Jump to content

KW whining about (OK bringing up) attendance again


chisoxfan09

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:12 PM)
I don't need evidence, Dick.

 

All I stated was that one cannot use our rumored interest in Soler as evidence that we have money to spend on player acquisitions for this year.

 

That does not require evidence.

As I said either Gammons or KW was lying. Maybe you have evidence the Sox didn't make Soler the offer Gammons claimed. If the Sox had money for Soler, they have money to pick someone up. They only have to pay them for half a season. Soler would require some sort of bonus and salary this season, so your future payroll argument is moot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 515
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:11 PM)
You have a very low threshold of proof, my friend.

 

Yeah I dont trust those sports writers like Peter Gammons who has been doing this for most of his life and has sources all around Major League Baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 09:14 PM)
As I said either Gammons or KW was lying. Maybe you have evidence the Sox didn't make Soler the offer Gammons claimed. If the Sox had money for Soler, they have money to pick someone up. They only have to pay them for half a season. Soler would require some sort of bonus and salary this season, so your future payroll argument is moot.

You're making an affirmative statement which requires an assumption to be made if it is to be considered valid.

 

I'm pointing out that there is no information available to us today which allows us to make that assumption, and thus, your affirmative statement is invalid.

 

Do you understand the distinction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 09:16 PM)
This is what he does when he is out of bullets. I think he's starting to realize his ridiculousness.

No, it's what I do when I realize the audience I am debating with is incapable of understanding the argument I am making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:16 PM)
You're making an affirmative statement which requires an assumption to be made if it is to be considered valid.

 

I'm pointing out that there is no information available to us today which allows us to make that assumption, and thus, your affirmative statement is invalid.

 

Do you understand the distinction?

What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP. The word IF is big there.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 09:18 PM)
What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP.

That the White Sox have money to spend right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:18 PM)
What affirmative statement. I mentioned Gammons report. I said one of them is lying. I didn't say which one. I did say if Gammons was accurate, KW's crying poor is, once again, BS like it was before Peavy, Rios, Jackson and Ramirez, and for that matter Dunn, Konerko and AJP.

 

I have no idea why anyone would listen to Kenny crying poor. I remember this right before we acquired Peavy. I bet he was laughing his *** off that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:19 PM)
Well if I had known you had his number this whole time I would have asked you to call him a long time ago!

 

You understand real life better than me though. Maybe you should try to give Kenny a lesson since your so knowledgeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 09:20 PM)
You understand real life better than me though. Maybe you should try to give Kenny a lesson since your so knowledgeable.

No, I am the Kenny supporter...DA will remind you of that when you sober up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:19 PM)
That the White Sox have money to spend right now.

Learn how to read. Here's my original post you started arguing.

 

 

Isn't it a little strange KW rmentioned the attendance perhaps hurting his ability to add to the current roster only days after Peter Gammons reported the Sox offered Soler $25-30 million? Either Gammons is lying or KW is lying about being strapped for cash.

 

I really have no idea how it got you so riled up, but its hard to argue it isn't accurate.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:22 PM)
Learn how to read. Here's my original post you started arguing.

 

 

Isn't it a little strange KW rmentioned the attendance perhaps hurting his ability to add to the current roster only days after Peter Gammons reported the Sox offered Soler $25-30 million? Either Gammons is lying or KW is lying about being strapped for cash.

Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:23 PM)
Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

 

That was his original post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jun 21, 2012 -> 10:23 PM)
Throughout the thread you've stated several times, in perhaps every way possible, that the White Sox have money to spend right now.

 

Are you honestly trying to amend that now to be a conditional statement?

That was my orignal post at 8:09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...