Jump to content

Sox pitching by the numbers...


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

Some interesting numbers for Sox pitching to this point in the season.

 

Overall ERA 28th- 4.91

Starters ERA 28th- 5.01

Relievers ERA 26th- 4.74

Walks 30th- 125 (next is TOR with 108)

K's 28th - 171

Hits allowed 28th - 249

Forced GIDP 2nd - 28

WP 29th - 19

GB outs 4th - 279

HR against 6th- 19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 01:05 PM)
Did anyone really foresee such a bad start for team pitching? I know some were concerned about the bullpen

 

Everyone should have foreseen this unless they just assumed Paulino, Johnson, and Danks were going to be solid options.. We all knew the bullpen was a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 11:47 AM)
Everyone should have foreseen this unless they just assumed Paulino, Johnson, and Danks were going to be solid options.. We all knew the bullpen was a concern.

Danks has been solid and should have rightly been expected to preform at this level. No one had reason to suspect Johnson to be this horrid. Paulino and the pen where always major points of contention and rightfully so.

 

Some of the issues should have been foreseen but no one could have speculated it to be this horrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (hi8is @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 02:12 PM)
Danks has been solid and should have rightly been expected to preform at this level. No one had reason to suspect Johnson to be this horrid. Paulino and the pen where always major points of contention and rightfully so.

 

Some of the issues should have been foreseen but no one could have speculated it to be this horrific.

 

Danks has not been solid, hes not striking people out and hes walking too many. Its going to catch up to him eventually. All we had was a small sample of Johnson at the major league level. I didn't think he would be outright terrible but I also didn't think he was a lock to be a good starter either. Paulino was a huge question mark, there was no reason what so ever to think a guy who hadn't pitched in the majors since 2012 was going to come in and be a solid contributor to the rotation.

 

I agree that thinking it was going to be horrific wasn't on anyone's mind, but its not shocking that the pitching has been struggling thus far. We had a patch work bullpen and only two starting pitchers who you would say are rock solid reliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 05:49 PM)
Danks has not been solid, hes not striking people out and hes walking too many. Its going to catch up to him eventually. All we had was a small sample of Johnson at the major league level. I didn't think he would be outright terrible but I also didn't think he was a lock to be a good starter either. Paulino was a huge question mark, there was no reason what so ever to think a guy who hadn't pitched in the majors since 2012 was going to come in and be a solid contributor to the rotation.

 

I agree that thinking it was going to be horrific wasn't on anyone's mind, but its not shocking that the pitching has been struggling thus far. We had a patch work bullpen and only two starting pitchers who you would say are rock solid reliable.

It also would not be shocking at all if this rotation (and bullpen) managed to improve during the season. In fact, with 2 guys coming off injury and a couple rookies as well just in the starters, that's kind of exactly what we should have hoped for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 04:50 PM)
It also would not be shocking at all if this rotation (and bullpen) managed to improve during the season. In fact, with 2 guys coming off injury and a couple rookies as well just in the starters, that's kind of exactly what we should have hoped for.

 

Of course it wouldn't, were 27 games into the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 04:54 PM)
Took less time than that for some people to declare that Paulino and Johnson were complete lost-causes.

 

Paulino is absolutely a lost cause. Hes never been good, one outlier year that he ended up with a mid 4 era, everything else is putrid and having any faith that he was going to come in here with a year layoff and be useful was foolish thinking.

 

No one should be jumping the gun on Johnson, but he was awful up here to start the year. No reason to think he cant get it together. Paulino on the other hand, he has no business seeing the active roster again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 06:14 PM)
Some interesting numbers for Sox pitching to this point in the season.

 

Overall ERA 28th- 4.91

Starters ERA 28th- 5.01

Relievers ERA 26th- 4.74

Walks 30th- 125 (next is TOR with 108)

K's 28th - 171

Hits allowed 28th - 249

Forced GIDP 2nd - 28

WP 29th - 19

GB outs 4th - 279

HR against 6th- 19

 

Some more stats

 

Overall:

FIP 28th- 4.33

xFIP 30th- 4.67

SIERA 30th- 4.66

 

Starters:

FIP 25th- 4.36

xFIP 29th- 4.53

SIERA 29th- 4.59

 

Relievers:

FIP 23rd- 4.37

xFIP 30th- 4.91

SIERA 30th- 4.75

 

xFIP and SIERA are two of the best stats for correlation to future ERA, with SIERA marginally better than xFIP.

 

Everything obviously bad, but at least the advanced metrics indicate that ERA should improve going forward for the starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 05:01 PM)
Paulino is absolutely a lost cause. Hes never been good, one outlier year that he ended up with a mid 4 era, everything else is putrid and having any faith that he was going to come in here with a year layoff and be useful was foolish thinking.

 

No one should be jumping the gun on Johnson, but he was awful up here to start the year. No reason to think he cant get it together. Paulino on the other hand, he has no business seeing the active roster again.

 

It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 05:20 PM)
It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft.

Still on this schtick no matter how many times you've been called out for it I see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 09:20 PM)
It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft.

 

My guess would be they go after a 3-4 type pitcher, as well as another lottery pick pitcher. With so few 1-2 pitchers on the market (Lester, Masterson, Scherzer, Shields), it's hard to picture the Sox outbidding all the major market teams that will be going after starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 05:28 PM)
What's the problem with signing a pitcher better than Q.?

Out of the available options who would be plausible? Is there another big time Japanese starter maybe available next fall? If not, particularly from the RH side, it's Scherzer at $200 million, Lester at maybe a similar amount although that makes no sense as he's a lefty, or perhaps Shields at a slightly lower amount.

 

But of course, if you actually look at his numbers, Quintana in his early to now mid 20's is only a tiny step behind what the veteran James Shields has done the last couple years, and so if you take into account you're getting his aged 33-37ish seasons, you're unlikely to get a better pitcher than Quintana over that deal.

 

So in order to sign someone better than Quintana this offseason, it's either a Japanese pitcher I don't know about who becomes available, or it's Scherzer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:57 PM)
Out of the available options who would be plausible? Is there another big time Japanese starter maybe available next fall? If not, particularly from the RH side, it's Scherzer at $200 million, Lester at maybe a similar amount although that makes no sense as he's a lefty, or perhaps Shields at a slightly lower amount.

 

But of course, if you actually look at his numbers, Quintana in his early to now mid 20's is only a tiny step behind what the veteran James Shields has done the last couple years, and so if you take into account you're getting his aged 33-37ish seasons, you're unlikely to get a better pitcher than Quintana over that deal.

 

So in order to sign someone better than Quintana this offseason, it's either a Japanese pitcher I don't know about who becomes available, or it's Scherzer.

 

Plan B it is then, sign a #3, trade for a top starting prospect to pair with the #3 pick.

Edited by Marty34
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...