JDsDirtySox Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Marmol for Haren is rumored to be a done deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 I don't understand this. Why would the Cubs want to add payroll, and get older at the same time? They aren't competing while Haren is under contract (2013). If they just wanted to dump Marmol, they should have cut payroll too. UNLESS this is all just to move Haren elsewhere either this offseason or in July. He has tons of success in the NL, so maybe they want to boost his stock, and trade him midseason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 I look at this the complete opposite away, this trade makes 0 sense for LAA imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Nov 2, 2012 -> 07:57 PM) I look at this the complete opposite away, this trade makes 0 sense for LAA imo Actually, now that I think about it, I forgot the Angels had an OPTION for Haren at $15M, but a buyout at like....$3M? So really, they just added $6M in payroll, and got a terrible reliever (unless someone can control his walk issue). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 I don't even know what to think of this trade. It's one team's garbage for another team's garbage...except one team's garbage has a guaranteed contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 This trade is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 #Cubs source says Marmol-for-Haren trade "not happening" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Nov 2, 2012 -> 09:27 PM) #Cubs source says Marmol-for-Haren trade "not happening" Indeed. http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/8584934/...deal-called-off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 It's the Dempster trade fiasco all over again. Good work Theo. Angels bought out Haren, he is now a free agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewokpelts Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 HAHAHAHAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Nov 3, 2012 -> 11:31 AM) It's the Dempster trade fiasco all over again. Good work Theo. Angels bought out Haren, he is now a free agent. I don't know why you'd ever trade with the Cubs now. That's two botched deals in the past 4 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts