Buehrle>Wood Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 7 142 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted December 4, 2013 Author Share Posted December 4, 2013 Honestly would not have minded that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Dec 4, 2013 -> 01:42 AM) Honestly would not have minded that. I'm happy the Cubs didn't get him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 This has been an amazing couple of days transaction-wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 Well, that's how the Yankees responded to missing the playoffs last time...sign a couple $100 million deals and win the series the next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShandyMan Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 that'll be a rough contract in 3-4 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 This has a high probability of being a big problem in the future. I see no way they sign Cano at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 The first name that came to mind with those numbers is Carl Crawford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Jake @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 09:00 PM) I see no way they sign Cano at this point. Swapping Cano for Ellsbury probably makes the Yankees worse, not better. What was the point of this signing if they can't keep their biggest bat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 08:04 PM) Swapping Cano for Ellsbury probably makes the Yankees worse, not better. What was the point of this signing if they can't keep their biggest bat? Also getting McCann and pursuing Stephen Drew and Omar Infante, things that probably aren't possible if they are spending on Cano. That is, unless they know something about the ARod case that we don't... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 09:04 PM) Swapping Cano for Ellsbury probably makes the Yankees worse, not better. What was the point of this signing if they can't keep their biggest bat? They claim the still have room for Cano. Makes me think that they are expecting to not have a certain 3b on their payroll next season due to suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 MLB @MLB 5m .@BryanHoch confirms: @JacobyEllsbury, @Yankees agree to 7-year, $153M deal; includes 8th-year option that could raise total value to $169M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 How many games does he average over the next 7 years? 120? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord chas Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 Johnny Damon 2.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Jake @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 09:07 PM) Also getting McCann and pursuing Stephen Drew and Omar Infante, things that probably aren't possible if they are spending on Cano. That is, unless they know something about the ARod case that we don't... Somehow if they lose Cano, those signings don't impress me at all. Between losing Cano and losing guys from their pitching staff, they'd be spending a whole lot of money to barely tread water in a tough division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 08:11 PM) How many games does he average over the next 7 years? 120? That's how much he averages now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 08:21 PM) That's how much he averages now Exactly. Dumb money. But they have it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 I had thought the theme of the Yankees off-season would be able to get under the luxury tax - was that just wrong, or does signing McCann / Elisbury / Cain somehow still work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (spiderman @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 10:59 PM) I had thought the theme of the Yankees off-season would be able to get under the luxury tax - was that just wrong, or does signing McCann / Elisbury / Cain somehow still work? Maybe more to come. A source tells Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports (on Twitter) that the Yankees not only believe they've got room for Ellsbury and Robinson Cano or Shin-Soo Choo, they still plan on signing at least one starting pitcher as well. Per Mlbrumors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (lord chas @ Dec 3, 2013 -> 08:15 PM) Johnny Damon 2.0 More like Carl Crawford 2.0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Dec 4, 2013 -> 01:12 AM) Maybe more to come. A source tells Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports (on Twitter) that the Yankees not only believe they've got room for Ellsbury and Robinson Cano or Shin-Soo Choo, they still plan on signing at least one starting pitcher as well. Per Mlbrumors The A-Rod suspension is one of the best things to ever happen to them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 Guess I'm one of the few who thinks Ellsbury will age really well. Glad the Sox didn't sign him, but that's a fine deal and I expect him to earn his money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 4, 2013 Share Posted December 4, 2013 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Dec 4, 2013 -> 12:34 AM) The A-Rod suspension is one of the best things to ever happen to them Yep. As soon as they can, they will move to void that contract, and the next legal battle begins. Arod's team has been laying a defense for that all along. This isn't about the suspension, it is about protecting the last four years of that contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSpalehoseCWS Posted December 5, 2013 Share Posted December 5, 2013 (edited) QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Dec 4, 2013 -> 08:48 AM) Guess I'm one of the few who thinks Ellsbury will age really well. Glad the Sox didn't sign him, but that's a fine deal and I expect him to earn his money. I agree with you, I think Ellsbury is going to be a very good player for years to come. He's going to kill with that porch in RF. Edited December 5, 2013 by CWSpalehoseCWS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.