Rowand44 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 12:39 PM) What, you don't think a 2nd year qb that is closer to 30 than 20 is going to be around for a long time? He actually turns 30 in less than a month, crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (scs787 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 12:37 PM) Thing I don't get is they were gonna be in the running for those 3 anyway, and they'd have TRich....Certainly a puzzling move to me. Cause they're really bad and rb's in todays nfl are not very important(there are obvious exceptions), load up on picks and rebuild, makes perfect sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 12:47 PM) Cause they're really bad and rb's in todays nfl are not very important(there are obvious exceptions), load up on picks and rebuild, makes perfect sense to me. And Richardson was picked by the old GM. Maybe the new GM doesn't view him as anything special and decided to get something back for him while he still had value. It all comes down to what they do with the Colts pick, if they don't screw it up as so many past Browns GMs have done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 01:33 PM) I actually dont like either of those RB's. Why isnt Sankey a franchise back? He's not small and he produces. But I also agree that '15 is deep, and that would be the class to grab a RB if you could, i'm assuming both Gordon and Gurley come out and I love both of those guys. For some reason I think Cle is set on getting yet another QB in '14. Sankey reminds me of Ingram. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (scs787 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 12:37 PM) I don't think that's even a question. Bridgewater if they're lucky, Boyd or Hundley are the "consultation" prizes. So do you have to consult someone or be consulted to get Boyd or Hundley? (I also think Manziel is going to be a good pro QB. I love him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 19, 2013 Author Share Posted September 19, 2013 ChiTribSports @ChiTribSports 1m Marshall leaves Bears practice with back tightness http://trib.in/1eVxNV9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 I think it's a horrible trade for the Colts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2nd_city_saint787 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 02:17 PM) So do you have to consult someone or be consulted to get Boyd or Hundley? (I also think Manziel is going to be a good pro QB. I love him) Yes, you must first with consult with several experts about making the decision between the 2, whereas Bridgewater is a no doubter. =p Really gotta do some consulting when it comes to Manziel though, that's a given. Edited September 19, 2013 by scs787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Martellus Bennett compares Marc Trestman to Willy Wonka: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown...41880--nfl.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 19, 2013 Author Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (knightni @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 03:41 PM) Martellus Bennett compares Marc Trestman to Willy Wonka: http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown...41880--nfl.html Veruca Cutler. Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 Highly recommend listening to that Jay Cutler show with Bennett. It was hilarious. I think it's still on ESPN.com/chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 12:15 PM) Serious Q: how good do people think Richardson is? Between him being banged up last year and the fact that he's on the Browns I didn't see or hear much about him. Obviously the Colts saw something they liked about him but does anyone have an impression of what the Colts just got and how impactful it will be? Its hard to tell, Richardson was solid for Bama, but when I watched him I never thought "special". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 19, 2013 Share Posted September 19, 2013 It just seems line Richardson has always been hurt. And he isn't an elusive scat back, he is a banger. Guys like that tend to knock themselves out of the league because they simply cannot stay healthy due to their style of play. That being said, I think he gives the Colts much better production than they were going to get, if he stays healthy of course. It isn't like Cleveland where opposing defenses are going for him and only him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 It's very odd to get rid of a guy after only two games, though. Something must have happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (knightni @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 07:49 PM) It's very odd to get rid of a guy after only two games, though. Something must have happened. Yeah, they suck and decided to clean house. Richardson is perfect for the Colts offense, Cleveland gets a second 1st round pick to go for a QB.. I thought it was a great trade for both teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 05:39 PM) Its hard to tell, Richardson was solid for Bama, but when I watched him I never thought "special". IMO Ingram always looked like just another guy, but Richardson seemed "special". 50/50 on those predictions so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Ingram- 295 rushes 1107 yards 10 TDs, 3.8 YPC, 1 fumble Richardson- 298 rushse 1055 yards 11 TDs, 3.5 YPC, 3 fumbles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 Jamaal Charles went HAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasox24 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 09:35 PM) Ingram- 295 rushes 1107 yards 10 TDs, 3.8 YPC, 1 fumble Richardson- 298 rushse 1055 yards 11 TDs, 3.5 YPC, 3 fumbles It's interesting to see the similarities statistically, but it only tells part of the story. Ingram plays in a much more prolific offense and has played a season longer. No teams stack the box against the Saints, whereas that's what Richardson faced every game. Also, Ingram doesn't catch the ball like Richardson does. Richardson is a true 3-down back. Add in T-Rich's receiving stats, and I think that tells much more. Richardson - 58 catches, 418 yards, 1 TD Ingram - 17 catches, 77 yards, 0 TD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxsoxsoxsox Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 04:44 PM) Highly recommend listening to that Jay Cutler show with Bennett. It was hilarious. I think it's still on ESPN.com/chicago here's the link http://espn.go.com/espnradio/chicago/play?id=9682700 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (chw42 @ Sep 19, 2013 -> 11:05 PM) Jamaal Charles went HAM. Chiefs have some talent on both sides of the ball. Now that they are finally healthy and they have a pro quarterback, watch out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 20, 2013 -> 07:33 AM) Chiefs have some talent on both sides of the ball. Now that they are finally healthy and they have a pro quarterback, watch out. It was fairly obvious watching the game last night which team had an NFL coach that has 10+ years of experience and which had a rookie head coach with a very explosive system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Sep 20, 2013 -> 08:53 AM) It was fairly obvious watching the game last night which team had an NFL coach that has 10+ years of experience and which had a rookie head coach with a very explosive system. Also, it was fairly obvious why everyone shouldn't freak out about one good week if it happens in week 1. Vick is still Vick. There's been only one season where he shed the turnover problems. That there's an outlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 During Barry Sanders’ 10-year career, he averaged 4.98 yards per carry, scored a rushing touchdown every 0.64 games and averaged 2.30 receptions per game. Through LeSean McCoy’s four-plus seasons, he’s averaged 4.75 yards per carry, scored a rushing touchdown every 0.52 games and averaged 3.70 receptions per game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted September 20, 2013 Share Posted September 20, 2013 The Chiefs defense is legit. Justin Houston is going to be in the running for DPotY at the end of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts