Jump to content

2012-2013 MLB off season tracker thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Soxfest @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 08:54 AM)
Cubs keep spending money on starters................thought they would wait 1 more year to start spending again.

Its going to be a complete waste of money. By all means they should completely tank this season if they were smart, however they are signing middling players which will pull them up out of the basement to the mediocre level of teams which will almost guarantee missing out on a real impact prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 12:13 PM)
Its going to be a complete waste of money. By all means they should completely tank this season if they were smart, however they are signing middling players which will pull them up out of the basement to the mediocre level of teams which will almost guarantee missing out on a real impact prospect.

Cubs signed EJax for 4 years, $52 mil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 12:13 PM)
Its going to be a complete waste of money. By all means they should completely tank this season if they were smart, however they are signing middling players which will pull them up out of the basement to the mediocre level of teams which will almost guarantee missing out on a real impact prospect.

I think they saw decreasing attendance want to put on a good show of trying. I don't know the FO personally but from what people say about them, they think they are smarter than all the other teams and will find the best prospects regardless of drafting position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (smalls2598 @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 02:39 PM)
Cubs signed EJax for 4 years, $52 mil

 

 

Considering the current pitching market, that's not an awful deal for him. But it would look a lot better if the Cubs had some good young, cheap arms surrounding him in the rotation (like the Nats), which they obviously don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 03:04 PM)
Considering the current pitching market, that's not an awful deal for him. But it would look a lot better if the Cubs had some good young, cheap arms surrounding him in the rotation (like the Nats), which they obviously don't.

 

That really isn't a bad deal at all. Jackson can be inconsistent, but he will go take the ball every single start. 30+ starts for six straight seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 03:12 PM)
There's no guarantee, but players are generally not traded 1 year into a 4 year deal

 

This is Edwin Jackson, the Cubs are currently negotiating with the Angels for a possible July trade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 02:58 PM)
He got an NTC in this deal.

Wow after Soriano NTC fiasco...............Theo said the Cubs would not give any more NTC out............Whoops!

Edited by Soxfest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Soxfest @ Dec 20, 2012 -> 03:54 PM)
Wow after Soriano NTC fiasco...............Theo said the Cubs would not give any more NTC out............Whoops!

 

Meet the new boss same as the old boss.

 

Edwin Jackson is an enigma that maybe the bright sunshine of day baseball can fix.

 

That is not a good deal.

 

The guy has been on 7 teams already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Dec 21, 2012 -> 08:36 AM)
Meet the new boss same as the old boss.

 

Edwin Jackson is an enigma that maybe the bright sunshine of day baseball can fix.

 

That is not a good deal.

 

The guy has been on 7 teams already.

And still got a 4 year deal, dude has value to a lot of teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Dec 21, 2012 -> 09:41 AM)
And still got a 4 year deal, dude has value to a lot of teams.

He clearly has value. IMO, his greatest value is to a team that is close to competing but is iffy on starting pitching depth...such that he can eat a good number of innings, give average performance in those innings, give his team a chance to win, and take some pressure off of the rest of the rotation and the bullpen.

 

The Cubs aren't in that boat. In fact, it's entirely possible that by paying fair market value for a pitcher who does what Jackson does, they're hurting their long term plan. Jackson will probably still eat innings next year...those are innings that could have been given either to developing young pitcher(s) or to finding pitchers on the scrap heap who might be able to turn careers around. And that's on top of hurting their draft stock by winning a hadnful more games.

 

If they're already in a position where they don't have the talent to compete and they know that...then a deal like that for Jackson gets in the way of trying to find and develop cost controlled talent. Throw a Philip Humber out there, maybe he has an excellent first half and you can trade him for a couple minor leaguers at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...