Jump to content

White Sox vs Tigers


Kyyle23

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 512
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 08:32 PM)
Petricka is so underrated. Webb too. Putnam too. Basically our whole bullpen minus Belisario and Downs is good. I'm probably forgetting someone- oh yeah, except Guerra too. And Carroll.

 

Bellys been alright

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 08:32 PM)
Petricka is so underrated. Webb too. Putnam too. Basically our whole bullpen minus Belisario and Downs is good. I'm probably forgetting someone- oh yeah, except Guerra too. And Carroll.

 

 

Belisario is/was VERY good against the Dodgers and in the 8th inning set-up role.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (TaylorStSox @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 09:28 PM)
Absolutely, especially for outfielders. You just don't get a good enough perspective. You don't see plays develop. You don't see how players position themselves. You don't see their jumps. You see about 25% of the play on TV.

For evaluating a one-off play where no replay is shown, sure, it's not ideal. For evaluating over thousands of plays, it's easily enough, particularly when combined with studying defensive metrics. They're not ideal, but looking at them over a 3-year period is more than enough to accurately surmise whether a player is obviously good or obviously bad. Viciedo is obviously bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 09:34 PM)
Is Conor qualified yet for the AL batting leaders list yet?

 

Heard he would be #1 the other day but was just coming up short on plate appearances.

 

 

Kroled a grounder to Kinsler there.

I asked that too, no one had an exact answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Jun 10, 2014 -> 03:37 AM)
For evaluating a one-off play where no replay is shown, sure, it's not ideal. For evaluating over thousands of plays, it's easily enough, particularly when combined with studying defensive metrics. They're not ideal, but looking at them over a 3-year period is more than enough to accurately surmise whether a player is obviously good or obviously bad. Viciedo is obviously bad.

 

Reasonable post.

It's not ideal, but it is possible to rule a player a lousy defender by watching on TV and listening to the announcers on the replay, etc. Tank is no Chet Lemon, that is for sure.

Edited by greg775
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 09:32 PM)
Petricka is so underrated. Webb too. Putnam too. Basically our whole bullpen minus Belisario and Downs is good. I'm probably forgetting someone- oh yeah, except Guerra too. And Carroll.

There's a strong case to be made that Belisario's been better than Petricka this season, looking beyond ERA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Jun 9, 2014 -> 09:37 PM)
For evaluating a one-off play where no replay is shown, sure, it's not ideal. For evaluating over thousands of plays, it's easily enough, particularly when combined with studying defensive metrics. They're not ideal, but looking at them over a 3-year period is more than enough to accurately surmise whether a player is obviously good or obviously bad. Viciedo is obviously bad.

After you have the opportunity to see a couple live games, you'll get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...