Jump to content

Braun tests postitive for PEDs


Sockin

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (GoSox05 @ Dec 12, 2011 -> 09:40 AM)
I wonder if he has been doing this his whole career.

 

Do players get tested just once a year?

 

Under the MLB drug program, each player on a team’s 40-man roster, including those in the minors, is subject to at least two random drug tests each season. Some players are tested randomly beyond that, and also during the postseason, when Braun reportedly tested positive.

 

Boston herald

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 388
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (knightni @ Dec 10, 2011 -> 08:11 PM)
Scenarios:

 

New trainer - different linament - not aware that it had PEDs in it.

 

Health Club - tried health drink - PEDs not listed in ingredients.

 

GNC guy lied to him.

 

. . .

 

 

Just thinking up Braun's excuses for him.

 

Tejada gave me b12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question... I wonder if any player contracts in baseball contain out-clauses for the guaranteed money, for illegal behavior or suspensions due to breaking league rules? And further, if any teams have pushed to have contracts that null out all future guaranteed monies if a player tests positive for a PED?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 12, 2011 -> 10:18 AM)
Here's a question... I wonder if any player contracts in baseball contain out-clauses for the guaranteed money, for illegal behavior or suspensions due to breaking league rules? And further, if any teams have pushed to have contracts that null out all future guaranteed monies if a player tests positive for a PED?

I think that at this point it's pretty clear no one in baseball has that out clause. The Dodgers were probably the most likely to use it, they could have saved themselves a fortune on Manroid, for example. My guess is that the union made sure that it wasn't allowed when they agreed to the testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 12, 2011 -> 10:21 AM)
I think that at this point it's pretty clear no one in baseball has that out clause. The Dodgers were probably the most likely to use it, they could have saved themselves a fortune on Manroid, for example. My guess is that the union made sure that it wasn't allowed when they agreed to the testing.

 

Theoretically, you wouldn't need an out clause. All contracts formed under a CBA are subject to the rules in that CBA regardless of the language of the player's contract. Under basic contract principles this contract is likely voidable because the use of PED's is illegal and if the benefits of that use lead to the contract formation then the team (assuming their belief that Braun was clean) should be able to void the remainder of the contract. Of course, you have to prove that he was doing it at the time of contracting. Not later. Later positive tests are covered by the CBA as we already know.

 

The reason we don't see this, IMO, is threefold:

1. The union is not going to allow that without litigation which would be hellacious given the money involved and the precedent.

2. The team doesn't want the world finding out that they knew or should have known that he was on PEDs, which, by and large, is probably the case.

3. Negative perception to future players.

 

Someone else may have better information that I, but that's my stab at it.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to drug testing experts, though, passing a subsequent test is not, in and of itself, a valid defense and actually fits the pattern of some previous doping cases. US Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart has no specific knowledge of the Braun case, but says that a testosterone level that goes from normal, to high, to normal is typical of someone on a steroid cycle. "After a person stops using, the T:E ratio" -- that's the testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio, which is 1:1 in most people, and above 4:1 in positive tests -- "goes back down to normal levels, and that could be in a matter of days or hours. It depends on how much they used, how long they've been using, and their own individual metabolism." Research done by German scientists showed that one particular drug boosted a patient's T:E ratio above 80:1 before it dropped back to normal only 12 hours later.

 

SI

 

So he probably was tested very shortly after starting a cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 12, 2011 -> 05:37 PM)
And if he'd been tested twice already this year, that kinda makes sense, as he probably wouldn't expect to be hit with a surprise test during the postseason.

I think testing is fairly regular though in the postseason...he shouldn't have been too surprised to be selected for testing then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Dec 12, 2011 -> 10:28 PM)
Very disappointing. Can only hope it leads to further calls for testing that has a chance to keep up with the cheating.

 

Still can't trust our beloved game, sadly.

 

The blood testing along with HGH will go a long way towards doing this. Much more difficult to cheat a blood test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Dec 11, 2011 -> 12:54 PM)
Source: Braun tested positive for a prohibited substance, not a performance-enhancing drug. More coming on FOXSports.com -- Ken Rosenthal

 

So gonna go with GUY at the GNC told me excuse?

 

 

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 11, 2011 -> 05:26 PM)
JeffPassan Jeff Passan

Another source said WADA lab tests B sample using IRMS -- a carbon-isotope-ratio test. Experts say false positives are almost impossible.

 

BenBadler Ben Badler

NY Daily News source on Braun's test results: "Insanely high...twice the level of the highest test ever taken.

 

effPassan Jeff Passan

Union could fight it since Braun technically tested positive during old CBA, during which major leaguers found guilty were still protected

 

JeffPassan Jeff Passan

Source also confirmed that MLB has not lost an arbitration case with PEDs.

Just to add an extra stress to this one point:

Ryan Braun's positive test for testosterone showed a level that was extremely elevated, and likely the highest that has been recorded in Major League Baseball, according to sources with knowledge of the NL MVP's test.

...

 

A source with knowledge of Braun's test result said that his MLB test was positive for a banned substance, but not a steroid or drug. Braun may argue that he ingested dietary supplements tainted with testosterone or testosterone-boosting ingredients not listed on the label. The supplements would presumably have to be very tainted to produce what sources say was his extremely high T:E ratio.

 

According to a source who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the process was supposed to remain confidential, when Braun learned of his positive test in October he voluntarily took another test at an independent lab that showed normal testosterone levels. Neither Braun's spokesman nor his attorney immediately returned messages asking whether Braun's voluntary test was analyzed for banned substances that might still be detectable even once the T:E ratio had dropped.

 

It is unlikely that Braun will argue, as some have speculated, that he inadvertently ingested dehydroepiandrosterone, or DHEA, in a dietary supplement. DHEA is converted in the body to testosterone, but is not banned by MLB. Since the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, DHEA has been legal to sell over the counter. (It can be found on plenty of labels at GNC or Vitamin Shoppe.) DHEA can elevate testosterone levels, but it has a specific metabolite that anti-doping laboratories look for, so the World Anti-Doping Association-accredited lab in Montreal, where Braun's test was analyzed after the initial high testosterone result, would have been able to tell if DHEA was the culprit.

 

Braun's voluntary test -- which showed normal testosterone levels -- came a few weeks after his positive test, and is expected to be part of his defense at arbitration. A source suggested that because Braun had passed previous tests and then passed his voluntary test, the fact that the one test produced such an extraordinarily high testosterone level may be used to suggest a problem with the testing or accidental one-time ingestion of a banned substance.

 

According to drug testing experts, though, passing a subsequent test is not, in and of itself, a valid defense and actually fits the pattern of some previous doping cases. US Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart has no specific knowledge of the Braun case, but says that a testosterone level that goes from normal, to high, to normal is typical of someone on a steroid cycle. "After a person stops using, the T:E ratio" -- that's the testosterone-to-epitestosterone ratio, which is 1:1 in most people, and above 4:1 in positive tests -- "goes back down to normal levels, and that could be in a matter of days or hours. It depends on how much they used, how long they've been using, and their own individual metabolism." Research done by German scientists showed that one particular drug boosted a patient's T:E ratio above 80:1 before it dropped back to normal only 12 hours later.

 

Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writ...l#ixzz1gQCBZj00

Whatever the exact details are...he had an enormous amount of a foreign, performance enhancing substance in his system at the time of a test (something that was not an amphetamine), his sample was tested several times in several different ways by MLB, and the fact that he was tested again a few weeks later pretty much establishes nothing since the body could have returned to normal by then...and he waited weeks after being required to pee in the cup, not hours.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Dec 13, 2011 -> 09:35 AM)
Let's not lose sight of this fact: I've been dominating the Soxtalk Keeper League ever since I added Braun in his rookie season.

 

That is the absolute most important thing to result from this positive test. It might actually give J4L a chance at beating me.

 

Like with Ryan Braun's MVP, we will now have to add an asterisk to each of your last two championships in that league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen anything to suggest that MLB has a mechanism to strip a player of an award earned while using PED's. But if you really want to be technical, the MVP is voted on what he did during the season and he only tested positive during the postseason, so they couldn't even get that accomplished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...