be another trade because technically this trade opens up 2 spots. There could be another deal that opens 1 spot, or they could be DLing Lilli. Its all speculation. No, it opens up 1 spot, Frasor takes the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 i see a member of our bullpen possibly moving soon as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Keep in mind, if the Jays flip him to St Louis for Rasmus, they also have much nicer pieces down on the farm they can send along with him. Just because they are able to get Rasmus out of Jackson, does not mean we necessarily could have as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapzk Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:15 AM) Or it could be another trade because technically this trade opens up 2 spots. There could be another deal that opens 1 spot, or they could be DLing Lilli. Its all speculation. Well they get Frasor but he won't be in the game for today I suspect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:09 AM) If they flip him for Rasmus... I'll be done. I'll officially be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 AA has mind control powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Unless its taking something like Lawrie + Jackson to get Rasmus, and then it just was an impossibility for the Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (kapzk @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 09:12 AM) Good thing u didn't agree for the 5K bet with the other poster last night that this trade is BS Yeah, good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:12 AM) @SI_JonHeyman - Word is, #bluejays may spin e-jax to #stlcards if get him from #chisox @DKnobler - I hear if Edwin Jackson, Teahen go to Toronto, good chance they don't stay there (i.e. get flipped to third team). And yes, third team would likely be Cardinals (Rasmus) Kenny asleep at the wheel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:12 AM) @SI_JonHeyman - Word is, #bluejays may spin e-jax to #stlcards if get him from #chisox @DKnobler - I hear if Edwin Jackson, Teahen go to Toronto, good chance they don't stay there (i.e. get flipped to third team). And yes, third team would likely be Cardinals (Rasmus) How does that make sense? If we could do that ourselves why deal with tor? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klaus kinski Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 So, it could be Daniel Hudson, Edwin Jackson and Mark Teahen for George Frasor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:11 AM) That's the only wat this makes sense. Toronto spent a couple million to get themselves a sandwich pick in the Miguel Olivo deal last year. They're willing to do things like this to stockpile draft picks, they've already proven that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulokis Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 KW needs to go if Jackson nets a bigger deal from Blue Jays. With KW recently, even if other teams want our guys, we dont get anything good in return like Vazquez and Swish trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 There are quite a few contenders in on Frasor, he may not be staying here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 09:17 AM) I'll be done. I'll officially be done. Me too, I hate to say... This, as reported, is indefensible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (klaus kinski @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:17 AM) So, it could be Daniel Hudson, Edwin Jackson and Mark Teahen for George Frasor. Don't forget Holmberg! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:14 AM) No, there's no one else the sox can move to create a roster spot unless someone is going on the DL in the next hour and we have no idea. De Aza starting means someone has been dealt. That's what I was wondering. If this deal doesn't get done very soon there's got to be another spot opening (or already open) in order for DeAza to play today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Frasor wouldnt be playing today, meaning if this deal was done Sox probably would have wanted to call up an emergency pitcher. Its not a necessity because Jackson is a starter but they already have Humber in the pen and he isnt being used so if they dont call up a reliever and dont have Frasor they are really thin today. If they were so sure this deal was done, theyd have called up a reliever for 1 day to just send down the next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapzk Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:17 AM) How does that make sense? If we could do that ourselves why deal with tor? We most likely didn't have the prospects to deal for with Jackson. I think its probably Toronto who called KW for Jackson just so they can deal him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:17 AM) Keep in mind, if the Jays flip him to St Louis for Rasmus, they also have much nicer pieces down on the farm they can send along with him. Just because they are able to get Rasmus out of Jackson, does not mean we necessarily could have as well Depends on if they send a prospect with, and who that prospect is. If it's Lawrie, that's one thing. If it's a similar guy to Cooper, I say we march to Kenny's doorsteps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 I swear to God. I love Rasmus so f***ing much, and we're going to help him go to f***ing Toronto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:18 AM) Frasor wouldnt be playing today, meaning if this deal was done Sox probably would have wanted to call up an emergency pitcher. Its not a necessity because Jackson is a starter but they already have Humber in the pen and he isnt being used so if they dont call up a reliever and dont have Frasor they are really thin today. If they were so sure this deal was done, theyd have called up a reliever for 1 day to just send down the next. I don't think that "Unavailable due to trade" clears up a roster spot for a day, I think the guy still holds that roster spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 10:19 AM) I swear to God. I love Rasmus so f***ing much, and we're going to help him go to f***ing Toronto. His fire won't be burning in our outfield. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 27, 2011 -> 11:19 AM) I swear to God. I love Rasmus so f***ing much, and we're going to help him go to f***ing Toronto. It'd have been Jackson + viciedo, I'd bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Wow so now everyone is in love with Rasmus? I remember a bunch of people saying his was Rios 2.0. Now were screaming at Kenny because he may not want him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.