caulfield12 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 03:22 PM) For those that couldn't see the 9th, what happened with Rios? He took a high but clearly in the strike zone breaking ball over the plate for strike 3. Then stood at the plate arguing with the umpire while he got tagged out. There was very little chance he would have been safe, as the ball got away from the catcher's glove maybe 10-15 feet.....but he should have run to force the catcher to make the throw, maybe it gets away miraculously and the White Sox tie up the ballgame somehow. Just selfish instincts there to completely forget the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 04:22 PM) Before everyone blames Rios for not running (which most will do), blame him for looking at a pitch that close with 2 strikes. It's not natural for a hitter to run to 1st after a strike out where he didn't even swing the bat. Thats what Im mostly pissed about. Pretty clear it was a strike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) I guarantee AJ Pierzynski would have remembered the situation and run to first. He would have been out, but at least he would have been thinking up there correctly, with his head in the game. Just when you want to actually cheer for Alex Rios and believe for about the 10th time he's turning things around with the White Sox....he does something like that to make you angry with him again and you want to see him benched. Edited April 19, 2012 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 10:28 PM) I guarantee AJ Pierzynski would have remembered the situation and run to first. He would have been out, but at least he would have been thinking up there correctly, with his head in the game. He would have ran to first even if the catcher caught it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Let's see, Lillibridge gets his only start in the series against a RHP and strikes out 3 times. How can Robin not understand how to use him effectively? Also, Escobar should only be in the lineup when Alexei needs an off-day. He's just not a major leage hitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSidePride05 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Wow! At the start of the week, it looked like this might be an exciting team to watch this year. What a crappy series! And we only averaged 12,000 for the 4-game series. Probably the lowest attended 4-game series in the history of the new Comiskey/US Cellular Field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro2525 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) I hate this wierd in-between we're in. The Sox don't overly suck as a team(yet). And we want to believe that they will be able to compete for something into at least August. But there are so many negatives(strikeouts, defensive lapses, some horrific everyday players, mental midgets) that you figure this thing is going to implode sooner or later...in which case we are watching to see what the young guys can do...but outside of Jones, DeAza and Reed (Santiago??) most of them have been just awful. And if this boat sinks and Morel, Beckham, Stewart, Flowers, Escobar, Viciedo and Santiago continue to be bad...wtf are we left with? I just cringe at the worst case scenario going forward. Top that off with the mental mistakes we have been seeing...that we were hoping a new coach/voice would help negate. Edited April 19, 2012 by jeffro2525 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 All the catcher would have had to do is step on the plate, folks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) End of the feel good start to the season. Losing 3 of 4 at home to Baltimore is a joke. Sox only hope is to rake in the division this year which is possible when you play so many games against the s*** Royals, Indians and Twins. Ridiculous series for the mediocre Chicago White Sox. Can't even split with Baltimore at home. I don't appreciate the way the White Sox play the game. Whiff. Edited April 19, 2012 by greg775 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 QUOTE (greg775 @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 04:47 PM) End of the feel good start to the season. Losing 3 of 4 at home to Baltimore is a joke. Sox only hope is to rake in the division this year which is possible when you play so many games against the s*** Royals, Indians and Twins. Ridiculous series for the mediocre Chicago White Sox. Can't even split with Baltimore at home. I don't appreciate the way the White Sox play the game. Whiff. Coulda/shoulda taken 3 of 4... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 less than 12K attendance today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 10:25 PM) He took a high but clearly in the strike zone breaking ball over the plate for strike 3. Then stood at the plate arguing with the umpire while he got tagged out. There was very little chance he would have been safe, as the ball got away from the catcher's glove maybe 10-15 feet.....but he should have run to force the catcher to make the throw, maybe it gets away miraculously and the White Sox tie up the ballgame somehow. Just selfish instincts there to completely forget the situation. selfishness or just plain old frustration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Side Fireworks Man Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (iamshack @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 04:45 PM) All the catcher would have had to do is step on the plate, folks You are correct, Sir. This is one time where it's an overreaction to jump all over Rios for not running to first on that. Edited April 19, 2012 by South Side Fireworks Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (South Side Fireworks Man @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 05:16 PM) You are correct, Sir. This is one time where it's an overreaction to jump all over Rios for not running to first on that. What you and your "reasoned logic" have to understand is this board has several "old school" individuals that are so Chicago tough, so Clint Eastwood-like, that their fire and passion doesn't allow for common sense crap like that. These guys are rough and tumble, take no quarter, and still make the world go around from their rocking chairs. Edited April 19, 2012 by Jose Paniagua Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) And maybe the catcher has a brain cramp and forgets to touch home plate...so he throws to first but throws it away, too? The first reaction when a catcher sees a runner going for a base is to throw there. Maybe the pitcher comes to cover the plate to remind him, but the pitcher would have been so close they might have flubbed the exchange or SOMETHING. If you at least TRY to do something, instead of standing there arguing with the ump...watch baseball in the 1950's, 60's or 70's, you never would have seen a player do something like standing there arguing with the home plate umpire. Especially when Rios was the one who stuck his bat out enough on a check swing to put himself down in the count 0-1. You have to swing at anything close to the plate. Clearly, Viciedo (previous inning) and Rios were not expecting breaking balls after a steady diet of fastballs, but you have to be prepared to at least try to foul one off and stay alive, like Alexei Ramirez did on a breaking pitch that was away and off the plate. Edited April 20, 2012 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Damn us for losing to the AL East leading Orioles. Calm down everyone. Wait till May to meltdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) Losing all three of those games when we had multiple chances to tie or win (especially Tuesday with the 4-1 lead) has everyone a bit grump. That's something like 6 of our last 7 that we've lost to the Orioles at home. We no longer have much of a home field advantage. Back in 2005-2006-2008, we really protected our home turf. Recently, we seem to play better on the road. Even in 2010, I don't remember the splits, but it seems Beckham and Quentin did better on the road than at USCF. Edited April 20, 2012 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cali Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 So we can just all agree Gavin is never gonna be consistent enough to be a great pitcher. His 2008 was obviously an aberration.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 QUOTE (Cali @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 09:13 PM) So we can just all agree Gavin is never gonna be consistent enough to be a great pitcher. His 2008 was obviously an aberration.. Who thinks Gavin is great? Or that he could be great? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cali Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 06:21 PM) Who thinks Gavin is great? Or that he could be great? I'm not saying like Verlnader numbers, but when people were talking about the Sox rotation they only mentioned issues with Peavy Sale and Humber. Seemingly ignoring the issues Gavin has with consistency (and for that matter Danks) Both Guys headlining the rotation CAN be good, but they can't seem to put together more than a handful of great starts in a season and wind up with very average numbers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 For most teams, Danks is a 2 and Floyd is a 3/4. They're never going to "lead" us to a playoff run without the other components to go really go on a run, namely Sale and Peavy, but mostly Sale going forward. They also need Molina to provide the statistical replacement value of a 3/4 starter, if not better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 QUOTE (Jose Paniagua @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 05:35 PM) What you and your "reasoned logic" have to understand is this board has several "old school" individuals that are so Chicago tough, so Clint Eastwood-like, that their fire and passion doesn't allow for common sense crap like that. These guys are rough and tumble, take no quarter, and still make the world go around from their rocking chairs. Not one percenters, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 QUOTE (Cali @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 09:24 PM) I'm not saying like Verlnader numbers, but when people were talking about the Sox rotation they only mentioned issues with Peavy Sale and Humber. Seemingly ignoring the issues Gavin has with consistency (and for that matter Danks) Both Guys headlining the rotation CAN be good, but they can't seem to put together more than a handful of great starts in a season and wind up with very average numbers... Probably two of the most under looked reasons for the Sox lack of success since '05 is that Danks and Floyd have been solid performers and nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 19, 2012 -> 10:25 PM) Probably two of the most under looked reasons for the Sox lack of success since '05 is that Danks and Floyd have been solid performers and nothing more. Or that the one true ace in Contreras fell apart. That and trading Hudson and Gonzalez with little or nothing to show for it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Apr 20, 2012 -> 01:28 AM) Damn us for losing to the AL East leading Orioles. Calm down everyone. Wait till May to meltdown. Posts like this confuse me. The White Sox have sucked for two-plus seasons now. Many of us would rather NOT give the team the benefit of the doubt and wait for them to show us things may have changed. Losing 3 of 4 at home to Baltimore is ridiculous. Our hitting sucks. Yes many of us are not completely jumping off the ledge cause play vs. the Central Div. has been good. Everything else has sucked. Edited April 20, 2012 by greg775 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts