Jenksismyhero Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) NY Post might not be the beacon of respectable journalism, but they're not Steve from Soxtalk either (ba doom ching). If they've got a credible source there's got to be something there. But who knows, they could be full of it too. Edit: and the Post report says "authorities," which could be the FBI. Edited April 15, 2013 by Jenksismybitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:37 PM) Well yea, two of them shared the same date on purpose (Waco and OKC). I will say this, its sad that this happened but people just seem so desperate for something to be scared of or to be sad about. Two people are dead. That's about the same number of Americans that died in ways completely unrelated to this bombing in the time it took me to write this post. We cant get worked up over it. This isn't 9/11, this isn't Oklahoma City, this is not some overwhelming tragedy that should grip the nation the way it is right now. Our lives really are short and fragile, s*** like this kinda goes to prove it, so why do we ruin them being afraid of things that have an almost 0% chance of affecting us directly? I dont know. I dont get it. Hope the injured people wind up OK and they catch the guy who did it. Dude, stfu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:40 PM) NY Post might not be the beacon of respectable journalism, but they're not Steve from Soxtalk either (ba doom ching). If they've got a credible source there's got to be something there. But who knows, they could be full of it too. They've already been pretty substantially wrong twice now. I don't think they really are more credible than Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 09:41 PM) They've already been pretty substantially wrong twice now. I don't think they really are more credible than Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:30 PM) I respect the balls on those policemen to go straight at the bomb source without thinking twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:41 PM) They've already been pretty substantially wrong twice now. I don't think they really are more credible than Steve. What's the other one? The death count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:41 PM) They've already been pretty substantially wrong twice now. I don't think they really are more credible than Steve. Let's be honest. One of these involves an American tragedy. One involves Derrick Rose's playing the game of basketball. I would like this comparison stricken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:45 PM) What's the other one? The death count? yeah, plus their reputation overall as a s***ty tabloid rag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:44 PM) <!--quoteo(post=2784040:date=Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:30 PM:name=Jenksismyb****)-->QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:30 PM) <!--quotec--> I respect the balls on those policemen to go straight at the bomb source without thinking twice. Yeah, I'd imagine the first thing on my mind would be "secondary bombs" especially since there was a 10s delay between them. edit: and first reaction would probably be to gtfo Edited April 15, 2013 by StrangeSox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:46 PM) yeah, plus their reputation overall as a s***ty tabloid rag. Hey even the s***ty ones get it right on occasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:47 PM) edit: and first reaction would probably be to gtfo Yeah, that was my point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Dude, stfu. Why? Why cant I point out the real truth here? If two teenagers wrapped a V6 Mustang around a tree and got themselves killed it wouldn't get this attention, if two 10 year olds in the cancer ward passed on the same day it wouldn't even make the news. But a couple bombs go off with similar results and we cant help but be enamored by it. I generally wouldn't care about people's reaction to this, but I think it carries a price to immerse yourself so much in these stories. We get scared and we want something to be done to make us feel more secure. So because the first two Americans to be killed by a bomb in this country since I-dont-even-know-its-been-so-long an entire city is on lockdown and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. That's really all I wanted to say, I think someone should say it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Ha, apparently a Boston NPR reporter just reported that a suspect is under guard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Found our last runner, thank god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) Why? Why cant I point out the real truth here? If two teenagers wrapped a V6 Mustang around a tree and got themselves killed it wouldn't get this attention, if two 10 year olds in the cancer ward passed on the same day it wouldn't even make the news. But a couple bombs go off with similar results and we cant help but be enamored by it. I generally wouldn't care about people's reaction to this, but I think it carries a price to immerse yourself so much in these stories. We get scared and we want something to be done to make us feel more secure. So because the first two Americans to be killed by a bomb in this country since I-dont-even-know-its-been-so-long an entire city is on lockdown and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. That's really all I wanted to say, I think someone should say it. 1. Your analogies suck 2. You're just the worst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) Why? Why cant I point out the real truth here? If two teenagers wrapped a V6 Mustang around a tree and got themselves killed it wouldn't get this attention, if two 10 year olds in the cancer ward passed on the same day it wouldn't even make the news. But a couple bombs go off with similar results and we cant help but be enamored by it. I generally wouldn't care about people's reaction to this, but I think it carries a price to immerse yourself so much in these stories. We get scared and we want something to be done to make us feel more secure. So because the first two Americans to be killed by a bomb in this country since I-dont-even-know-its-been-so-long an entire city is on lockdown and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. That's really all I wanted to say, I think someone should say it. Neither one of those scenarios was designed by someone with the intent to hurt or kill innocent people. Theres your difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) Why? Why cant I point out the real truth here? If two teenagers wrapped a V6 Mustang around a tree and got themselves killed it wouldn't get this attention, if two 10 year olds in the cancer ward passed on the same day it wouldn't even make the news. But a couple bombs go off with similar results and we cant help but be enamored by it. I generally wouldn't care about people's reaction to this, but I think it carries a price to immerse yourself so much in these stories. We get scared and we want something to be done to make us feel more secure. So because the first two Americans to be killed by a bomb in this country since I-dont-even-know-its-been-so-long an entire city is on lockdown and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. That's really all I wanted to say, I think someone should say it. I understand what you're saying and made the same comment to my secretary - 4 people were shot and killed over the weekend in Chicago and no one thinks twice, yet we're glued to the TV/computer over this story. But still, you have to recognize that this is something entirely different. It's not a simple crime. It's a premeditated terrorist attack that happened in a big public space in broad daylight. It's movie-villian type s*** that you just don't see on a routine basis. It's someone killing random strangers for sport. In that respect it's different, it's noteworthy, and it's much more tragic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 also, 22 people are injured (maybe more), that's not nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) an entire city is on lockdown there were several unexploded bombs in the city and there could be more. and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. Yeah, not exactly unreasonable for people in Boston to be scared and shook-up right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:48 PM) Why? Why cant I point out the real truth here? If two teenagers wrapped a V6 Mustang around a tree and got themselves killed it wouldn't get this attention, if two 10 year olds in the cancer ward passed on the same day it wouldn't even make the news. But a couple bombs go off with similar results and we cant help but be enamored by it. I generally wouldn't care about people's reaction to this, but I think it carries a price to immerse yourself so much in these stories. We get scared and we want something to be done to make us feel more secure. So because the first two Americans to be killed by a bomb in this country since I-dont-even-know-its-been-so-long an entire city is on lockdown and people have found a whole new reason to be scared to live their lives. That's really all I wanted to say, I think someone should say it. There's no reason to say this. Those two events, though they may yield the same amount of deaths (we don't know yet) are completely unrelatable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 05:53 PM) also, 22 people are injured (maybe more), that's not nothing. Last report from CNN said 100+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:53 PM) also, 22 people are injured (maybe more), that's not nothing. Where are you getting your old-ass info? The Boston Globe ✔ @BostonGlobe MARATHON EXPLOSIONS: Two killed, at least 90 injured in Boston Marathon finish line explosions; third blast reported at JFK Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Neither one of those scenarios was designed by someone with the intent to hurt or kill innocent people. Theres your difference. You're assigning value to human life based on how its lost, which (at least to me) is a little f***ed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:53 PM) also, 22 people are injured (maybe more), that's not nothing. And these aren't just minor scrapes, reports were stating major amputations for many of the injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 15, 2013 -> 04:55 PM) Last report from CNN said 100+. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/0...hon-finish-line Update at 5:40 p.m. ET. At Least 60 Injured: According to an NPR count of patients at area hospitals, at least 60 people were injured. NPR reports: — "Brigham and Womens' Hospital has received 18 to 20 patients, with 2 in critical condition." — "Boston Medical Center has received 20 patients, including 2 children, all from the Marathon bombs. Most of these patients have lower-leg injuries, according to a hospital spokesperson. They don't have anything yet about condition of injured." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts