Ozzie Ball Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 Link Analyzing Rondon from a statistical and scouting perspective. Include some MLB comparisons. Also a .gif in there of an excellent barehanded play that Rondon made earlier this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 That was a great piece. Everything you wanted to know about Rondon. He's a special defensive talent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted May 5, 2014 Share Posted May 5, 2014 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 5, 2014 -> 08:43 PM) That was a great piece. Everything you wanted to know about Rondon. He's a special defensive talent. great job, in what I think is a short time. what I hope for is an underdog like story from this point on. I hope he make it to the majors, even if it for his glove. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winninguglyin83 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 the time to start looking for ARam's replacement is coming. let's see if the minor league folks can develop a hitter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Can anyone tell me how Omar Visquel profiled as a minor leaguer? It's been 20 some years ago, but I seem to remember that he was considered all glove, no bat as well. It would be tremendous if we had an Omar Visquel clone in our system! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (balfanman @ May 6, 2014 -> 07:34 AM) Can anyone tell me how Omar Visquel profiled as a minor leaguer? It's been 20 some years ago, but I seem to remember that he was considered all glove, no bat as well. It would be tremendous if we had an Omar Visquel clone in our system! Vizquel's career OPS numbers in A- and A were .623 and .649 respectively, with K/PA rates around 13%, and very little Iso power, walk rates around 12%. He also spent 3 seasons at those levels, at similarly young ages (18-20). So there is definitely some similarity there, though it looks like Vizquel was a little better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 Not that we want to compare Rondon to a hall of famer already, but he definitely needs to start walking more. I wish we could compare him to Ozzie Guillen, but Ozzie was an exceptional hitter in the minors and then he won ROY as a 21 year old (which is also the last time the Sox had someone win Rookie of the Year). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 6, 2014 -> 07:55 AM) Vizquel's career OPS numbers in A- and A were .623 and .649 respectively, with K/PA rates around 13%, and very little Iso power, walk rates around 12%. He also spent 3 seasons at those levels, at similarly young ages (18-20). So there is definitely some similarity there, though it looks like Vizquel was a little better. Thank you NSS & Wite. I still remember when the Indians got Visquel from Seattle and was wishing it was the Sox instead. I, for one, will be hoping that 20 some years later we got our own Visquel from Boston. Now, if we only had minor league instructors that could teach players how to hit like the Indians did back in the day. Edited May 6, 2014 by balfanman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 I want him to succeed if only so i can hear broadcasters say his name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ May 6, 2014 -> 08:30 AM) I want him to succeed if only so i can hear broadcasters say his name Hell, imagine if we draft Rodon. It's bad enough posters here call Rodon "Rondon" almost annually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (balfanman @ May 6, 2014 -> 08:29 AM) Thank you NSS & Wite. I still remember when the Indians got Visquel from Seattle and was wishing it was the Sox instead. I, for one, will be hoping that 20 some years later we got our own Visquel from Boston. Now, if we only had minor league instructors that could teach players how to hit like the Indians did back in the day. Jack Wilson, Pokey Reese, Brendan Ryan, Alcides Escobar - those are the names you want to think of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ May 6, 2014 -> 08:06 AM) Jack Wilson, Pokey Reese, Brendan Ryan, Alcides Escobar - those are the names you want to think of. And not Esteban Beltre. A defensive version of Pablo Ozuna would be nice. Basically, what Leury Garcia is/was supposed to be, but isn't quite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (balfanman @ May 6, 2014 -> 08:29 AM) Thank you NSS & Wite. I still remember when the Indians got Visquel from Seattle and was wishing it was the Sox instead. I, for one, will be hoping that 20 some years later we got our own Visquel from Boston. Now, if we only had minor league instructors that could teach players how to hit like the Indians did back in the day. If you were excited about Omar Vizquel after his time with Seattle, you should probably be a scout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 6, 2014 -> 09:20 AM) If you were excited about Omar Vizquel after his time with Seattle, you should probably be a scout. Lol!; No, I've just always valued defense and pitching over offense. I much prefer a pitchers dual over a 10 - 9 game. I loved last nights game for the most part, even though I only got to see the last half of it. My favorite part of baseball is observing how the pitcher and catcher are working together and how the defense is playing certain hitters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted May 6, 2014 Share Posted May 6, 2014 QUOTE (balfanman @ May 6, 2014 -> 10:10 AM) Lol!; No, I've just always valued defense and pitching over offense. I much prefer a pitchers dual over a 10 - 9 game. I loved last nights game for the most part, even though I only got to see the last half of it. My favorite part of baseball is observing how the pitcher and catcher are working together and how the defense is playing certain hitters. Wow. We may be the only two left that think this way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Lol!; No, I've just always valued defense and pitching over offense. I much prefer a pitchers dual over a 10 - 9 game. I loved last nights game for the most part, even though I only got to see the last half of it. My favorite part of baseball is observing how the pitcher and catcher are working together and how the defense is playing certain hitters. I won't lie. I find a 10-9 game far more entertaining, but I fell much better about my team if they are winning a game 1-0 than 10-9, if that makes any sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (balfanman @ May 6, 2014 -> 10:10 AM) Lol!; No, I've just always valued defense and pitching over offense. I much prefer a pitchers dual over a 10 - 9 game. I loved last nights game for the most part, even though I only got to see the last half of it. My favorite part of baseball is observing how the pitcher and catcher are working together and how the defense is playing certain hitters. I agree with that part. I just remember Omar being thought of as a back up IF, and that was it. Then he hit Cleveland, and wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 7, 2014 -> 09:08 AM) I agree with that part. I just remember Omar being thought of as a back up IF, and that was it. Then he hit Cleveland, and wow. you have to think anyone stuck in that lineup would develop his hitting merely by osmosis. Talk about a fearsome bunch of hitters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ May 7, 2014 -> 09:19 AM) you have to think anyone stuck in that lineup would develop his hitting merely by osmosis. Talk about a fearsome bunch of hitters Anyone know who the Indians minor league hitting instructors were 20 - 25 years ago and if they are still around could we kidnap them and get them in our system? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 7, 2014 -> 09:08 AM) I agree with that part. I just remember Omar being thought of as a back up IF, and that was it. Then he hit Cleveland, and wow. My personal opinion of the 2005 team, aside from great pitching and speed when Podsednik was healthy, was that overall we had a pretty good defense, especially up the middle. I really don't care too much about the offense as long as they can take a walk and maybe bunt once in a while; but I prize above all else a catcher, 2nd baseman, shortstop and centerfielder who can catch the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyAcosta41 Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (ptatc @ May 6, 2014 -> 06:45 PM) Wow. We may be the only two left that think this way. Really? With absolutely no intention of offending anyone, I've always believed that the VAST majority of hardcore fans, including all those who have played at the high school level and beyond, prefer everything that goes with the chess-match aspect of baseball over cro-magnon "piñata ball." And that's despite the media's interest in glorifying the shameful McGwire-Sosa-Bonds "chicks dig the long-ball era." The big bombs are an amazing part of the game. I enjoy the occasional slugfest too (as long as my guys win). But, baseball is so much bigger and richer than just that. You're not exactly the only two left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (ptatc @ May 6, 2014 -> 06:45 PM) Wow. We may be the only two left that think this way. I've never cared much for Home Run ball either. Overall I think that the Cell is a pretty good ball park, but I wish that it had Comerica Field dimensions. Would love a few doubles and triples, that to me is a much more exciting offense. You can then watch a pitcher pitch his way out of jams. My favorite player of all time was Carlton Fisk. I really loved how he worked with the pitcher. A.J. wasn't bad in that department either. I'm more concerned about Tyler Flowers development in this area than I am his offense! Edited May 7, 2014 by balfanman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balfanman Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (CyAcosta41 @ May 7, 2014 -> 10:10 AM) Really? With absolutely no intention of offending anyone, I've always believed that the VAST majority of hardcore fans, including all those who have played at the high school level and beyond, prefer everything that goes with the chess-match aspect of baseball over cro-magnon "piñata ball." And that's despite the media's interest in glorifying the shameful McGwire-Sosa-Bonds "chicks dig the long-ball era." The big bombs are an amazing part of the game. I enjoy the occasional slugfest too (as long as my guys win). But, baseball is so much bigger and richer than just that. You're not exactly the only two left. KEWL ! Agree 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (CyAcosta41 @ May 7, 2014 -> 10:10 AM) Really? With absolutely no intention of offending anyone, I've always believed that the VAST majority of hardcore fans, including all those who have played at the high school level and beyond, prefer everything that goes with the chess-match aspect of baseball over cro-magnon "piñata ball." And that's despite the media's interest in glorifying the shameful McGwire-Sosa-Bonds "chicks dig the long-ball era." The big bombs are an amazing part of the game. I enjoy the occasional slugfest too (as long as my guys win). But, baseball is so much bigger and richer than just that. You're not exactly the only two left. I hope you're right. It just seems that the vast majority of the people I talk to enjoy the 10-9 more than the 2-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 QUOTE (ptatc @ May 6, 2014 -> 04:45 PM) Wow. We may be the only two left that think this way. Sign me up as well. I love pitching, defense and situational hitting / baseball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.