Jump to content

2014 White Sox draft pick thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 693
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 09:36 PM)
The Astros took a guy that many felt was the best arm with the highest ceiling in the draft, found out that he may have some injury concerns after initially agreeing to a $6.5 million deal, and are still saying to him "look, we're still willing to give you $5 mill, which we believe is more than fair."

 

I don't see anything questionable with what the Astros have done.

 

Exactly, I'm not sure of their other issues, but any other sport and this would have been a known issue prior to the draft. Him continuing to get 5 million is a win for the players union I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't figure out if Aiken injury is a GOOD thing for us, or a BAD thing.

 

One the one hand, it may give us a bullet to use against Boras/Rodon as far as money goes if Aiken signs for only $5M.

 

But on the other hand, if the Astros don't sign him, it would not only bump our pick next year down 1 more spot, but if WE then fail to sign Rodon, we get the 5th pick as compensation instead of the 4th pick next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 04:36 PM)
The Astros took a guy that many felt was the best arm with the highest ceiling in the draft, found out that he may have some injury concerns after initially agreeing to a $6.5 million deal, and are still saying to him "look, we're still willing to give you $5 mill, which we believe is more than fair."

 

I don't see anything questionable with what the Astros have done.

 

Aiken is going to get paid if he holds out. Remember, if the Astros don't offer 90% of slot, they lose the compensation for Aiken not signing. His slot value is $7,922,100. Meaning if the Astros don't offer about $7.2 million, they won't get a replacement pick for Aiken if he doesn't sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 04:36 PM)
The Astros took a guy that many felt was the best arm with the highest ceiling in the draft, found out that he may have some injury concerns after initially agreeing to a $6.5 million deal, and are still saying to him "look, we're still willing to give you $5 mill, which we believe is more than fair."

 

I don't see anything questionable with what the Astros have done.

But if the Astros offer $5MM and he doesn't take it, then the Astros do not get a replacement first round pick in 2015, correct?

 

Edit: Sorry, I did not see Southsider's previous post.

Edited by oldsox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 07:32 PM)
Aiken is going to get paid if he holds out. Remember, if the Astros don't offer 90% of slot, they lose the compensation for Aiken not signing. His slot value is $7,922,100. Meaning if the Astros don't offer about $7.2 million, they won't get a replacement pick for Aiken if he doesn't sign.

They get a replacement pick if he failed the physical and they offered 40% slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 06:39 PM)
They get a replacement pick if he failed the physical and they offered 40% slot.

 

 

So around $3.2 million.

 

That makes sense. $5.5 million is pretty much the midpoint between $7.9 and $3.2...almost exactly.

 

Seems that's what Luhnow and company believe is a fair settlement.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 07:43 PM)
So around $3.2 million.

 

That makes sense. $5.5 million is pretty much the midpoint between $7.9 and $3.2...almost exactly.

 

Seems that's what Luhnow and company believe is a fair settlement.

The Astros have him by the balls. He is 17 or 18. $5 million sets him up pretty well if baseball doesn't work out. He is hurt. If he needs surgery, the draft next year is probably out. As long as the injury is legit, I think they are being more than fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 06:54 PM)
The Astros have him by the balls. He is 17 or 18. $5 million sets him up pretty well if baseball doesn't work out. He is hurt. If he needs surgery, the draft next year is probably out. As long as the injury is legit, I think they are being more than fair.

 

 

It would be interesting if we could get the test results to PTAC and see if he agrees conclusively that the Astros are warranted in red flagging him...

 

Can't Aiken's family get a second or third opinion now from Dr. Andrews or the Jobe Clinic and put that information out there publicly?

 

Who is the arbiter of whether there's a legit injury or not...to say they can lower the slot offer from 90% to 40%???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 07:54 PM)
The Astros have him by the balls. He is 17 or 18. $5 million sets him up pretty well if baseball doesn't work out. He is hurt. If he needs surgery, the draft next year is probably out. As long as the injury is legit, I think they are being more than fair.

 

You're right, Aiken has no leverage at all. He either signs for $5 mill, or he goes JuCo, in which case he's not getting drafted that highly again for at least 2 years, or he goes D1 and then he can't get drafted for 3 years. He HAS to sign. It's a goodwill offering by the Astros that they're giving that much.

 

QUOTE (Springfield SoxFan @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 10:04 PM)
Boras is not going to let his client be another Matt Harrington, but I realize there is precedent with Appel, but that only makes our case stronger with how terrible Appel has been this year. One week until Rodon signs, can't wait.

 

Appel did have a little less leverage than Rodon. So long as Boras has not had direct negotiations with the Sox, he can go back, but you can point to what Appel got as a senior draft pick #1 overall.

 

It's still 99.9999%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 10:41 PM)
You're right, Aiken has no leverage at all. He either signs for $5 mill, or he goes JuCo, in which case he's not getting drafted that highly again for at least 2 years, or he goes D1 and then he can't get drafted for 3 years. He HAS to sign. It's a goodwill offering by the Astros that they're giving that much.

 

 

 

Appel did have a little less leverage than Rodon. So long as Boras has not had direct negotiations with the Sox, he can go back, but you can point to what Appel got as a senior draft pick #1 overall.

 

It's still 99.9999%.

 

 

The most that the Pirates could offer Appel was like $3.2 million. He went back to school and got over $6 million I believe. Rodon will get $6 million now and most likely won't next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Evan Drellich of the Houston Chronicle explained in late June, Aiken would become a free agent if he failed his physical and the Astros did not make an offer of at least 40 percent of his slot value (roughly $3.17MM). Clearly, based on Heyman’s report, Houston is still comfortable enough with Aiken’s elbow that this scenario is unlikely.

 

However, the Astros would also lose the value of Aiken’s slot from their bonus pool should he elect not to sign, which would be problematic. The Astros were set to save about $1.4MM on Aiken’s original $6.5MM bonus, and a great deal of those savings were reserved for the $1.5MM bonus they’ve agreed to with fifth-rounder Jacob Nix – a bonus that is $1.13MM over slot. It is in Houston’s best interest to get some form of deal worked out, as losing Aiken’s slot would drop Houston’s overall pool to roughly $5.44MM, leaving them unable to officially sign Nix at that figure without incurring penalties in future drafts (the maximum penalty, which is enforced if a team exceeds its draft pool by more than 15 percent, is the forfeiture of a team’s next two first-round picks and a 100 percent luxury tax on the overage).

 

 

Also, reports from the Chronicle's Drellich that Flores (Aiken's personal trainer) says Brady is "absolutely healthy." Interesting to see how this one ends up.

 

Maybe Aiken's camp is going to ask for some kind of addendum where if he doesn't go down to TJ surgery within 6-10 years they will have to pay back the $1.5 million they're subtracting for the physical results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 7, 2014 -> 05:35 PM)
Interesting the new Astros regime involved in two "controversies" in the first round already....Appel selected after not signing with the Pirates, and now the Aiken situation.

How is drafting Appel after he didn't sign a controversy for the Astros?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 8, 2014 -> 12:40 AM)
As Evan Drellich of the Houston Chronicle explained in late June, Aiken would become a free agent if he failed his physical and the Astros did not make an offer of at least 40 percent of his slot value (roughly $3.17MM). Clearly, based on Heyman’s report, Houston is still comfortable enough with Aiken’s elbow that this scenario is unlikely.

 

However, the Astros would also lose the value of Aiken’s slot from their bonus pool should he elect not to sign, which would be problematic. The Astros were set to save about $1.4MM on Aiken’s original $6.5MM bonus, and a great deal of those savings were reserved for the $1.5MM bonus they’ve agreed to with fifth-rounder Jacob Nix – a bonus that is $1.13MM over slot. It is in Houston’s best interest to get some form of deal worked out, as losing Aiken’s slot would drop Houston’s overall pool to roughly $5.44MM, leaving them unable to officially sign Nix at that figure without incurring penalties in future drafts (the maximum penalty, which is enforced if a team exceeds its draft pool by more than 15 percent, is the forfeiture of a team’s next two first-round picks and a 100 percent luxury tax on the overage).

 

 

Also, reports from the Chronicle's Drellich that Flores (Aiken's personal trainer) says Brady is "absolutely healthy." Interesting to see how this one ends up.

 

Maybe Aiken's camp is going to ask for some kind of addendum where if he doesn't go down to TJ surgery within 6-10 years they will have to pay back the $1.5 million they're subtracting for the physical results.

6-10 years; seriously; Probably 30% of pitchers are going to have some form of surgery during a 6-10 year window. If not, higher. How about 1 year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 8, 2014 -> 09:49 AM)
6-10 years; seriously; Probably 30% of pitchers are going to have some form of surgery during a 6-10 year window. If not, higher. How about 1 year.

 

Yeah, I was going to say 1 year as well. 6-10 years and that TJS could have absolutely nothing to do with his elbow at the current stage. No one though Bronson Arroyo was unhealthy 6-10 years ago. He was the healthiest pitcher in baseball until last week. First ever DL trip, and it's TJS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (dayan024 @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 01:56 PM)
Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisMLB 3m

 

To clarify, yes. Rodon will sign w/@WhiteSox before the deadline. @PSLToFlushing: @MLBDraft safe to say by 7/18?

 

Jim Callis says it's 100%. Not even I'm that ballsy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...