Dick Allen Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 (edited) Reed is a rookie. Rookies usually struggle. At the beginning of the year, the re-build crowd wanted Reed closing and were actually up in arms when he wasn't. Now that same crowd has already turned on the Sox #2 prospect. I think all the "rebuilders" should consider ever endorse a total rebuild ever again. You simply do not have the patience for it if you give up on prospects after less than a season. Here are some rookie stats a surefire HOFer put up when he was 25. I realize it's apples and oranges as a lot of these numbers were put up as a starter not the reliever he became, but certainly if he was a White Sox prospect putting up these numbers, he would be deemed to be worthless. I'm also not saying Reed will have nearly the success of this guy. All I'm saying is rookies and young players struggle. Sometimes you have to be patient. Here's Mariano Riviera's rookie numbers: 5.51 ERA in 67 innings with 51 k's and 30 walks. Edited September 9, 2012 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 BUMP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeynach Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) Reed and Jones both struggle way too much with command of their FB's to be effective closers at this point in their careers. Reed has better secondary pitches in his slider and straight change, can at least get some swings and misses there, and thats why he is closing. Nate Jones would be an awful closing candidate. Yes his FB is high 90s, but he falls behind a lot and is forced to throw his straight as an arrow FB for strikes too often. I get really upset when RV brings in Jones in need a strikeout/ground ball DP to get out of this situations. Jones often falls behind and has the hitters waiting for his FB on a tee, typically resulting in hard hit balls, the exact opposite of what is needed there. Its quite frustrating cuz duh 98 mph fastballs when contract is made get hit hard somewhere. Anyway, in my time watching them both pitch this year Reed is the lesser of the two evils as I think Jones is more hittable. I dont care about velocity, big league hitters can handle 97 if they know its coming and its straight. Both have serious problems with walks and falling behind in counts, neither inspire confidence in high leverage closing situations, but at this point what else can we do? Myers I guess, he can at least command his pitches, but his stuff is average for a reliever at best...lets alone a closer. Edited September 16, 2012 by joeynach Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 It would be hilarious if we came full-circle and ended up with Hector again... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyons Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 There are 18 games left. Is the vesting of Myers option still a viable concern? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Sep 8, 2012 -> 04:19 PM) Dude is the worst closer in baseball. Get him the hell out of here. QUOTE (MAX @ Sep 8, 2012 -> 10:31 PM) You showed me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2nd_city_saint787 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Reeds def in the bottom 5 among closers as much as it pains me to say that. Ahead of the likes of Frank Fransisco, Heath Bell and maybe John Axford. He's a rookie though, he'll get better in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Sep 15, 2012 -> 10:06 PM) There are 18 games left. Is the vesting of Myers option still a viable concern? Who gives a s***. I would take a division title & Myers at $10mil in 2013 over none of the above. It's really hard to trust Reed right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max power Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Sep 15, 2012 -> 10:10 PM) You showed me! I thought you were making a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnCangelosi Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 15, 2012 -> 11:22 PM) Who gives a s***. I would take a division title & Myers at $10mil in 2013 over none of the above. It's really hard to trust Reed right now. No way that happens, however. I just wish we didn't use him to finish games that were well out of reach early on. From a fiscal standpoint there is no way you can justify 10% of your salary on Brett Myers in 2013. Period. Plus there's no convincing me he's any better than Crain could be in the role anyhow. I'd be shocked if he reaches the number this year, which, by the way, what are the current numbers? He needs another 5 finishes or so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Sep 16, 2012 -> 03:26 AM) No way that happens, however. I just wish we didn't use him to finish games that were well out of reach early on. From a fiscal standpoint there is no way you can justify 10% of your salary on Brett Myers in 2013. Period. Plus there's no convincing me he's any better than Crain could be in the role anyhow. I'd be shocked if he reaches the number this year, which, by the way, what are the current numbers? He needs another 5 finishes or so? According to Fathom, it was 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (iamshack @ Sep 15, 2012 -> 08:43 PM) It would be hilarious if we came full-circle and ended up with Hector again... TRAUTMAN: When are you gonna come full circle? RAMBO: What are you talking about? TRAUTMAN You said that your war is over. Well, maybe the one out there is, but not the one inside you. I think I know the reason that you're here John, but it doesn't work that way. You may try, but you can't get away from what you really are. RAMBO: And what do you think I am? TRAUTMAN: A full-blooded combat soldier. RAMBO: Not anymore. I don't want it. TRAUTMAN: That's too bad, 'cause you're stuck with it. Let me tell you a story, John. There was a sculptor NAMED DON COOPER, and he found this stone: a special stone. He dragged it home and he worked on it for months, until he finally finished. When he was ready, he showed it to everyone on the coaching staff and they said he had created a great statue, and the sculptor said he hadn't created anything. The statue was always there. He just cleared away the small pieces. We didn't make Hector Santiago into this CLOSING machine. We just chipped away the rough edges. You're always going to be tearing away at yourself until you come to terms with what you are. Until you come full circle. RAMBO: I guess I'm not ready yet. TRAUTMAN: Well . . . I gotta move. Promise me you'll look me up when you get stateside. RAMBO: Colonel, I'm sorry, but it's gotta end for me sometime. TRAUTMAN: I understand . . . Edited September 16, 2012 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Just win the games. The White Sox can worry about how much money they have. Any word on how much cash we got from Houston? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 QUOTE (kitekrazy @ Sep 9, 2012 -> 05:29 AM) I'd take Reed in the 9th over Thornton any day. Matt bailed out Reed on Saturday 9-15-12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 Reed is dead. He's been crushed the past month or so. That said, it was a solid rookie campaign and he should get better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted September 16, 2012 Share Posted September 16, 2012 I think that Baddison Reed nickname has a real chance to stick if he were to somehow blow a save tomorrow against the Tigers in the dreaded "most important game of the season." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunofgold Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Why is Addison Reed the closer? Because Robin Ventura has reinvented the closer role. You only have to get one out, the last one. Thus the closer only has to focus on one batter Genius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 QUOTE (sunofgold @ Sep 17, 2012 -> 08:52 PM) Why is Addison Reed the closer? Because Robin Ventura has reinvented the closer role. You only have to get one out, the last one. Thus the closer only has to focus on one batter Genius Keeps Myers from ending another game... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lillian Posted September 18, 2012 Author Share Posted September 18, 2012 (edited) For those of you who don't think that Nate Jones is a viable option to close, all I can say is I don't know what games your watching. He looks very dominant to me. I'd rather see him face 3 batters in the 9TH. The difference is that he has gotten better as the season has progressed, while Reed has gotten worse. Moreover, he has thrown 10 more innings than Reed, so he has demonstrated more stamina and durability. While he had a couple of appearances where he failed to retire the two batters he faced, he nevertheless has not given up a run in 15 consecutive appearances. Edited September 18, 2012 by Lillian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunofgold Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 QUOTE (Lillian @ Sep 17, 2012 -> 10:07 PM) For those of you who don't think that Nate Jones is a viable option to close, all I can say is I don't know what games your watching. He looks very dominant to me. I'd rather see him face 3 batters in the 9TH. The difference is that he has gotten better as the season has progressed, while Reed has gotten worse. Moreover, he has thrown 10 more innings than Reed, so he has demonstrated more stamina and durability. While he had a couple of appearances where he failed to retire the two batters he faced, he nevertheless has not given up a run in 15 consecutive appearances. Not this year and that is all I care about right now. He is doing great as a middle Reliever and picking up wins I think at this point Reed is still the closer, but RV will go By situation. It was a great move to get him out of the game in Minnesota when he just didn't have it And it was a great move to have him just get one out today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnCangelosi Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 QUOTE (sunofgold @ Sep 17, 2012 -> 09:20 PM) Not this year and that is all I care about right now. He is doing great as a middle Reliever and picking up wins I think at this point Reed is still the closer, but RV will go By situation. It was a great move to get him out of the game in Minnesota when he just didn't have it And it was a great move to have him just get one out today. That said, he threw a roller or two up there against Jackson, very hittable pitches that you never want seen thrown in a one run game. If Jackson wasn't banged up a little, you gotta wonder if he would've made it a 5-5 game. At least he attacked the strike zone though- but that rolling slider he threw to Jackson yesterday is bound to go a long way more times than not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 (edited) QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Sep 18, 2012 -> 03:38 AM) That said, he threw a roller or two up there against Jackson, very hittable pitches that you never want seen thrown in a one run game. If Jackson wasn't banged up a little, you gotta wonder if he would've made it a 5-5 game. At least he attacked the strike zone though- but that rolling slider he threw to Jackson yesterday is bound to go a long way more times than not. I thought those 0-2 pitches were brutal. Right in the middle of the zone. At least throw one pitch down and away, hope he goes fishing for it. It worked out in the end of course. Edited September 18, 2012 by LittleHurt05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Sep 18, 2012 -> 03:38 AM) That said, he threw a roller or two up there against Jackson, very hittable pitches that you never want seen thrown in a one run game. If Jackson wasn't banged up a little, you gotta wonder if he would've made it a 5-5 game. At least he attacked the strike zone though- but that rolling slider he threw to Jackson yesterday is bound to go a long way more times than not. That was the pitch that Cain destroyed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Reed has to start his slider on the outside portion and let it cut out of the zone, hoping guys swing and flail. When he tries inside, it always ends up hanging and down the middle. Like others say, he is a rookie and learning while on a winning team. Gonna be some bumps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.