Marty34 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 7, 2012 -> 10:13 PM) I love the irony of you jumping on someone for being all over the place. As usual I have no idea what you are talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 7, 2012 -> 10:18 PM) As usual I have no idea what you are talking about. I didn't think you would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 QUOTE (mcgrad70 @ Apr 7, 2012 -> 08:35 PM) Me either. Sox fans just have a hard time dealing with certain realities. They are content to having a second rate organization in no worse than the third largest baseball market in the known universe. I'm not. And I don't want to hear about 2005. A bunch of marginal players had career years and they won. They have one hall of fame candidate from that team - and he didn't even play in the series. They haven't come anywhere to being that good since. Where I come from that's one-hit wonder. So between Michael Jordan whom he inherited (and b****ed about paying) and 2005, Reinsdorf is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Good god this post is just filled with awful. One of the worst posts I've ever seen on this board. Truly impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 Konerko and Buehrle are very borderline candidates, but it's more of a compliment to the team and organization that a bunch of unsung and underappreciated players pulled together and had that type of season. It's like criticizing the Cardinals for 2006 and 2011 for their regular season play, then saying, well, they had Albert Pujols, so they actually deserved those titles. The 2005 post-season was never in doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted April 8, 2012 Share Posted April 8, 2012 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 8, 2012 -> 06:24 PM) Konerko and Buehrle are very borderline candidates, but it's more of a compliment to the team and organization that a bunch of unsung and underappreciated players pulled together and had that type of season. It's like criticizing the Cardinals for 2006 and 2011 for their regular season play, then saying, well, they had Albert Pujols, so they actually deserved those titles. The 2005 post-season was never in doubt. I love how a group of marginal players were able to compile the best playoff record of all time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 (edited) http://www.suntimes.com/sports/cowley/1188...-mentality.html From his one reliable quote/source left on the team, along with maybe AJ and Matt Thornton. Funny, maybe with Ozzie gone, Cowley probably decided he had to find someone else left to defend with the Sox, and now it's Peavy. Notice he spent more of his time in the Tigers clubhouse talking to their players than he did interacting with anyone else from the White Sox? And I'm sure he will never get tired of reminding everyone that the Tigers have the most talented team in the division (or maybe AL if you add Victor Martinez to that line-up) and that the White Sox will fade again in September. That never gets old for him. Notice he hasn't written one official column about Guillen since the story broke? Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens Tuesday night in Miami. Edited April 15, 2012 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 The first few paragraphs of this article is about how awesome and amazing the Tigers are, and how they know it. Also, why the hell is he in the Tigers clubhouse? Most Sox beat reporters RARELY go into the opposition's clubhouse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I'm sure his smarmy retort is that he's no longer the White Sox beat writer and doesn't write game stories or follow the team on a game-by-game basis. That he's paid to write feature/editorial/opinion/entertainment columns, which don't have a requirement of demonstrating any level of objectivity. Notice the guy he mostly quoted is a former Sox pitcher in Dotel? Plus, Ozzie Guillen is very close with Miguel Cabrera and Victor Martinez to a lesser extent. Obviously, he's no longer very welcome in the Sox clubhouse. Robin is too professional to do anything but treat him just like any other member of the media, but most in the locker room have a long memory, and Cowley's now on the wrong/losing side of the Guillen/KW showdown from last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Sox coverage in Chicago must have really gone down hill since I left if Cowley's stuff is the #1 most talked about articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 Paul Sullivan used to get more attention when he was writing the Sox beat stories than Gonzales, who I consider to be more professional and less opinionated or playing favorites. Telander's always been a favorite. Haugh's okay. Phil Rogers is what he is. Van Dyck and Ginnetti have been doing more of the Sox game stories this year, Cowley just writes his "editorial column" and doesn't pretend to be objective anymore. Then you have Rozner (who's not bad) and Imrem and mostly Scot Gregor with the Daily Herald. Ever since Mariotti left, things have been a lot quieter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetkincaid Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 What ever happened to the idea of making a COWLEY thread to contain everything about him in one place? For him to be so hated around here he sure gets a lot of attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 QUOTE (Chet Kincaid @ Apr 15, 2012 -> 09:22 AM) What ever happened to the idea of making a COWLEY thread to contain everything about him in one place? For him to be so hated around here he sure gets a lot of attention. This. I look at Cowley like the midwest term for the small flying insects that swarm a dog's genitals in the summer...."Pecker Gnat". That's basically what he is to me and I'll never even click on his hack stuff ever again. Eff him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 15, 2012 -> 07:13 AM) Haugh's okay. For years, I've tried to understand how David Haugh can remain employed by an esteemed paper like the Tribune. The one conclusion I keep arriving at is that he costs less than the writers that came before him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted April 15, 2012 Share Posted April 15, 2012 I'm confused by thread title Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 All righty, here we go. This is now the official thread for All Things Joe Cowley. Instead of having this discussion all over the place, and new threads every time he picks up his typewriter, they can all go here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Once Cowley sees he has his own thread, it's only gonna help boost his already super-inflated ego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 16, 2012 -> 10:32 AM) Once Cowley sees he has his own thread, it's only gonna help boost his already super-inflated ego. It is better than his crap ruining multiple other threads. It is like Filibuster for second rate sidekicks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 (edited) Poor Ozzie will feel left out. There's a Marlins thread, now a Joe Cowley thread, even a Mark Buehrle thread, but nothing devoted 100% to Ozzie. Wonder how Marty34 will feel about this thread, lol? Probably he will propose we create a similar thread to catalogue all the misdeess of one Kenneth Royal Williams and/or Don Cooper. Edited April 16, 2012 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 (edited) Cowley is entertaining. I agree with almost nothing he does, but I do read/follow. That is all enabled by the fact that I'm entertained but I don't take his stance/methods too seriously. And most of all, I don't take them as being horribly detrimental to the team. When the White Sox don't have drama, they actually get forgotten by a lot of the Chicagoland populace. If we want attention drawn to our wins, and thus attendance+dollars that later help free agency (if we believe that narrative) then we should want a writer with an axe to grind constantly writing about us. I actually enjoy these last few wins more because of how hard negative Cowley went on us this past offseason. Edited April 16, 2012 by Jose Paniagua Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Jose Bread + Water has a point. Cowley providing us free column inches of negative publicity, it's worth its weight in gold. Because he has the effect of galvanizing the fanbase against him in a way that nobody else does. Surely, his agenda isn't going to discourage any casual fans from going to the ballpark. Look at the attendance numbers Saturday and Sunday, probably 3-5,000 more for each game than would have been expected coming into the season. He's not unlike Gaston from Beauty and the Beast. You can't help but root against the guy....even though KW might be the "Beast" in this analogy, Cowley's constant sniping and attacks make him come out as an almost sympathetic character. You combine that with the quiet dignity, professionalism, humility yet a prevailing aura of confidence from Robin Ventura, you have the makings of a one-sided battle, especially after Ozzie's official come-uppance last week. When the best thing you can resort to is attacking Ventura for being too boring/vanilla or quoting Molina's stats every single start from Birmingham (conveniently ignoring both Santos and Santiago simultaneously), it makes for an interesting storyline which will inevitably end up in a bad way for Joe's career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 did i read that right or did Beauty and the Beast just get referenced? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Apr 16, 2012 -> 10:48 AM) did i read that right or did Beauty and the Beast just get referenced? Forget it, he's rolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Apr 16, 2012 -> 10:48 AM) did i read that right or did Beauty and the Beast just get referenced? Hey, it was the last animated movie to ever be nominated for Best Picture! Just enjoy the implied idea that Cowley thinks of himself as "Beauty/Truth/Integrity" in this situation, fighting a one man war like Don Quixote against the relentless repression of JR and KW and Don Cooper. Yes, now we're to literature references as well. Just heard this line in the Red Sox broadcast. "What do baseball and pancakes have in common? They both depend on the batter. Ha, ha, ha." So funny, NESN. Edited April 16, 2012 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 16, 2012 -> 10:55 AM) Hey, it was the last animated movie to ever be nominated for Best Picture! Just enjoy the implied idea that Cowley thinks of himself as "Beauty/Truth/Integrity" in this situation, fighting a one man war like Don Quixote against the relentless repression of JR and KW and Don Cooper. Yes, now we're to literature references as well. I wouldnt say "we"..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 C'mon Cowley, do your best. Let's see. First, revisit the terrible Edwin Jackson/Teahen for Frasor/Zach Stewart deal. Check. Remind everyone about how bad Rios and Dunn are... Point out that the White Sox system hasn't "raised" an All-Star caliber hitter from start to finish since the days of Crede, Rowand, Ordonez, Lee and Durham. (No, Gordon Beckham no longer can be considered a good or promising hitter at this point.) Point out the brutal attendance for a half-price night. Check. Remind everyone how good our starting rotation would look with Hudson and Gio Gonzalez out there, with Chris Young in CF, to boot. Remind everyone how nobody in baseball cares about the White Sox anymore because their manager is plain Jane/boring/vanilla. Maybe another paragraph on the bleak bleak future of Gordon Beckham, once compared favorably with Derek Jeter and a future franchise cornerstone and predicted replacement for Paulie/Buehrle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.