Jump to content

White Sox @ Rangers 2:05 PM - CSN


Hawkfan

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 20, 2014 -> 08:19 PM)
I watched Mike MacDougal and Rob Dibble pitch in White Sox uniforms. That was the wildest wild pitch I have ever seen.

lol, i was trying to think if I'd seen a worse one.. MacDougal was bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 456
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Apr 20, 2014 -> 03:18 PM)
No I'm wondering if you think Bautista's low BABIP means he sucks. And also I thought the stat just annoyed you. Now it's stupid? I can get not wanting to pay attention to it, but surely you recognise its usefulness?

 

I wish De Aza was hitting .255 with 6 home runs and 21 walks. Bautista is right at his career average so that shows why BABIP is stupid.

Edited by BigHurt3515
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Apr 20, 2014 -> 03:22 PM)
Yeah ok dude

 

Jose's career average is .254. He is currently batting .254 with 6 home runs and 21 walks. I don't see how you are comparing him and De Aza?

 

Bautista is currently batting how he always does and De Aza is doing horrible, striking out all the time. IF both their BPwhatever are close to one another that should show you how stupid that stat is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ Apr 20, 2014 -> 02:25 PM)
Jose's career average is .254. He is currently batting .254 with 6 home runs and 21 walks. I don't see how you are comparing him and De Aza?

 

Bautista is currently batting how he always does and De Aza is doing horrible, striking out all the time. IF both their BPwhatever are close to one another that should show you how stupid that stat is.

Well, De Aza's BABIP is .154 and Bautista's .209. Bautista's is still way below average. I was merely wondering if a low BABIP meant a player sucked, because you said De Aza's .154 "showed he sucks". All it shows is that Bautista is getting less hits than he should expect the way he's been hitting, and De Aza's been getting a lot less. That's not to say they're aren't legitimate issues with De Aza, who is walking less and striking out more. Although I do think it's funny how you note De Aza is striking out "all the time", when he's striking out more than 10% less than Tyler Flowers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...