Jump to content

2013 MLB Batting By Position


TheChrisSamsa

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (ChrisLikesBaseball @ Jan 1, 2014 -> 04:53 PM)
Yeah, looks like there's probably NL DH data included. "Average of averages" probably isn't the most effective way to provide this data.

The AL and NL splits don't show up all that different. The AL DH's have 20 points higher of OBP but similar slugging numbers, so the AL DH's have a .725 OPS, the NL is at .705.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 1, 2014 -> 04:04 PM)
The AL and NL splits don't show up all that different. The AL DH's have 20 points higher of OBP but similar slugging numbers, so the AL DH's have a .725 OPS, the NL is at .705.

 

 

That makes Dunn or Viciedo look a bit better...the days where you expected an 800+ OPS from 4-5 positions in the line-up are long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 1, 2014 -> 08:15 PM)
That makes Dunn or Viciedo look a bit better...the days where you expected an 800+ OPS from 4-5 positions in the line-up are long gone.

Don't worry though, that's why we're carrying an extra one (sigh...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jan 1, 2014 -> 07:15 PM)
That makes Dunn or Viciedo look a bit better...the days where you expected an 800+ OPS from 4-5 positions in the line-up are long gone.

 

And somehow the Sox are loaded with raw power.

 

Dayan, Davidson, Avi, JDA and Dunn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It shows you that a good DH will be worth paying for -- of course, that will tempt you to overpay for a bad one. In the non-steroid era, teams are really struggling to figure out what to do with that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...