Jump to content

Rios, $1M traded to Rangers


PolishPrince34

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 03:16 PM)
Maybe I'm naive, but today makes me believe the Sox truly do feel they can contend next year.

They certainly could in theory...but they need some of the stuff that has gone wrong this year to go right next year again.

 

Starting, first and foremost, with the awful defense and fundamentals. Get that back to 2012 type performance and we can talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 12:15 PM)
Yes

Rios is not a bad player. If we're just eating money to not have him on our team, it makes no sense to do that.

 

I'm with DA on this one...there is no reason to pay Rios to play for another team. If we were bulging at the seams with mlb-ready talent, it would be one thing. But we aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jose Paniagua @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:09 PM)
Well not including money in the Peavy deal allows for offseason spending too. Cant completely simplify what happened yesterday into some immediate-consequence narrative

 

The FA class is really week, and the top guys are going to get PAID. I don't see the Sox going after any of those guys (maybe McCann since Flowers busted so bad) but I really believe the Sox are eyeing a rebuild.

 

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:10 PM)
I'd bet he's just going off the fact that we didn't eat any money in the Peavy deal.

 

I don't believe anything any chicago reporter says about our future direction.

Very well could be his thinking, which is why I said if true.

 

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:10 PM)
If you don't eat money, you get the pitching prospects like you got for Peavy. If you do eat $5 million or so you get the equivalent of Simon Castro. I don't blame them for not eating money.

If you eat enough, you should get someone better than Castro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 07:18 PM)
Rios is not a bad player. If we're just eating money to not have him on our team, it makes no sense to do that.

 

I'm with DA on this one...there is no reason to pay Rios to play for another team. If we were bulging at the seams with mlb-ready talent, it would be one thing. But we aren't.

 

Totally agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 08:18 PM)
Rios is not a bad player. If we're just eating money to not have him on our team, it makes no sense to do that.

 

I'm with DA on this one...there is no reason to pay Rios to play for another team. If we were bulging at the seams with mlb-ready talent, it would be one thing. But we aren't.

 

They pay him to play for another team so they can get good prospects so they can rebuild. Right now they're just dumping salary and will be fielding an even worse team next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bbilek1 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 03:18 PM)
This off season will be a very interesting one.

Actually, might not be all that interesting. The Sox are sitting there with a roster right now that they could field in 2014. They need a couple bullpen arms and a bench to do that, but if they wanted to, they could do very little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chunk23 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 03:19 PM)
They pay him to play for another team so they can get good prospects so they can rebuild. Right now they're just dumping salary and will be fielding an even worse team next year.

The assumption though is that some team is willing to offer "Good" prospects for Rios if the sox chip in money. There are signs that assumption is not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chunk23 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:19 PM)
They pay him to play for another team so they can get good prospects so they can rebuild. Right now they're just dumping salary and will be fielding an even worse team next year.

 

You're assuming we could get good prospects for Rios -- so far, the evidence suggests that we could not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:19 PM)
Actually, might not be all that interesting. The Sox are sitting there with a roster right now that they could field in 2014. They need a couple bullpen arms and a bench to do that, but if they wanted to, they could do very little.

It will be a long long boring winter I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 07:16 PM)
Maybe I'm naive, but today makes me believe the Sox truly do feel they can contend next year.

We will find out in 40 minutes but always felt that was the plan. It is nice that we are swimming in money and our rotation will cost less than 20 million next year. I'm guessing we add a bunch of midlevel free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:20 PM)
The assumption though is that some team is willing to offer "Good" prospects for Rios if the sox chip in money. There are signs that assumption is not true.

Yea there is, and it would be highly disappointing if that's not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:22 PM)
We will find out in 40 minutes but always felt that was the plan. It is nice that we are swimming in money and our rotation will cost less than 20 million next year. I'm guessing we add a bunch of midlevel free agents.

 

Sounds like 2005

 

Good, young rotation with an underperforming offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:24 PM)
My favorite part about Rios is that he really brings out the mouth-breather in fans. I can only imagine this must be what it's like to be a Bears fan.

 

If you don't get what you want. Hold on to him and trade him next deadline when he will have more value.

 

Yeah, that'll happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:24 PM)
My favorite part about Rios is that he really brings out the mouth-breather in fans. I can only imagine this must be what it's like to be a Bears fan.

 

If you don't get what you want. Hold on to him and trade him next deadline when he will have more value.

I guess you are putting down all those not so high on Alex Rios. If you want to see the true "mouth-breathers" go back to the first few pages of this thread and look at what people thought Rios could bring in a trade. Turns out, once again, Greg was correct.

 

I do agree he could have more value a year from now. He will be playing for a payday.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 12:27 PM)
I guess you are putting down all those not so high on Alex Rios. If you want to see the true "mouth-breathers" go back to the first few pages of this thread and look at what people thought Rios could bring in a trade. Turns out, once again, Greg was correct.

And a dead clock is correct twice a day.

 

Look, if you just rip on every single player we have, you're going to be more correct than not these days.

 

The problem is Greg's rationale for these opinions he has...which is nonsense almost in each and every case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...