Jump to content

LIVE Olympics THREAD. WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 348
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Feb 16, 2014 -> 05:26 PM)
It's the scoring system the NHL should have, but doesn't.

 

 

 

they did something on the XM NHL station a few weeks ago(first part of January?) where they awarded 3pts for regulation wins, 2 for OT/SO wins and 1 for OT/SO losses. The standings were basically the same in the East and Dallas at the time would've been ahead of Phoenix I believe. So things may have changed a little more since.

 

The Puck Daddy did this in the beginning of December and the only division race that was altered was the Metro, and that was when the Metro was an absolute trainwreck.

 

link

 

 

I'd just prefer seeing ties brought back in. 2 points for reg/OT win, 1 point for OT loss, 0 for reg loss. No shootouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I assume the U.S. didn't get the 1 seed because they went into OT for one of their games?

 

EDIT: For some reason I was under the impression that all wins counted the same, didn't realize they got 1 less pt for winning in the shoot out.

 

Yes, because Sweden had a cakewalk group, they were able to get three regulation wins, and got the #1 seed even their goal differential in three games was +5 while Canada has +9 and the US had +11, both in much tougher groups.

 

The IIHF needs to stop using world rankings to seed the Olympic tournament. The world rankings are based mostly on World Championships, which are played the same time as the Stanley Cup playoffs, so very few NHL players participate. Nobody thinks that Canada and the US are the 5th and 6th best teams at the Olympics, so it's stupid to seed the preliminary groups that way.

 

Now we get deprived of another epic US-Canada gold medal game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (zenryan @ Feb 16, 2014 -> 05:49 PM)
they did something on the XM NHL station a few weeks ago(first part of January?) where they awarded 3pts for regulation wins, 2 for OT/SO wins and 1 for OT/SO losses. The standings were basically the same in the East and Dallas at the time would've been ahead of Phoenix I believe. So things may have changed a little more since.

 

The Puck Daddy did this in the beginning of December and the only division race that was altered was the Metro, and that was when the Metro was an absolute trainwreck.

 

link

 

 

I'd just prefer seeing ties brought back in. 2 points for reg/OT win, 1 point for OT loss, 0 for reg loss. No shootouts.

I'm fine with ties.

 

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Feb 16, 2014 -> 06:06 PM)
Yes, because Sweden had a cakewalk group, they were able to get three regulation wins, and got the #1 seed even their goal differential in three games was +5 while Canada has +9 and the US had +11, both in much tougher groups.

 

The IIHF needs to stop using world rankings to seed the Olympic tournament. The world rankings are based mostly on World Championships, which are played the same time as the Stanley Cup playoffs, so very few NHL players participate. Nobody thinks that Canada and the US are the 5th and 6th best teams at the Olympics, so it's stupid to seed the preliminary groups that way.

 

Now we get deprived of another epic US-Canada gold medal game.

The divisions weren't terribly different. They all had 2 of the 6 powers in there, which is what you need. Slovakia and Slovenia played poorly - I thought Slovakia would be better. Norway and Austria are weak. Czech may not be Finland or Russia as a 2nd, but Switzerland is better than any 3rd team (going in) in any other division based on what we've seen so far. Even Latvia wasn't as awful as I thought they'd be.

 

It's also no guarantee US and Canada would both beat a Russia or a Sweden etc. to get there anyway. I wanted the matchup too, but if we get it in the semis, so be it, it'll still be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Feb 17, 2014 -> 06:43 AM)
Times (ET) set for the Elimination and Quarterfinal rounds:

 

Monday

SLO v AUT 3am

RUS v NOR 7:30am

SUI vs LAT Noon

CZE vs SVK Noon

 

Tuesday

SWE vs SLO/AUT 3am

FIN vs RUS/NOR 7:30am

CAN vs SUI/LAT Noon

USA vs CZE/SVK Noon

 

This is a Chicago sports message board. The Central time zone is the only acceptable time zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If baseball & softball were removed from the Olympics for issues with lack of competition, women's ice hockey can't be far behind. At last count, the US was outshooting Sweden 46-3 with a 5-0 lead. And that's in a semifinal.

 

Right, but a European country will at least win bronze. It's sports where Europe doesn't win any medals that end up getting booted from the Olympics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Feb 17, 2014 -> 08:00 AM)
If baseball & softball were removed from the Olympics for issues with lack of competition, women's ice hockey can't be far behind. At last count, the US was outshooting Sweden 46-3 with a 5-0 lead. And that's in a semifinal.

I think I saw this correctly. 19 women's finals in world cup or Olympics 18 were Us Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There aren't any women's games scheduled that day.

 

OK, there are women's games scheduled tomorrow, so tomorrow they have to play two games at the same time, and since the winners of those games are playing the next day, they can't schedule one of those any earlier in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Feb 17, 2014 -> 03:35 PM)
OK, there are women's games scheduled tomorrow, so tomorrow they have to play two games at the same time, and since the winners of those games are playing the next day, they can't schedule one of those any earlier in the day.

That still doesn't prevent them from staggering the game times on Wednesday, unless there is a rule where a game can't start, for example, 23 hours (or even 25) after the last game started instead of a full 24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That still doesn't prevent them from staggering the game times on Wednesday, unless there is a rule where a game can't start, for example, 23 hours (or even 25) after the last game started instead of a full 24.

 

Less than 24 hours would not be fair to the team playing two days in a row. More than 24 hours would have the game ending very late local time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...