Steve9347 Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:36 AM) Please no more Carcillo and Handzus. Carcillo is worthless and Handzus is just too slow. Bring back Stalberg. I'd be shocked if we didn't see Stalberg in the lineup tonight. The Hawks need his speed out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 20, 2013 -> 11:47 AM) I'd be shocked if we didn't see Stalberg in the lineup tonight. The Hawks need his speed out there. Looks likes Stalberg plays tonight. @TimSassone Handzus is playing tonight on second or fourth line. As for Carcillo he is the likely odd man out. #Blackhawks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ May 20, 2013 -> 12:37 PM) Looks likes Stalberg plays tonight. @TimSassone Handzus is playing tonight on second or fourth line. As for Carcillo he is the likely odd man out. #Blackhawks Any lineup without Carcillo is a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 QUOTE (GoSox05 @ May 20, 2013 -> 12:37 PM) Looks likes Stalberg plays tonight. @TimSassone Handzus is playing tonight on second or fourth line. As for Carcillo he is the likely odd man out. #Blackhawks I dont understand the fear to use younger players in spots. I thought Morin looked damn good in the games he was in, why not move sharp to the Center spot and throw in one of the younger guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Soooooo, any time Hawks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Anyone know what channel this game is on?? I can't find it on Dish network Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ May 20, 2013 -> 08:19 PM) Soooooo, any time Hawks Lets go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 So any of you hockey guys wanna give me a rundown on why this is happening? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilJester99 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Looks of the score I probably don't want to watch this game anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Kill me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 It's a shame that Toews and Saad were hurt and missed the playoffs. Oh, wait. Sorry. They've played in every game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Knuckles @ May 20, 2013 -> 08:58 PM) So any of you hockey guys wanna give me a rundown on why this is happening? The refs took away a perfectly fair game tying goal. That sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:12 PM) The refs took away a perfectly fair game tying goal. That sucks. The Shaw goal? Seriously, what is the rule there? Why was that interference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenryan Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Probably a make up call for the Kane goal. Even Olczyk dodged the question when Pierre asked him if it should have been penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Friend of Nordhagen @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:13 PM) The Shaw goal? Seriously, what is the rule there? Why was that interference? It wasn't. Howard wasn't even touched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:19 PM) It wasn't. Howard wasn't even touched. My thought, too. I thought maybe I didn't know the rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 21, 2013 Author Share Posted May 21, 2013 Well that sucked. When the Hawks turn to goon mode in the last minute of a game, that should tell you somethingl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 The game should of been 2-2 Hawks got screwed bigtime by the refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Next one a must win if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Knuckles @ May 20, 2013 -> 10:29 PM) Next one a must win if you ask me. Got to come back home 2-2 at worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (Knuckles @ May 20, 2013 -> 08:58 PM) So any of you hockey guys wanna give me a rundown on why this is happening? Saturday we got outplayed, badly. Much, much better game than Saturday...this game was pretty even...but still a loss. Still can't score on the power play (yes we're killing off theirs...doesn't mean you can't find one of your own). Seabrook has been awful. Torched on the first goal. Get the man OR the puck...gets neither. And for the love of God stop chasing hits below the f***ing circles in the offensive zone. 2nd goal, terrible clearing attempt by Rozsival. Hit 3 posts + bad call on the disallowed goal. Datsyuk and Zetterberg are the best players on the ice. Lot of prime scoring chances tonight...simply couldn't finish. Sharp, Hossa, etc. Sure they came back to tie it without a bad call, but IMO this game was lost with the first 2 goals, 30 seconds apart, on 2 awful defensive plays. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:08 PM) Kill me. Agreed. QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:19 PM) It wasn't. Howard wasn't even touched. Correct. I'm about as unbiased as they come on this stuff...that was the wrong call. Problem is, it's a judgment call, not reviewable (but likely should be, there's not really a good reason it can't be, wish they'd change the rule at some point), so it stands. Howard wasn't impeded and there was barely any contact. Also, just to clarify, it doesn't have to be ruled a penalty for it to wave off the goal. QUOTE (Knuckles @ May 20, 2013 -> 10:29 PM) Next one a must win if you ask me. Yup. See ya Thursday. f***. Edited May 21, 2013 by IlliniKrush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IlliniKrush Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 QUOTE (Friend of Nordhagen @ May 20, 2013 -> 09:13 PM) The Shaw goal? Seriously, what is the rule there? Why was that interference? 69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper - This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgment of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review. ... If an attacking player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by a defending player so as to cause him to come into contact with the goalkeeper, such contact will not be deemed contact initiated by the attacking player for purposes of this rule, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Game 4 is a MUST WIN game, and I will miss all of it because of damn softball (crossing fingers for heavy rain). Then Game 5 I will probably miss while sitting passenger seat in my grandmas car coming back from a family event in Michigan. Already missed games 1 and 2 of this series because of work/family things. These playoffs suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 What is going on? I thought the Hawks by and far were the most talented team. Suddenly next game is HUGE. A loss and you'd have to think the dream is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Babcock is definitely outcoaching Q so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts