Jump to content

2012-2013 NBA thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 6, 2013 -> 07:58 PM)
Kings officially have filed to move to Seattle with the league.

 

And now another storied franchise hangs in limbo.

 

My guess is in the next 10 years, Kansas City and Sacramento will get teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 6, 2013 -> 08:57 PM)
And now another storied franchise hangs in limbo.

 

My guess is in the next 10 years, Kansas City and Sacramento will get teams.

 

I don't know, KC and Sacramento don't seem to be all that great of locations for NBA teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 6, 2013 -> 08:57 PM)
And now another storied franchise hangs in limbo.

 

My guess is in the next 10 years, Kansas City and Sacramento will get teams.

 

Yeah I don't feel like people care much about Sacramento to try very hard to bring a team back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (GoodAsGould @ Feb 6, 2013 -> 09:30 PM)
Yeah I don't feel like people care much about Sacramento to try very hard to bring a team back there.

 

I concur. They've only been in Sacramento since '86 and even with a few solid years they still only have a .432 winning percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Feb 7, 2013 -> 05:20 PM)
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8927362/...wap-sources-say

 

Bulls are looking to trade Boozer for Bargnani.

 

Both suck on defense, both aren't really inside players. I don't know...

 

Bargnani would balance out the team better than Boozer on offense. They need more of an outside threat, plus it allows the pick and roll to run from further out and space the floor better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Feb 7, 2013 -> 05:20 PM)
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8927362/...wap-sources-say

 

Bulls are looking to trade Boozer for Bargnani.

 

Both suck on defense, both aren't really inside players. I don't know...

If you trade for Bargnani, I don't think you can amnesty him. Something to consider given our future financial obligations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 7, 2013 -> 05:41 PM)
Bargnani would balance out the team better than Boozer on offense. They need more of an outside threat, plus it allows the pick and roll to run from further out and space the floor better.

 

All good points, but Bargnani's been awful this year and he's never been a very efficient shooter. He takes more deep 2s than 3s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Feb 7, 2013 -> 05:57 PM)
I'd be terrified for our big man depth after a trade like that.

 

It's already pretty thin as it is. Bargnani can't rebound for s***, he's worse than Brook Lopez in that category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Feb 7, 2013 -> 06:57 PM)
It's already pretty thin as it is. Bargnani can't rebound for s***, he's worse than Brook Lopez in that category.

I don't want to be the one doing the response, but I'll do it.

 

Thibs.

 

The salaries don't match as-is, the Bulls would need to take on another $2.4 million from the Raptors to make it work, but I'm at the point where if Thibs says he can work with a guy, I won't ask questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...