sunofgold Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 10:57 PM) What a selfish bastard. 9 months ago he should have realized he would be needed in the middle of a pennant race, should have wrapped it up. Ironically this happened to Ventura in 1993. His wife gave birth on oct 7 1993. I remember an interview on tv with RV And he said that is was bad planning. You have to calculate the 9 months and figure out when the child is due. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Side Fireworks Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (JPN366 @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 10:53 PM) Two plate appearances. He was replaced on defense after one out during the 5th inning. Thanks. I would suspect he's heading up to take Tyler's spot during his paternity leave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (sunofgold @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 11:16 PM) Ironically this happened to Ventura in 1993. His wife gave birth on oct 7 1993. I remember an interview on tv with RV And he said that is was bad planning. You have to calculate the 9 months and figure out when the child is due. October 7th might be the best day to be born, EVAR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunofgold Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 11:18 PM) October 7th might be the best day to be born, EVAR. I don't know. Might be disturbing somebody postseason baseball. Why don't they want Dylan to be on a potential postseason roster? They should just keep him and then add players on the 1st Edited August 30, 2012 by sunofgold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (sunofgold @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 11:20 PM) I don't know. Might be disturbing somebody postseason baseball. Why don't they want Dylan to be on a potential postseason roster? They should just keep him and then add players on the 1st You don't need a 5th starter with no talent on the playoff roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunofgold Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (Jake @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 11:32 PM) You don't need a 5th starter with no talent on the playoff roster You forgot to put that in green. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (sunofgold @ Aug 29, 2012 -> 11:37 PM) You forgot to put that in green. But really -- he's your 5th starter (a role that doesn't exist in the playoffs) and his stuff doesn't translate to the pen. No need for him. Phil Humber can be our long reliever/mop up guy along with Hector, Donnie Veal, or whomever else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Gimenez is a VERY good defensive catcher...another version of Corky Miller. Offensively, MEEHHHHHHHHH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 So, Trib says it is Lopez coming up. Which gives the Sox 3 backup IF's, and with Flowers down, no backup C. That just doesn't seem right. Why have Olmedo, Hudson AND Lopez? Some is going to get pushed off the 40 man roster in any case, to make room for a 3rd catcher for September, if not today. Seems to me they can designate Olmedo and he will likely clear waivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoSox2k2 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 08:46 AM) So, Trib says it is Lopez coming up. Which gives the Sox 3 backup IF's, and with Flowers down, no backup C. That just doesn't seem right. Why have Olmedo, Hudson AND Lopez? Some is going to get pushed off the 40 man roster in any case, to make room for a 3rd catcher for September, if not today. Seems to me they can designate Olmedo and he will likely clear waivers. Lopez does seem to make sense, as ive felt all along he would be the guy on the playoff roster over Olmedo. However, I thought we may be calling up dan johnson so he could be eligible for the playoffs, as it would be nice having his left handed bat off the bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoSox2k2 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 08:46 AM) So, Trib says it is Lopez coming up. Which gives the Sox 3 backup IF's, and with Flowers down, no backup C. That just doesn't seem right. Why have Olmedo, Hudson AND Lopez? Some is going to get pushed off the 40 man roster in any case, to make room for a 3rd catcher for September, if not today. Seems to me they can designate Olmedo and he will likely clear waivers. will lopez be starting at 3rd today, giving youk a day off with a Lefty on the mound in Britton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 08:46 AM) So, Trib says it is Lopez coming up. Which gives the Sox 3 backup IF's, and with Flowers down, no backup C. That just doesn't seem right. Why have Olmedo, Hudson AND Lopez? Some is going to get pushed off the 40 man roster in any case, to make room for a 3rd catcher for September, if not today. Seems to me they can designate Olmedo and he will likely clear waivers. Gimenez is coming up to cover Flowers paternity leave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 08:57 AM) Gimenez is coming up to cover Flowers paternity leave. Official? Also, he's not on the 40, I don't think. So still have to move someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 09:23 AM) Official? Also, he's not on the 40, I don't think. So still have to move someone. Neither is Lopez. We know Bruney to 60 day DL is probably one of them. The second is much more interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoSox2k2 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 09:24 AM) Neither is Lopez. We know Bruney to 60 day DL is probably one of them. The second is much more interesting. have we added danks to the 60 day DL yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoGoSox2k2 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 09:24 AM) Neither is Lopez. We know Bruney to 60 day DL is probably one of them. The second is much more interesting. would not be surprised to see Olemdo DFA with Hudson likely coming back once Sept 1 hits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 have we added danks to the 60 day DL yet? Yes, that's been done already. If the Sox are calling up Lopez AND Phegley, somebody will have to get DFA'd. My money is on Hudson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 09:34 AM) Yes, that's been done already. If the Sox are calling up Lopez AND Phegley, somebody will have to get DFA'd. My money is on Hudson. Not Phegley, Gimenez from the sounds of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 09:44 AM) Not Phegley, Gimenez from the sounds of it. Yup. Gonzales tweeted that Gimenez is listed on today's lineup card as a reserve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Dan Hayes @DanHayesCSN Gregory Infante was released by #WhiteSox to make room on the 40-man roster for Lopez and Gimenez. Also, Brian Bruney placed on 60-day DL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 10:12 AM) Dan Hayes @DanHayesCSN Gregory Infante was released by #WhiteSox to make room on the 40-man roster for Lopez and Gimenez. Also, Brian Bruney placed on 60-day DL. Makes sense. Infante was the odd man out in the bullpen stack this year, and he kind of dropped off the past couple years performance-wise. A little surprised its Gimenez over Phegley though, unless they want to avoid starting Phegley's clock, since it isn't 9/1 yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjm676 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 So I guess Axelrod comes back. Activate DeAza, Hudson, Septimo, Floyd and Flowers. There's your roster for expanded rosters. Maybe Morel and another pitcher (Omogrosso, Marinez) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 So if Axe is sent back down, Humber/Santiago makes Floyd's next start? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjm676 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 30, 2012 -> 10:55 AM) So if Axe is sent back down, Humber/Santiago makes Floyd's next start? I read that he'll be back on Monday, after rosters expand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Lopez will be a better option than Olmedo. Although Olmedos defense is pretty damn good. Lopez is the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.