Wedge Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:26 PM) Yeah, Q looked like he was done...hanging his ams over the railing. I don't like it. I also hate when the closer is called upon to his role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (Wedge @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:27 PM) I also hate when the closer is called upon to his role. Just because someone decided to create some silly role at some point in time doesn't mean you should take out a starter that is dominating and has only thrown 77 pitches. Should we never allow a SP to throw a complete game? Why change what is working beautifully? What if Reed comes in and doesn't have s*** today? Edited June 17, 2012 by iamshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Dont hit anything near Ethier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitoMB345 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 03:29 PM) Just because someone decided to create some silly role at some point in time doesn't mean you should take out a starter that is dominating and has only thrown 77 pitches. Should we never allow a SP to throw a complete game? Apparently, only if you are up by 4 or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Reed in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Danks was told by Dr. Yocum there's nothing wrong structurally, but apparently he's still going to seek a second opinion. Someone with the White Sox? Any more updates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wedge Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:29 PM) Why change what is working beautifully? What if Reed comes in and doesn't have s*** today? What if Q blew it in the ninth? Questions we'll never have answers for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:31 PM) Reed in Just not worth the risk, IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Reed is in. Let's get this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (Wedge @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:32 PM) What if Q blew it in the ninth? Questions we'll never have answers for. The difference is Q has dominated for 8 innings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Hudson a defensive replacement at 3rd. Weeeee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 78 pitches, 58 strikes. Orlando Hudson in the game at 3B? I guess RV thinks Hudson is actually better defensively than Lillibridge over there. Reed 8/8 in save opportunities so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Why a high fastball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 What a shocker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 (edited) Well, this decision is going to get second-guessed...and first guessed. Who called for yet another FB with 2 strikes? No slider? Edited June 17, 2012 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Just a good piece of hitting. Nice approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:35 PM) What a shocker. You should be in charge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Here comes the bunt. Wish Q would have stayed in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshPR Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 WTF? Why didn't he let Quintana finish? Hell of a job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (Cerbaho-WG @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:35 PM) Just a good piece of hitting. Nice approach. Yeah, but you probably don't face him if you leave Quintana in. Edited June 17, 2012 by iamshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:35 PM) You should be in charge You are the biggest second-guesser here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 Bunting is so stupid here. K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 05:36 PM) Yeah, but you probably don't face him if you leave Quintana in. Agreed. I'd rather have had Q face DeJesus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 About time to get this doucher out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 17, 2012 Share Posted June 17, 2012 QUOTE (Cerbaho-WG @ Jun 17, 2012 -> 11:38 PM) Bunting is so stupid here. K. Especially since you're not going to double up Gordon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts