LowerCaseRepublican Posted August 12, 2003 Share Posted August 12, 2003 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._pcworld/111956 MIT and BC went against the RIAA claiming that the Washington DC filed subpoenas didn't hold water in MA. And a judge agreed. So this may mean that the RIAA will have to file individual subpoenas in every local area where they think downloading is going on...a much more costly procedure. :finger RIAA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted August 12, 2003 Share Posted August 12, 2003 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._pcworld/111956 MIT and BC went against the RIAA claiming that the Washington DC filed subpoenas didn't hold water in MA. And a judge agreed. So this may mean that the RIAA will have to file individual subpoenas in every local area where they think downloading is going on...a much more costly procedure. :finger RIAA! Less RIAA.........More Music Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted August 12, 2003 Share Posted August 12, 2003 yesssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASHWOUND Posted August 12, 2003 Share Posted August 12, 2003 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._pcworld/111956 MIT and BC went against the RIAA claiming that the Washington DC filed subpoenas didn't hold water in MA. And a judge agreed. So this may mean that the RIAA will have to file individual subpoenas in every local area where they think downloading is going on...a much more costly procedure. :finger RIAA! Less RIAA.........More Music Although I wish now the RIAA would have stopped me from downloading Flock of Seagulls-I ran... I can't stop listening to this song GASHWOUND :dips*** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.