Jump to content

Closing Time


Marty34

Closer Attpempt #2  

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should be given the next chance to close?

    • Jones
      3
    • Crain
      1
    • Thornton
      6
    • Stewart
      0
    • Ohman
      2
    • Reed
      49
    • No One - Santiago will be fine
      6
    • Someone from the minors ( specify who in your post )
      0
    • KW Trade ( speculate who in your post )
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think I'd go with Thornton, followed by Crain.

These newcomers can't close. They are going to blow WAY too many.

Let the veterans do it until they prove they also can't.

 

When you are a .500ish type team, you can't have these closing problems. Just can't. It's hard enough to get in position to win games.

Poor Robin. The unreliable bullpen continues.

 

But in answer to your question. I'd go thornton, then crain after Thornton proves he can't.

I wouldn't be upset if it were Crain, then Thornton though.

 

GIVE IT TO A VETERAN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say Crain. Let Reed keep doing what he's doing. I'd rather not put any more pressure on him than we have to.

 

Thornton-Reed as set-up men.

 

Nate Jones as our next most reliable (the guy has gone 8 innings without allowing a run).

 

Loogie1 and Loogie2 as our lefty specialists.

 

Stewart as our long reliever/garbage man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (greg775 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 07:43 PM)
I think I'd go with Thornton, followed by Crain.

These newcomers can't close. They are going to blow WAY too many.

Let the veterans do it until they prove they also can't.

 

When you are a .500ish type team, you can't have these closing problems. Just can't. It's hard enough to get in position to win games.

Poor Robin. The unreliable bullpen continues.

 

But in answer to your question. I'd go thornton, then crain after Thornton proves he can't.

I wouldn't be upset if it were Crain, then Thornton though.

 

GIVE IT TO A VETERAN!

 

So like in 2005 they should of gave it to someone else besides Jenks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsideirish71 @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 12:51 AM)
So like in 2005 they should of gave it to someone else besides Jenks.

 

I loved Jenks.

These young guys now are too unreliable IMO.

You agree a change must be made NOW don't you?

Why not have Crain and Thornton try? This team has enough veteran talent the Sox should try to stay in the race as long as possible.

Giving away games with young closers is a recipe for disaster with this club IMO.

Today's loss was ridiculous; it's closer by committee time with Thornton/Crain the guys I want.

Edited by greg775
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (winninguglyin83 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 07:12 PM)
Reed.

 

that's four bombs Santiago has given up in 6 1/3 innings.

 

He's blown two two-run leads.

 

time to spot him to build his confidence back.

 

Reed has better stuff -- and better results.

 

make the move Robin.

 

and while you're at, sit Morel.

 

But sit Morel for who?

 

Lillibridge? Escobar? Kuhn? McPherson?

 

 

This will get Balta all riled up, again.

 

None of those guys are long-term solutions at the hot corner, either.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've liked pretty much everything Ventura has done, but in the admittedly small sample size I've seen of Santiago, he just doesn't have the makeup of a closer. That fastball is pretty straight and that screwball is very, very hittable. This situation is comparable to putting Boone Logan in the closer's role out of Spring Training in 2007. The kid has talent, but it's not as a closer and it's definitely not right now.

 

I like his makeup and the fact that he's not afraid to go right at hitters, but if you are coming with a straight 94 over the middle, they're gonna hit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 08:14 PM)
But sit Morel for who?

 

Lillibridge? Escobar? Kuhn? McPherson?

 

 

This will get Balta all riled up, again.

 

None of those guys are long-term solutions at the hot corner, either.

 

I'm so sick of the word "long-term solution". The long-term solution isn't on the roster. It isn't down on the farm...just put the least amount of suck at third base so the Sox have a shot to win some ballgames. That's it.

Edited by jeffro2525
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the funny thing is that at least 3 of those hits in that inning were on screwballs or offspeed pitches.

 

That stupid ball by Reddick drops and the whole inning falls apart.

 

Otherwise, it's a solo homer and we've won the game but still lingering questions about Santiago's homers surrendered count.

 

 

After all this craziness, somehow we'll still be heading home in a tie for first place...but 11-7 would have been much nicer after the way the trip started out. (So we go 1-2 to 5-2, then lose 4/5, win 4 in row and lose 2 consecutively). At least we're proving to be consistent in putting together streaks. If we lose tmrw, Peavy will get to stop a losing streak for the fourth time this season and keep us over .500 yet again.

 

That is, if the Royals don't blow another game. They had a 4-0 lead in CLE and the Indians had a chance to tie it at 4-4 in the bottom of the 7th but they stranded the tying runners at 2nd and 3rd.

 

Still two more innings for the Royals' losing streak to continue, though.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (greg775 @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 09:23 PM)
I used to throw a screwball.

It was neat to see it curve the other way.

It is hittable, though.

 

I have no idea how anyone can throw an effective screwball. Would take some unbelievable pronating ability that I don't have. Nonetheless, I've seen it look pretty filthy from Santiago. Wasn't there today at all though. I think he would have been okay if he would have relied on his 93-95 fastball though, and he has other pitches. Can't keep getting hurt on the pitch that isn't working.

 

That said, he's going to get the next save opportunity. If it is another disaster, I believe you will see Reed and I believe Reed deserves the next shot. If Santiago is removed from the closer role, I want him starting in AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Apr 25, 2012 -> 08:18 PM)
I've liked pretty much everything Ventura has done, but in the admittedly small sample size I've seen of Santiago, he just doesn't have the makeup of a closer. That fastball is pretty straight and that screwball is very, very hittable. This situation is comparable to putting Boone Logan in the closer's role out of Spring Training in 2007. The kid has talent, but it's not as a closer and it's definitely not right now.

 

I like his makeup and the fact that he's not afraid to go right at hitters, but if you are coming with a straight 94 over the middle, they're gonna hit it.

 

+1

To put Santiago in this situation is having mixed results at best. Yes Hector has four saves, but an ERA over 8 now. He's never closed in his life.

Hector should be in AAA building up his arm for starters' innings.

 

Addison Reed's future is to close games. It may not be the right time yet to give him the nod, but it just inched closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 02:40 AM)
I have no idea how anyone can throw an effective screwball. Would take some unbelievable pronating ability that I don't have. Nonetheless, I've seen it look pretty filthy from Santiago. Wasn't there today at all though. I think he would have been okay if he would have relied on his 93-95 fastball though, and he has other pitches. Can't keep getting hurt on the pitch that isn't working.

 

That said, he's going to get the next save opportunity. If it is another disaster, I believe you will see Reed and I believe Reed deserves the next shot. If Santiago is removed from the closer role, I want him starting in AAA.

 

You are probably right. Today was a total screwup, though. If you can't hold a 2-run lead in a day game in Oakland in the 14th inning with no fans there, I don't think you can close any road games.

Maybe the home crowd will fire him up and get the screwball moving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 26, 2012 -> 04:30 AM)
So you blame that on KW or Ventura?

 

I would think it was a Robin/Coop decision. My thinking is Coop pretty much runs the pitching staff.

Certainly they had mega discussions in ST and no way Robin made the call w/out input from Coop. I don't know why, but I'm thinking it was not KW's call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...