Jump to content

MLB CBA Thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (DirtySox @ Nov 22, 2011 -> 01:57 PM)
It severely cripples teams like the Royals, Pirates, Jays, and Nationals. It's going to hurt them much more than teams like the Red Sox and Rangers. But otherwise yes, the teams in the middle will benefit from this.

It does not cripple them in any way. It doesn't make it more difficult for them to sign players, it actually makes it easier for them to sign players they draft early in the first round. There's no more "Does Stras need $50 million" to worry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 22, 2011 -> 01:17 PM)
DKnobler DKnobler

Pre-draft drug testing for the top 200 prospects

 

SI_JonHeyman Jon Heyman

Drafted players may only sign minor-league deals now. #MLB, #cba

 

 

QUOTE (DirtySox @ Nov 22, 2011 -> 01:18 PM)
Minor league deals only? Terrible.

Again, this avoids the "We're going to call you up and start your arbitration clock immediately" clause that screwed the Tigers over on Andrew Miller. Put the guy on a minor league deal, give him his bonus, and if he's ready to be called up on day 1, call him up for that reason, not money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buster_ESPN Buster Olney

Current players have taken action more aggressively than previous generation to get their sport clean, to level their playing field.

 

Buster_ESPN Buster Olney

It is taken as fact by some GMs/managers/players that some players are cheating with PEDs/HGH now. Union targeting them with its HGH stance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JR is doing the polka at Bud's house Thanksgiving night! The Sox spent $2.786,300 on draft picks this past summer, according to Baseball America - lowest among the majors' 30 teams. They also spent a major league-low $18,327,450 on amateur bonuses from 2007-11, according to Baseball America. Hard to build a farm system with investment in minor league system that bad, it is like trying to eat corn on the cob with no f'n teeth! :lolhitting

Edited by Soxfest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 22, 2011 -> 01:47 PM)
It does not cripple them in any way. It doesn't make it more difficult for them to sign players, it actually makes it easier for them to sign players they draft early in the first round. There's no more "Does Stras need $50 million" to worry about.

 

This isn't hard to grasp. The Royals/Pirates etc haven't had trouble signing players they pick in the 1st round. They have been opening their wallets for tons of players seeking over-slot throughout the entire draft, despite the round. This is why they have been leading baseball in overslot bonuses these last few years. These teams have chosen to build from within, as they need to, and have spent accordingly. These teams take advantage of those that are too cheap or too stupid to invest in amateur talent that might cost a premium. The CBA effectively ends this practice by essentially allowing any team to select said talent as prices are now largely restricted with this over cap tax. I can't fathom that people think this is good for said teams. The overwhelming consensus is that this is terrible for them. This isn't just some random whim here. It's astounding that people think otherwise.

 

KG put it as succinct as possible:

 

 

Kevin_Goldstein Kevin Goldstein

You know how the Royals have a great system? They did that through spending big money on the draft. Strategy now basically illegal.

2 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

 

 

Kevin_Goldstein Kevin Goldstein

You know how the Rangers have a remarkable wealth of high-ceiling talent due to incredible international work? Strategy now illegal.

3 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 22, 2011 -> 05:47 PM)
I find this bonkers that people are so concerned about the pirates royals and rangers. Honestly who cares.

 

Not I. And to be honest, they've had their run of quite a few years of unfettered spending on the draft. They all should have a quality farm moving forward by this point, so shut the f*** up and play those hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JeffPassan Jeff Passan

Starting in 2016, teams from the top 15 markets no longer will receive revenue sharing. Today, would affect Washington, Toronto and Houston.

 

MLB has a formula to define market size. Includes population, TV market, revenue and other factors. Eg: Despite Bay Area, Oakland small mkt.

 

JeffPassan Jeff Passan

Another person in the room says GM vote was 24-6 for hard slotting. Either way, vast, vast majority went along with idea. Wasn't just Selig.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JeffPassan Jeff Passan

The slots for the Nos. 1-4 picks in the draft are going to be $7.2M, $6.2M, $5.2M and $4.2M. Teams are not, however, required to spend that.

 

JeffPassan Jeff Passan

The team picking first, for example, can take a player No. 1 overall for $4M and spread the remaining $3.2M out over other picks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Nov 23, 2011 -> 01:18 AM)
Not I. And to be honest, they've had their run of quite a few years of unfettered spending on the draft. They all should have a quality farm moving forward by this point, so shut the f*** up and play those hands.

 

Those tweets "know how this team has a great farm, that's now ILLEGAL" oh boo hoo. The system is changing. You know those examples of those awful teams picking bad players for signability? Probably will be less of those. Plus by discouraging high school players now, these worse teams can get talent closer to the MLB in the draft. Yes, these teams were finding good value in the OLD system, but was the OLD system perfect? I don't think so. Just because people say X is better than Y doesn't make it so. Spend money getting great draft evaluators...the new value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 23, 2011 -> 09:55 AM)
Those tweets "know how this team has a great farm, that's now ILLEGAL" oh boo hoo. The system is changing. You know those examples of those awful teams picking bad players for signability? Probably will be less of those. Plus by discouraging high school players now, these worse teams can get talent closer to the MLB in the draft. Yes, these teams were finding good value in the OLD system, but was the OLD system perfect? I don't think so. Just because people say X is better than Y doesn't make it so. Spend money getting great draft evaluators...the new value.

 

Good points. It did sound pretty bitter from guys who were probably a bit more biased because of their paychecks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...