Jump to content

Should Lillibridge be in our everyday lineup in 2012?


sunofgold

Recommended Posts

Looking at the roster and considering his play in 2011, shouldn't Lillibridge be in the "running" to be an everyday player for us in 2012. Played good defense last year, and showed some unexpected power. Great speed.

 

Could make the argument that our best outfield would consist of Lillibridge (LF or RF), DeAza (CF), and The Tanks (LF or RF). Rios could be our 4th OFer if you have a fair competition in spring training.

 

I think that Lillibridge has played well for us and at least has earned the chance to play for a starting job in spring training. What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open competition for 2b but give Beckham the leg up. We're better off if Gordon can ever turn it around. It's worth chasing that hope and (maybe)dream for the greater reward

 

With Lilli you might be adding a few wins but killing Gordon's value in trades, killing the shrinking chance he'll develop into an all-star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well he's not great, but the whole 500-600 at-bats logic doesn't matter if we're completely devoid of passable talent at 2b at the major league level or nearMLB-ready level.

 

awful to say, but lilli may be the best talent we have for 2b. but that is something you have to determine in spring training and then decide how many wins it's worth to you to stall Beckham's development/value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Princess Dye @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 07:10 PM)
well he's not great, but the whole 500-600 at-bats logic doesn't matter if we're completely devoid of passable talent at 2b at the major league level or nearMLB-ready level.

 

awful to say, but lilli may be the best talent we have for 2b. but that is something you have to determine in spring training and then decide how many wins it's worth to you to stall Beckham's development/value

Beckham ought to get the first month at least just to see if he can snap his head into the game, longer if he has a good spring. Same for Rios and De Aza. After that, start playing whoever is earning it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Princess Dye @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:10 PM)
well he's not great, but the whole 500-600 at-bats logic doesn't matter if we're completely devoid of passable talent at 2b at the major league level or nearMLB-ready level.

 

awful to say, but lilli may be the best talent we have for 2b. but that is something you have to determine in spring training and then decide how many wins it's worth to you to stall Beckham's development/value

 

He's not an everyday talent. Sure, Beckham could implode again and he (Lillibridge) would be the guy by default. That doesn't mean he should play everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:16 PM)
He's not an everyday talent. Sure, Beckham could implode again and he (Lillibridge) would be the guy by default. That doesn't mean he should play everyday.

 

So based on what you're saying, Beckham is unquestionably the everyday talent and Lilli is not? Just to make sure I'm following your logic.

 

To me, it's way more hazy than that. Thanks to GB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (sunofgold @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 05:57 PM)
Looking at the roster and considering his play in 2011, shouldn't Lillibridge be in the "running" to be an everyday player for us in 2012. Played good defense last year, and showed some unexpected power. Great speed.

 

Could make the argument that our best outfield would consist of Lillibridge (LF or RF), DeAza (CF), and The Tanks (LF or RF). Rios could be our 4th OFer if you have a fair competition in spring training.

 

I think that Lillibridge has played well for us and at least has earned the chance to play for a starting job in spring training. What do you think?

 

A chance to play, OK. Nothing more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Princess Dye @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:19 PM)
So based on what you're saying, Beckham is unquestionably the everyday talent and Lilli is not? Just to make sure I'm following your logic.

 

To me, it's way more hazy than that. Thanks to GB.

 

Yes. This team has no chance at contending. Give Gordon 500 ABs and see what happens. Lillibridge peaked last year. That's as good as it's gonna get for him. I don't want to see him in the lineup everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:11 PM)
Beckham ought to get the first month at least just to see if he can snap his head into the game, longer if he has a good spring. Same for Rios and De Aza. After that, start playing whoever is earning it.

Give Beckham the whole year or at least most of it. Next year should not be about competing, but determing what we have and to start building for 2013 & 2014. This coming season is really Beckham's make-or-break year and I'm not going to let a poor April convince me it's time to give up on him. Not when Lillibridge is next on the depth chart.

 

I still have serious concerns about Lillibridge. I'm fine with him as a backup OF/IF next year, but he's going to have to prove to me that last year wasn't a fluke before I consider him for anything more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lillibridge strikes out a lot, but 13HRs in 186abs is very impressive. I really didn't think about replacing Beckham. I haven't given up on Beckham and Beckham's defense was very good last year.

 

I am thinking though that Lillibridge outplayed Dunn and Rios last year. I say let him compete in spring training for a starting job against Rios mainly. And maybe somewhat against Dunn if you start Lillibridge and bench Dunn when we face lefties.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lillibridge will get exposed by everyday play.

 

He's fine if you maximize his performance by matching him up with the best possible opposing pitchers for his skill-set.

 

In that sense, there's a big question about both DeAza and Brent...whether either one could stand up for 600+ at-bats in a full season.

 

From his time at UGA, 2009 and half of 2010, Beckham deserves at least 4 months of play this season (simply because of his defensive improvements) to get things turned around offensively...if he doesn't, he's going to be worth about as much as Joe Borchard when he was traded for Matt Thornton.

 

That still leaves you with the likes of Martinez, Escobar and Kuhn in the middle infield. Probably best to leave Brent in the OF instead of moving him around from season to season, like we've already done with Beckham and Dayan.

 

Before 2011, Lillibridge wasn't close to a threat for everyday play in the majors. If he earns it, like he did last season, great. But not counting on it.

 

 

 

Benching Rios serves what purpose? We're doubtful to be competitive with him playing OR with him sitting on the bench, so we have to try to extract the most possible ROI when we do try to dump his salary eventually. Sitting on the bench the whole season is going to cost us $30 million instead of maybe $10-12-15 million in future payroll outlays.

 

Dunn and Rios have to begin the year as starters and play close to everyday (you can sit Dunn against LHP until he gets his confidence back, HOPEFULLY)...as much as it will pain Greg and Ozzie, they have to play.

 

 

 

 

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lillibridge, Beckham, DeAza

Have a spring battle and let the best two play. They are big boys. Whoever finishes 3rd will still get playing time and try to earn the spot. None of them are 10 million dollar players that need to justify salary. I would argue that salary should not matter this year. Add Rios to the competition too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:06 PM)
Hell no. Brent Lillibridge with 550-600+ ABs in a season? That's no good. Say what you will about Ozzie - but he did right by Brent last year. 200-250 ABs tops is what a guy with his skill-set warrants.

BL is a utility guy ONLY.............I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a problem in American management whereby people are promoted until they exceed their capabilities, then are stuck in a position at which they do not excel, leading to incompetence at every level. I agree with the people who think we should avoid that problem with Lillibridge and keep him in a spot where he excels: the bench.

 

Additionally, I don't think there should be an open competition with Beckham because Beckham is still significantly younger, offers a much greater potential reward and played GG-caliber defense last season. Unless Lilli shows he can play that level of defense on top of his bat (which has probably peaked) it doesn't make sense to bench Beckham. Particularly not in a year that, by all accounts, is meant for development and the long-term good of the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 06:06 PM)
Hell no. Brent Lillibridge with 550-600+ ABs in a season? That's no good. Say what you will about Ozzie - but he did right by Brent last year. 200-250 ABs tops is what a guy with his skill-set warrants.

 

This is the correct answer. Lilli is the perfect 4th outfielder, but anything more than that and you may be setting him up to fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Jan 16, 2012 -> 10:54 PM)
There's a problem in American management whereby people are promoted until they exceed their capabilities, then are stuck in a position at which they do not excel, leading to incompetence at every level. I agree with the people who think we should avoid that problem with Lillibridge and keep him in a spot where he excels: the bench.

 

Additionally, I don't think there should be an open competition with Beckham because Beckham is still significantly younger, offers a much greater potential reward and played GG-caliber defense last season. Unless Lilli shows he can play that level of defense on top of his bat (which has probably peaked) it doesn't make sense to bench Beckham. Particularly not in a year that, by all accounts, is meant for development and the long-term good of the club.

"Peter Principle"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone should have to earn their playing time, which will be a challenge for several of our players.

That said, Lillibridge is almost as good versus LHP as Dunn is bad. Based upon last season, I think you have to give Dunn's at bats against LHP to Brent.

 

I would like to see Viciedo at DH and Lillibridge in the outfield vs. LHP, at least until Dunn proves that he can at least hit RHP.

Unfortunately, Dunn has to hit vs. RHP, no matter how badly he performs, due to his contract, and our lack of LH hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Lillian @ Jan 17, 2012 -> 05:56 AM)
Everyone should have to earn their playing time, which will be a challenge for several of our players.

 

This is why I want an open competition to let the cream rise to the top. The last several years, it was obvious that several players were getting playing time they did not deserve. There were also players who would earn the playing time and then not be allowed to start more than a couple of days in a row. That has to demoralize a team. I think Ventura, or any new manager should walk in the door with everyone on equal footing. That gives guys like Lillibridge hope and enthusiasm because he knows he has a real opportunity to win the job. It also give guys who had been the anointed starters a jolt of competitive drive to keep their jobs. I think these guys will come in motivated with a fresh attitude because of new leadership and being embarrassed by last year. Let the best man win. Let the loser know he can win the job back and will get playing time. It would only make the team better in my opinion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (103 mph screwball @ Jan 17, 2012 -> 09:38 AM)
This is why I want an open competition to let the cream rise to the top. The last several years, it was obvious that several players were getting playing time they did not deserve. There were also players who would earn the playing time and then not be allowed to start more than a couple of days in a row. That has to demoralize a team. I think Ventura, or any new manager should walk in the door with everyone on equal footing. That gives guys like Lillibridge hope and enthusiasm because he knows he has a real opportunity to win the job. It also give guys who had been the anointed starters a jolt of competitive drive to keep their jobs. I think these guys will come in motivated with a fresh attitude because of new leadership and being embarrassed by last year. Let the best man win. Let the loser know he can win the job back and will get playing time. It would only make the team better in my opinion.

The problem with that thinking is that "Having to re-earn your job" can demoralize a veteran. Of course, the only one I can really think of who might have that problem on this roster is AJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...