southsider2k5 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Some interesting numbers for Sox pitching to this point in the season. Overall ERA 28th- 4.91 Starters ERA 28th- 5.01 Relievers ERA 26th- 4.74 Walks 30th- 125 (next is TOR with 108) K's 28th - 171 Hits allowed 28th - 249 Forced GIDP 2nd - 28 WP 29th - 19 GB outs 4th - 279 HR against 6th- 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Buzz, your girlfriend, woof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 14 quality starts. 9-5 record in those games. We need Sale back....soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Did anyone really foresee such a bad start for team pitching? I know some were concerned about the bullpen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 01:05 PM) Did anyone really foresee such a bad start for team pitching? I know some were concerned about the bullpen Everyone should have foreseen this unless they just assumed Paulino, Johnson, and Danks were going to be solid options.. We all knew the bullpen was a concern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 11:47 AM) Everyone should have foreseen this unless they just assumed Paulino, Johnson, and Danks were going to be solid options.. We all knew the bullpen was a concern. Danks has been solid and should have rightly been expected to preform at this level. No one had reason to suspect Johnson to be this horrid. Paulino and the pen where always major points of contention and rightfully so. Some of the issues should have been foreseen but no one could have speculated it to be this horrific. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 They say pitching and defense wins games, so when do the Sox start to plummet? It seemed the bullpen wasn't quite as bad against the Rays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 29, 2014 Author Share Posted April 29, 2014 Daryl Van Schouwen @CST_soxvan 4m White Sox bullpen has thrown 8.0 scoreless innings over last 3 games, has 2.31 ERA over the last 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Interesting, in the sense that a visit to the morgue can be interesting. But in all seriousness..i think some return to the mean is in order with this pen and it apparently has started up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (hi8is @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 02:12 PM) Danks has been solid and should have rightly been expected to preform at this level. No one had reason to suspect Johnson to be this horrid. Paulino and the pen where always major points of contention and rightfully so. Some of the issues should have been foreseen but no one could have speculated it to be this horrific. Danks has not been solid, hes not striking people out and hes walking too many. Its going to catch up to him eventually. All we had was a small sample of Johnson at the major league level. I didn't think he would be outright terrible but I also didn't think he was a lock to be a good starter either. Paulino was a huge question mark, there was no reason what so ever to think a guy who hadn't pitched in the majors since 2012 was going to come in and be a solid contributor to the rotation. I agree that thinking it was going to be horrific wasn't on anyone's mind, but its not shocking that the pitching has been struggling thus far. We had a patch work bullpen and only two starting pitchers who you would say are rock solid reliable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 05:49 PM) Danks has not been solid, hes not striking people out and hes walking too many. Its going to catch up to him eventually. All we had was a small sample of Johnson at the major league level. I didn't think he would be outright terrible but I also didn't think he was a lock to be a good starter either. Paulino was a huge question mark, there was no reason what so ever to think a guy who hadn't pitched in the majors since 2012 was going to come in and be a solid contributor to the rotation. I agree that thinking it was going to be horrific wasn't on anyone's mind, but its not shocking that the pitching has been struggling thus far. We had a patch work bullpen and only two starting pitchers who you would say are rock solid reliable. It also would not be shocking at all if this rotation (and bullpen) managed to improve during the season. In fact, with 2 guys coming off injury and a couple rookies as well just in the starters, that's kind of exactly what we should have hoped for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 04:50 PM) It also would not be shocking at all if this rotation (and bullpen) managed to improve during the season. In fact, with 2 guys coming off injury and a couple rookies as well just in the starters, that's kind of exactly what we should have hoped for. Of course it wouldn't, were 27 games into the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 05:52 PM) Of course it wouldn't, were 27 games into the season. Took less time than that for some people to declare that Paulino and Johnson were complete lost-causes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 04:54 PM) Took less time than that for some people to declare that Paulino and Johnson were complete lost-causes. Paulino is absolutely a lost cause. Hes never been good, one outlier year that he ended up with a mid 4 era, everything else is putrid and having any faith that he was going to come in here with a year layoff and be useful was foolish thinking. No one should be jumping the gun on Johnson, but he was awful up here to start the year. No reason to think he cant get it together. Paulino on the other hand, he has no business seeing the active roster again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzie Ball Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 06:14 PM) Some interesting numbers for Sox pitching to this point in the season. Overall ERA 28th- 4.91 Starters ERA 28th- 5.01 Relievers ERA 26th- 4.74 Walks 30th- 125 (next is TOR with 108) K's 28th - 171 Hits allowed 28th - 249 Forced GIDP 2nd - 28 WP 29th - 19 GB outs 4th - 279 HR against 6th- 19 Some more stats Overall: FIP 28th- 4.33 xFIP 30th- 4.67 SIERA 30th- 4.66 Starters: FIP 25th- 4.36 xFIP 29th- 4.53 SIERA 29th- 4.59 Relievers: FIP 23rd- 4.37 xFIP 30th- 4.91 SIERA 30th- 4.75 xFIP and SIERA are two of the best stats for correlation to future ERA, with SIERA marginally better than xFIP. Everything obviously bad, but at least the advanced metrics indicate that ERA should improve going forward for the starters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (TRU @ Apr 29, 2014 -> 05:01 PM) Paulino is absolutely a lost cause. Hes never been good, one outlier year that he ended up with a mid 4 era, everything else is putrid and having any faith that he was going to come in here with a year layoff and be useful was foolish thinking. No one should be jumping the gun on Johnson, but he was awful up here to start the year. No reason to think he cant get it together. Paulino on the other hand, he has no business seeing the active roster again. It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 05:20 PM) It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft. Still on this schtick no matter how many times you've been called out for it I see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:21 PM) Still on this schtick no matter how many times you've been called out for it I see. What's the problem with signing a pitcher better than Q.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 09:20 PM) It's going to be interesting to see how they assemble the rotation over the next couple of years. Outside of Johnson, there's nothing in the minors. Do they sign a top free agent, slot him at #2, Q at #3 or take a longer-term approach by signing a FA at #3, deal for a top pitching prospect and pair that guy with who they take in the draft. My guess would be they go after a 3-4 type pitcher, as well as another lottery pick pitcher. With so few 1-2 pitchers on the market (Lester, Masterson, Scherzer, Shields), it's hard to picture the Sox outbidding all the major market teams that will be going after starters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 30, 2014 Author Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:28 PM) What's the problem with signing a pitcher better than Q.? I can think of about 150 million reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 30, 2014 Author Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:21 PM) Still on this schtick no matter how many times you've been called out for it I see. Repeat it enough times, and it becomes true! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:33 PM) Repeat it enough times, and it becomes true! Stop it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:33 PM) I can think of about 150 million reasons. You thought the Tanaka bid was a sham, huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 QUOTE (Marty34 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 05:28 PM) What's the problem with signing a pitcher better than Q.? Out of the available options who would be plausible? Is there another big time Japanese starter maybe available next fall? If not, particularly from the RH side, it's Scherzer at $200 million, Lester at maybe a similar amount although that makes no sense as he's a lefty, or perhaps Shields at a slightly lower amount. But of course, if you actually look at his numbers, Quintana in his early to now mid 20's is only a tiny step behind what the veteran James Shields has done the last couple years, and so if you take into account you're getting his aged 33-37ish seasons, you're unlikely to get a better pitcher than Quintana over that deal. So in order to sign someone better than Quintana this offseason, it's either a Japanese pitcher I don't know about who becomes available, or it's Scherzer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty34 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 30, 2014 -> 04:57 PM) Out of the available options who would be plausible? Is there another big time Japanese starter maybe available next fall? If not, particularly from the RH side, it's Scherzer at $200 million, Lester at maybe a similar amount although that makes no sense as he's a lefty, or perhaps Shields at a slightly lower amount. But of course, if you actually look at his numbers, Quintana in his early to now mid 20's is only a tiny step behind what the veteran James Shields has done the last couple years, and so if you take into account you're getting his aged 33-37ish seasons, you're unlikely to get a better pitcher than Quintana over that deal. So in order to sign someone better than Quintana this offseason, it's either a Japanese pitcher I don't know about who becomes available, or it's Scherzer. Plan B it is then, sign a #3, trade for a top starting prospect to pair with the #3 pick. Edited April 30, 2014 by Marty34 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.