Jump to content

FIP/BABIP so far


QuickJones81

Recommended Posts

Looking at FIP and BABIP, I thought we could see who is pitching over his head right now and should be expected to come down to earth, and vice versa. Small samples sizes for all, but BABIP is usually a good indication of whether or not someone should be expected to regress or improve.

 

Curb Your Enthusiasm on:

Kevin Vance - FIP = 1.85, BABIP = 0.071

Jake Sanchez - FIP = 1.4, BABIIP = 0.105

Tyler Barnette - FIP = 2.54, BABIP = .207

Kyle Hansen - FIP = 2.61, BABIP = 0.231

 

Buy Low on:

Robinson Leyer - FIP = 3.37, BABIP = 0.448

Nestor Molina - FIP = 5.18, BABIP = 0.420

Brad Goldberg - FIP = 3.02, BABIP = 0.414

Scott Snodgress - FIP = 4.60, BABIP = 0.390

Braulio Ortiz - FIP = 3.84, BABIP = 0.349

 

Guys Getting it Done:

Jefferson Olacio - FIP = 2.51, BABIP = 0.366

Cody Winiarski - FIP = 1.97, BABIP = 0.415

Bryan Blough - FIP = 1.99, BABIP = 0.381

Tyler Danish - FIP = 2.31, BABIP = 0.326

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FIP is calculated from HR, BB and K (and HBP) and so is not really affected by fluctuations in BABIP. Using Snodgress for an example, his high BABIP is one reason why there is such a large difference between his ERA (10.50) and his FIP (4.47), but is not useful for predicting future FIP. Comparing ERA to BABIP would make more sense.

 

Thanks for compiling the list though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the scary side:

Andrew Mitchell: ERA = 6.00, FIP = 6.99, BABIP = 0.217

Myles Jaye: ERA = 5.50, FIP = 4.66, BABIP = 0.259

Chris Beck: ERA = 5.91, FIP = 4.57, BABIP = 0.217

 

I have high hopes for all 3 of these guys and they are off to pretty brutal starts.

Edited by QuickJones81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (QuickJones81 @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 01:43 PM)
On the scary side:

Andrew Mitchell: ERA = 6.00, FIP = 6.99, BABIP = 0.217

Myles Jaye: ERA = 5.50, FIP = 4.66, BABIP = 0.259

Chris Beck: ERA = 5.91, FIP = 4.57, BABIP = 0.217

 

I have high hopes for all 3 of these guys and they are off to pretty brutal starts.

 

You have to take all of these things with a grain of salt, especially at this point in the season. They may be on development plans where they are not throwing their best pitches in order to develop their other pitches, especially coming out of spring training. Statistics are not always an accurate measure, especially in the development process for pitchers. Excessive BB's, HP's, and WP's are red flags, but the rest can be pretty skewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (QuickJones81 @ Apr 22, 2014 -> 10:58 AM)
Looking at FIP and BABIP, I thought we could see who is pitching over his head right now and should be expected to come down to earth, and vice versa. Small samples sizes for all, but BABIP is usually a good indication of whether or not someone should be expected to regress or improve.

 

Curb Your Enthusiasm on:

Kevin Vance - FIP = 1.85, BABIP = 0.071

Jake Sanchez - FIP = 1.4, BABIIP = 0.105

Tyler Barnette - FIP = 2.54, BABIP = .207

Kyle Hansen - FIP = 2.61, BABIP = 0.231

 

Buy Low on:

Robinson Leyer - FIP = 3.37, BABIP = 0.448

Nestor Molina - FIP = 5.18, BABIP = 0.420

Brad Goldberg - FIP = 3.02, BABIP = 0.414

Scott Snodgress - FIP = 4.60, BABIP = 0.390

Braulio Ortiz - FIP = 3.84, BABIP = 0.349

 

Guys Getting it Done:

Jefferson Olacio - FIP = 2.51, BABIP = 0.366

Cody Winiarski - FIP = 1.97, BABIP = 0.415

Bryan Blough - FIP = 1.99, BABIP = 0.381

Tyler Danish - FIP = 2.31, BABIP = 0.326

 

Agree with all this, except the buying low on Molina. Pretty sure, that's what he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...