hi8is Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (bbilek1 @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 01:29 PM) I think we'd be expecting too much for Adams + Wong. Unless Alexei is involved as well which I highly doubt (too much cash for STL), we aren't getting both Adams and Wong. Give me Adams and Anthony Garcia for Peavy and I am very happy. I'm saying Adams isn't a possible get. If I'm wrong, will happily eat crow pie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harfman77 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 04:03 PM) That's dumb. Not saying you are necessarily wrong, but if you are turning down good, solid talent because you don't have a replacement ready on a team that isn't going to win a damn thing, then you are making a critical mistake I would imagine he isnt turning anything down, probably just slow playing. I imagine he just doesn't want to give another team leverage if it looks like we have a black hole at SS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
103 mph screwball Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (bbilek1 @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 04:22 PM) If money is an issue with STL, we should pay Peavy's contract and take in more talent. I know it would never happen but to me it is entirely practical. We have more money than we will spend why don't we use it to create young talent. Ultimately, I think Jaker goes to Boston but I think the FO should do everything in their power to have Matt Adams as our OD first baseman next year. Whatever the cost. I agree! With the money saved if they trade Jake, they can not manipulate the draft due to the new rules. They can not throw unlimited cash at international players. There is always the risk that the free agents on the market will not want to play for the Sox or be so over priced that the Sox don't feel comfortable signing the player. What they can do is continue to pay Jake and some cash strapped team going for it all could send a load of quality prospects. I think that is the best way to use money to rebuild the Sox quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 1m Sources: #Royals willing to listen on Ervin Santana, would move for right offer. https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (bbilek1 @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 09:22 PM) If money is an issue with STL, we should pay Peavy's contract and take in more talent. I know it would never happen but to me it is entirely practical. We have more money than we will spend why don't we use it to create young talent. Ultimately, I think Jaker goes to Boston but I think the FO should do everything in their power to have Matt Adams as our OD first baseman next year. Whatever the cost. And effectively pay a prospect or two 18 million dollars or so? Uh no that would be just horrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (Baron @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 03:33 PM) Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 1m Sources: #Royals willing to listen on Ervin Santana, would move for right offer. https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal That was expected. I'd still prefer Peavy. Damn Royals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (Baron @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 05:33 PM) Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 1m Sources: #Royals willing to listen on Ervin Santana, would move for right offer. https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal My concern would be if the Cubs put Smaradja on the market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Yeah poop. Hopefully their asking price is actually sky high and they arent just playing coy. Speaking of playing coy, Hahn might end up foxing himself out of a better deal, given the change of heart the Royals had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Funny the high amount of readers in this thread. Hi press? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 I don't think Ervin Santana should have anything to do with Peavy. He is a total wildcard. Jake is a CYA winner. Definite tier below Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 03:55 PM) Funny the high amount of readers in this thread. Hi press? They're all comedy scouts - here for my expert posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (103 mph screwball @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 04:45 PM) I agree! With the money saved if they trade Jake, they can not manipulate the draft due to the new rules. They can not throw unlimited cash at international players. There is always the risk that the free agents on the market will not want to play for the Sox or be so over priced that the Sox don't feel comfortable signing the player. What they can do is continue to pay Jake and some cash strapped team going for it all could send a load of quality prospects. I think that is the best way to use money to rebuild the Sox quickly. Ding, ding, ding. Don't necessarily pick it all up, but pick up a good chunk of these guys salaries and decimate a few farm systems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) Dan Hayes @DanHayesCSN 5m Any chance the #WhiteSox can include their lip synch Saliva video in one of these deadline deals? #GottaGo Expand Reply Retweet Favorite More @ImDaBaron 4m @DanHayesCSN We wouldnt get anything back for that Expand Dan Hayes @DanHayesCSN 4m @ImDaBaron bag of balls https://twitter.com/DanHayesCSN Yep thats about right lol Edited July 24, 2013 by Baron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 I mean they should still get a good package of prospects for the Jakester but Ervin being available means he is no longer the only game in town. They may end up not trading him now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 QUOTE (daggins @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 04:26 PM) I mean they should still get a good package of prospects for the Jakester but Ervin being available means he is no longer the only game in town. They may end up not trading him now. There were always going to be other starters available...but Jake is clearly better...this is a non-factor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 After Garza, no one even close to Peavy's caliber was available. Now there is someone else, and there are only a few serious suitors for Jake. The total return will go down and the Sox brass might not be willing to shelve 2014 yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEdWalsh Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 04:55 PM) Funny the high amount of readers in this thread. Hi press? Beats the hell out of the game thread. Edited July 24, 2013 by BigEdWalsh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 How Ervin Santana is even in the conversation as to "who is the better pitcher" is beyond me. More absurd than the Matt Garza conversation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 Well, 1. This season he has actually been BETTER than Peavy. 2. He is a rental, so this season is what really matters 3. He earns less money this season than Peavy. All of which combines into "Probably some GMs will think he is more valuable than Peavy" which directly translates to "There will be less offers for Peavy" which directly correlates with "There will be less return for Peavy". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 QUOTE (daggins @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 05:06 PM) Well, 1. This season he has actually been BETTER than Peavy. 2. He is a rental, so this season is what really matters 3. He earns less money this season than Peavy. All of which combines into "Probably some GMs will think he is more valuable than Peavy" which directly translates to "There will be less offers for Peavy" which directly correlates with "There will be less return for Peavy". Ervin Santana has always been extremely inconsistent. I would think the return for him might be similar to what we gave up for Liriano. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 I mean I am presenting real sky-is-falling scenarios here like some chicken little but that is just nuts. Santana could probably bring like, 2-3 legit prospects in trade. Slightly less than Garza, especially if the Royals kick a mil or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 QUOTE (daggins @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 05:15 PM) I mean I am presenting real sky-is-falling scenarios here like some chicken little but that is just nuts. Santana could probably bring like, 2-3 legit prospects in trade. Slightly less than Garza, especially if the Royals kick a mil or so. That's just not true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 My biggest fear is that we balk on sending money over and go for C level prospects and money savings. They key here is to maximize this for top tier talent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 05:53 PM) My concern would be if the Cubs put Smaradja on the market. That won't happen until next summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 QUOTE (southsideirish71 @ Jul 24, 2013 -> 07:28 PM) My biggest fear is that we balk on sending money over and go for C level prospects and money savings. They key here is to maximize this for top tier talent. We won't do that. We won't send so much money that is as if we are buying prospects for several million apiece, but I think we'll send a fair amount of money if it seems worth it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.