Steve9347 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Share Posted January 15, 2013 48-20 end half. Bulls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 02:08 AM) Hawks scored five points in the second quarter. Dear lord. Is that an alltime NBA low since the shot clock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 08:10 PM) Is that an alltime NBA low since the shot clock? Bulls franchise record, not sure about alltime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 08:07 PM) The Bulls gave up five points in the second quarter. Usually I am willing to give the Bulls D some props when it is due, but Atlanta sucking was a large part of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Took the Bulls on -4 and under 185 parlay, looking prettyyyyy good right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 NBA TV said the Hawks had the statistically worst half of NBA basketball of ALL TIME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 (edited) All time low in the shot clock era is 49...by your Chicago Bulls. Edited January 15, 2013 by Rowand44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 DEAR LORD TAJ GIBSON. THAT WAS NASTY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 f***ING NAZR MOHAMMED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHarris1 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Kirk Hinrich with his second consecutive 1 point outing!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEdWalsh Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Mike Scott lead the Hawks with a whopping 10 pts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 08:46 PM) All time low in the shot clock era is 49...by your Chicago Bulls. Kornel David was your leading scorer that night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEdWalsh Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 08:56 PM) Kornel David was your leading scorer that night. Bulls' shooting pct. that night was SICK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 K.C Johnson @KCJHoop Bulls 59 rebounds. Hawks 58 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 09:56 PM) Kornel David was your leading scorer that night. Ahh the good ol' days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 08:09 AM) Ahh the good ol' days. Yes, the "rebuilding" days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 09:15 AM) Yes, the "rebuilding" days. If it worked for the Bulls, why not the White Sox! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 08:24 AM) If it worked for the Bulls, why not the White Sox! It only took them 7 years to get back to the playoffs, Sox fans will stick around for that, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 09:07 PM) DEAR LORD TAJ GIBSON. THAT WAS NASTY Yeah, his dunk last night was a thing of beauty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (BigEdWalsh @ Jan 14, 2013 -> 10:47 PM) Bulls' shooting pct. that night was SICK. That was a rough season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 08:26 AM) It only took them 7 years to get back to the playoffs, Sox fans will stick around for that, right? 7 years and lucking into a superstar with the #1 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 The Bulls thoroughly tested how much you're allowed to f*** your fans over after winning 6 titles. You don't have to win 6 more titles, but you shouldn't try to match the amount of titles with the amount of times you finish with the league's worst record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan99 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 11:42 AM) That was a rough season. It is actually crazy that that team won 13 games in a shortened season. What an absolutely atrocious roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 15, 2013 Author Share Posted January 15, 2013 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jan 15, 2013 -> 10:45 AM) 7 years and lucking into a superstar with the #1 pick. They were making the playoffs well before Derrick Rose was drafted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 15, 2013 Share Posted January 15, 2013 Bulls fans couldnt have had two more extremes from the championships to post-championship era. It was truly the highest of highs and lowest of lows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts